Hide
Show all
Email this article 
Metacognition Knowledge of High School Students in Solving Limit of Functions Problems Viewed from Mathematical Ability
Abstract
The involvement of metacognition in the problem-solving process is paramount. This study aims to obtain a description of the metacognition knowledge of high school students in solving limit of functions problems. This type of research is qualitative descriptive research. The subjects of this study were two students who had high and low mathematical abilities. Data from the results of written assignments and in-depth interviews. The results showed that students with high mathematical abilities in solving limit of functions problems involved the metacognition knowledge they had at each stage of Polya, starting from their declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge. The subjects with low mathematics at the stage of understanding the problem involved only their declarative knowledge. The step of making a plan involves the declarative knowledge their memory and their procedural knowledge, although incomplete in compiling the ideas. The step of carrying out the plan involves all three knowledge of metacognition that he possesses, while the stage of re- examining involves only his declarative knowledge and his conditional. The results of this research can be a reference in designing limits learning in high school.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alam, A.(2020). Pedagogy of Calculus in India: An Emperical Investigation. Periódico Tchê Química, 17(34), 164-180.
Anif, S., Prayitno, H. J., & Sari, D. P. (2019). Metacognitive knowledge of mathematics education students in analytical geometry of space. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1211, No. 1, p. 012056). IOP Publishing.
Anggo, Mustamin, Mr. Suhar, dan Yoo Eka Yana Kansil. 2019. “Student’s Metacognitive Activities in Solving Mathematics Problems.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Advanced Multidisciplinary Research (ICAMR 2018) 227(Icamr 2018):16–20. doi: 10.2991/icamr-18.2019.5.
Antika, Linda Tri. 2018. “the Relationship Between Metacognition Skills With the Student’S Achievement: the Implementation of Reading-Concept Map-Think Pair Share (Remap Tps) Model.” Jurnal Pena Sains 5(1):19. doi: 10.21107/jps.v5i1.3629.
Astriani, Dyah, Herawati Susilo, Hadi Suwono, Betty Lukiati, dan Aris Rudi Purnomo. 2020. “Mind mapping in learning models: A tool to improve student metacognitive skills.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning 15(6):4–17. doi: 10.3991/IJET.V15I06.12657.
Bahri, Arsad, dan Aloysius Duran Corebima. 2015. “The Contribution Of Learning Motivation And Metacognitive Skill On Cognitive Learning Outcome Of Students Within Different Learning.” Journal Of Baltic Science Education 487–500. doi: http://eprints.unm.ac.id/id/eprint/11457.
Desoete, Anne. 2001. “Off-line metacognition in children with mathematics learning disabilities.” 160.
Egodawatte, G., & Stoilescu, D. (2015). Grade 11 Students' Interconnected Use of Conceptual Knowledge, Procedural Skills, and Strategic Competence in Algebra: A Mixed Method Study of Error Analysis. European journal of science and mathematics education, 3(3), 289-305.
Erdoğan, Fatma, dan Sare Şengül. 2017. “The effect of cooperative learning method enhanced with metacognitive strategies on students’ metacognitive skills in math course.” Education and Science 42(192):263–301. doi: 10.15390/EB.2017.6492.
Fitria, Nida, Mila Ermila Hendriyani, dan Ika Rifqiawati. 2019. “Analisis Pengetahuan Deklaratif Siswa Melalui Tes Berpikir.” Prosiding Seminar Naisonal Pendidikan FKIP 2(1):744–49. doi: https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/psnp/article/view/5781.
Flavell, J. .. 1979. “Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. American Pschologyst October 1979 Vol. 34, No. 10,906-911.” American Psychologist 34(10):906–11.
Gartmann, Shirley, dan Melissa Freiberg. 1995. “Metacognition and mathematical problem solving: Helping students to ask the right questions.” The Mathematics Educator 6(1):9–13. doi: http://math.coe.uga.edu/tme/issues/v06n1/3gartmann.pdf.
Gurbuz, M. Ç., Agsu, M., & Ozdemiri, M. E. (2018). An Analysis Of How Preservice Math Teachers Construct The Concept Of Limit In Their Minds. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(6), 104.
Indriana, Lidia, dan Iyam Maryati. 2021. “Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Segiempat dan Segitiga di Kampung Sukagalih.” Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 1(3):541–52. doi: 10.31980/plusminus.v1i3.1456.
Jaleel, Sajna, dan Premachandran P. 2016. “A Study on the Metacognitive Awareness of Secondary School Students.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 4(1):165–72. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2016.040121.
