Exploring the Strengths and Weaknesses of Ruangguru as Online Learning Platform to Support Students’ Learning Activity

Titin Arifa Maulida, Saiful Akmal


The existence of Ruangguru as one of the online learning platforms in Indonesia has helped students to learn at home individually. Ruangguru smartphone application allows virtual learning to become more organized in adjusting the curriculum. Ruangguru provides exclusive features to facilitate online learning, which makes this application widely used by students. However, many believe that Ruangguru still cannot replace face-to-face learning activities. Therefore, this research aimed to explore the strengths and weaknesses of this platform based on the students’ experience. The participants were five senior high school students batch 2021 from two courses in Banda Aceh who have experienced learning conventional/offline courses and online learning by Ruangguru. This research uses a qualitative approach with interview and observation as the data collection techniques. Based on the research findings, Ruangguru allows learning in an environment without time and place restriction. It is proven capable enough of changing the barriers caused by poverty, location, and other factors. However, Ruangguru could not replace conventional learning, especially in the context of social interaction. The main reason is that Ruangguru only focuses on the students’ learning achievements. However, some other significant aspects are overlooked such as low feedback, lack of peer interaction, and unscheduled learning.
Keywords: Ruangguru Application; Online Learning Platform; Conventional Learning

Full Text:



Alfarizi, M. K. (2020). Kelas Online Gratis Dibuka, Pengguna Ruangguru Kalahkan TikTok. Tempo (online). Retrieved from https://tekno.tempo.co/Read/1321028/Kelas-Online-Gratis-DibukaPengguna-Ruangguru-Kalahkan-Tiktok.

Alwasilah, A. C. (2000). Perspektif Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris di Indonesia. CV Andira.

Butz, N. T., Stupnisky, R. H., & Pekrun, R. (2015). Students’ Emotions for Achievement and Technology Use in Synchronous Hybrid Graduate Programmes. Research on Learning Technology, 23, 1–16.

Chaney, G. E. (2001). Web-based instruction in a Rural High School: A Collaborative Inquiry into Its Effectiveness and Desirability. NASSP Bulletin, 85(628), 20–35.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, fourth edition (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Fisher, J., & Whale, S. (2014). Flexibility and technology-enhanced learning and teaching: The rhetoric and reality. Proceedings of ASCILITE 2014 - Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education, 446–450.

Gherhes, V., Simon, S., & Para, I. (2021). Analysing Students’ Reasons for Keeping Their Webcams on or off during Online Classes. Sustainability, 13, 3203.

Gilbert, B. (2015). Online Learning Revealing the Benefits and Challenges How has open access to Fisher Digital Publications benefited you ? (Published Master's thesis) In Fisher Digital Publication (Vol. 4). St. John Fisher College.

Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed, pp. 333–350). Routledge.

Greenhow, C. (2020). Ask the Expert: Online learning vs. classroom learning. Msutoday (online). Retrieved from https://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2020/ask-the-expert-online-learning-vs-classroom-learning

Gunawardena, C. (1995). Social Presence Theory and Implications of Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferencing.”. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2–3), 147–66.

Kamsin, A. (2005). “Is E-Learning the Solution and Substitute for Conventional Learning?” International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 13(3), 79–89.

Kartosapoetro, I. S. (2019). RuangGuru dan Perubahan Pendidikan di Indonesia. Detik.com (online). Retrieved from https://news.detik.com/kolom/d4406697/ruangguru-dan-perubahan-pendidikan-di-indonesia

Knupfer, N. N., & McLellan, H. (1996). Descriptive Research Methodologies. Research Methodologies and Educational Communication and Technology, 7.

Mcmahon, M., & Pospisil, R. (2005). “Laptops for a Digital Lifestyle: Millennial Students and Wireless Mobile Technologies.” ASCILITE 2005 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 421–31.

Meyer, D. (2020). Virtual Learning Is the Way Forward for Educators. Elmhurst (online). Retrieved from https://www.elmhurst.edu/blog/virtual-learning/

Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Rosda.

Muhtar, S. N. (2014). Students’ Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety (FLCA) In EFL Classroom: It’s Levels, Sources and Coping Strategies. In Repository UPI.edu. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Palys, T. (2008). Purposive Sampling. The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Method, 2, 697.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon MCB University Press, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816

Rahmawati, A., & Sujono, F. K. (2021). Digital Communication through Online Learning in Indonesia: Challenges and Opportunities. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 6(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v6i1.815

Sadiku, M. N. O., Adebo, P. O., & Musa, S. M. (2018). On-line Teaching and Learning. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 8(2), 73–75.

Sembiring, L. T. A. B. (2018). Researching Students’ Interaction in Collaborative Learning Class. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 2(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v2i2.2197

Stern, B. S. (2004). A comparison of online and face-to-face instruction in an undergraduate foundations of American Education Course. Contemporary Issues on Technology Teaching and Education, 4, 196–213.

Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063

Tagoe, M. (2012). Students’ perceptions on incorporating e-learning into teaching and learning at the University of Ghana. International Journal of Education Development Using Information, Communication and Technology, 8(91–103).

Thomson, L. D. (2010). Beyond the Classroom Walls: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives o How Online Learning Can Meet the Needs of Gifted Students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(4), 662–712.

Yengin, I., Karahoca, D., Karahoca, A., & Yücel, A. (2010). Roles of teachers in e-learning: How to engage students & how to get free e-learning and the future. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5775–5787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.942

You, J. W., & Kang, M. (2014). The role of academic emotions in the relationship between perceived academic control and self-regulated learning in online learning. Computers & Education, 77, 125–133.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2017 Syiah Kuala University

ISSN: 2345-6789

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.