Blended Learning for Long-Lasting Education: Benefits and Constraints of Blended Learning Implementation on ELT

Salvida Yunita, Asnawi Muslem, Saiful Marhaban


This qualitative research aimed to discover the benefits and constraints of Blended Learning faced by English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers in teaching English. In total, 65 pieces of studies were analyzed by using tables and charts which are categorized based on the content of the research reports. Both quantitative and qualitative analysis were employed to analyze the data. Then, the data were computerized and processed using Microsoft Excel to see the distribution of each classification. There were fourteen tables of Paper Classification Form (PCF) classified in this study. The result shows that the Blended Learning (BL) model lists numerous advantages for both teachers and students. Moreover, the benefits of BL were categorized in terms of benefits for students, teachers, and pedagogy. However, there were few articles that described the constraints faced by the teachers and students during the implementation of BL such as the limitation of Internet access, the requirement of creative activities, and the problems with the students who have low motivation in learning.
Keywords: Blended Learning models, English language teaching, research reports

Full Text:



Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of online education in the United States. Babson Park MA: Babson survey and quahog research group, LLC. Retrieved July 10, 2019. Retrieved from

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th edition). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design (quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods approach). Thousand Oaks. CA: SAGE Publication.

Drisko, James W.,&Mashi, Tina. (2016). Content analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

Garner, B., &Oke, L. (2015). Blended learning: theoretical foundation. Indiana Wesleyan University. The brief report series from the center for learning and innovation. Retrieved from

Horn M. B. &Staker, H. (2014). Blended learning is about more than technology. Education Week. Retrieved from

Horn, MichealB.,&Staker, Heather. (2015). Blended using disruptive innovation to improve school. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Krippendorff, Klaus. (1989). Content analysis In E. Barnouw, G. Gabner, W. Schramm, T.L Worth., & L. Gross (Eds.), International encyclopedia of communication (Vol.1, pp. 403-407). New York: Oxford University Press.

Krippendorff, Klaus. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Lalima, &Dangwal, L. Kiran. (2017). Blended Learning: An Innovative Approach. Universal Journal of Education Research, 5(1), 129–136.

Luo, Amy. (2019). What is content analysis and how can you use it in your research? Retrieved from

Pathak, R.P. (2008). Methodology of educational research. New Delhi: Atlantic Press.

Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K.A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computer & education. 75, 185-195.

Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51–54. Retrieved from

Truit, Apricot A. (2016). A case study of station rotation blended learning model in a third grade classroom. (Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation). Retrieved July 11, 2020. Retrieved from

Truitt, A.A. (2016).A case study of the Station Rotation blended learning model in a third-grade classroom," ProQuest Diss. Theses.

Tsai, C.,& Wen, M. (2005). Research and trends in science education from 1998 to 2002 : a content analysis of publication in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (1), 3-14.

Tucker, C, R., Wycoff,T., & Green, J. T. (2017). Blended Learning in Action: A Practical Guide Toward Sustainable Change. Corwin: California, USA.

Tucker, Cailin. R.,Wycoff, Tiffany.,& Green, Jason. T. (2017). Blended learning in action: A practical guide toward sustainable change. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Sage Company.

Weber, Robert. Philip. (1990). Basic content analysis (Second Edition). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Zaharah, H., Saedah, S., Ghazali, D., & Nur Hasbuna, M. S. (2015). Kajian model blended learning dalam jurnal terpilih: satu analisa kandungan. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 3(1), 20–31. Retrieved from Vaughan, Norm. 2017. Perspectives on Blended Learning in Higher Education. International Journal on E-Learning, Volume 6, Number 1, January 2007 ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA. Jun L., Ling Z. (2011) Improving Flexibility of Teaching and Learning with Blended Learning: A Case Study Analysis. In: Kwan R., Fong J., Kwok L., Lam J. (eds) Hybrid Learning. ICHL 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6837. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Retrieved from

Namyssova, G., Tussupbekova, G., Helmer, J., Malone, K., Afzal, M., & Jonbekova. D. (2019). Challenges and benefits of blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 2(1), 22-31.

Shand, Kristen., and Glasset, Susan. 2018. The art of blending: Benefits and Challenges of a Blended course for perceive teachers. Journal of Education Online, 15(1) p.15.

Sudarman., & Sugeng. 2017. Analysis of need development of Blended Learning model based nine event instruction. International Conference on Education and Technology, vol 144. Atlantis Press. Retrieved from

Pardede, Parlidungan. 2012. Blended Learning for ELT. Journal of English Teaching, 2(3), 165-178.

Matukhin, Dmitry., & Zhitkova, Elena. 2015. Implementing blended learning technology in higher professional education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 183-188.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright © 2017 Syiah Kuala University

ISSN: 2345-6789

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.