Kristanto, A., & Pradana, H. D. (2022). Developing Self-Regulated Learning Ability in Metacognition Field. Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran, 5(3).
Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson's Research Reports, 6(1), 40-41.
Voss, T., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates' general pedagogical/psychological knowledge: Test construction and validation. Journal of educational psychology, 103(4), 952.
Livingstone, J. A. 1997. “Metacognition An Overview.” State University of New York at Buffalo. doi: http:gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/CEP564/Metacog.htm.
Maswar. 2019. “Profil Antisipasi Siswa SMP/MTs dalam Memecahkan Masalah.” Indonesian Journal Of Mathematics and Natural Science Education 1(1):37–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.35719/mass.v1i1.5.
Maulana, Hanief; A. Rohim; A. T. Asmana. 2021. “Analisis Metakognisi Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Barisan dan Deret Bilangan Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematis.” Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika 7(2):71–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.52166/inspiramatika.v7i2.2726.
Miles, M.B. Huberman, A.M. Saldana, J. 2014. “Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook.” Hal. 485–87 in United states of America:sage. Vol. 28. Sage.
Pathuddin, Budayasa, I. K., & Lukito, A. (2018). Metacognitive knowledge of a student in planning the solution of limit problems. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1108, No. 1, p. 012032). IOP Publishing.
Pathuddin, dan S. Bennu. 2021. “Metacognitive skills of students with high mathematical abilities in solving contextual problems.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1832(1):0–7. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012048.
Permendikbud. 2016. Permendikbud No. 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Tujuan Pembelajaran Matematika.
Rao, N. J. 2020. “Outcome-based Education: An Outline.” Higher Education for the Future 7(1):5–21. doi: 10.1177/2347631119886418.
Ramadhanti, D., & Yanda, D. P. (2021). Students' Metacognitive Awareness and Its Impact on Writing Skill. International Journal of Language Education, 5(3), 193-206.
Rofii, Ahmad, Sunardi Sunardi, dan Muhtadi Irvan. 2018. “Characteristics of Students’ Metacognition Process At Informal Deduction Thinking Level in Geometry Problems.” International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education 2(1):89. doi: 10.12928/ijeme.v2i1.7684.
Saks, K., Ilves, H., & Noppel, A. (2021). The impact of procedural knowledge on the formation of declarative knowledge: How accomplishing activities designed for developing learning skills impacts teachers’ knowledge of learning skills. Education Sciences, 11(10), 598.
Salido, A., & Dasari, D. (2019). The analysis of students’ reflective thinking ability viewed by students’ mathematical ability at senior high school. In Journal of Physics: conference series (Vol. 1157, No. 2, p. 022121). IOP Publishing.
Setyaningrum, Defi U dan Mampouw, L. Helti. 2020. “Proses Metakognisi Siswa SMP dalam Pemecahan Masalah Perbandingan Senilai dan Berbalik Nilai Mosharafa : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.” Mosharafa : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 9(2):275–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i2.663.
Stephanou, Georgia, dan Maria-Helena Mpiontini. 2017. “Metacognitive Knowledge and Metacognitive Regulation in Self-Regulatory Learning Style, and in Its Effects on Performance Expectation and Subsequent Performance across Diverse School Subjects.” Psychology 08(12):1941–75. doi: 10.4236/psych.2017.812125.
Sudjana, Djamilah, dan Imas Eva Wijayanti. 2018. “Analisis Keterampilan Metakognitif pada Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan melalui Model Pembelajaran Pemecahan Masalah.” EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan) 3(2):206. doi: 10.30870/educhemia.v3i2.3729.
Supriati, D; M. Hasbi, Nurhayadi. 2021. “Profil Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Kelas VII dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Aritmatika Sosial pada Pembelajaran Daring Berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematika di SMP Negeri 4 Palu.” Media Eksakta 17(2):108–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.22487/me.v17i2.1305.
Telaumbanua, Y. .., Bornok Sinaga, Hotmika Sihombing, dan Edy Surya. 2017. “Development of Mathematics Module Based on Metacognitive Strategy inImproving Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability at High School.” Journal of Education and Practice 8(19):73–80.
Veenman, Marcel V. J., Bernadette H. A. M. Van Hout-Wolters, dan Peter Afflerbach. 2006. “Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations.” Metacognition and Learning 1(1):3–14. doi: 10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v10i2.31988
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Intan Marzuki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Didaktik Matematika
ISSN 2355–4185 (print) | 2548–8546 (online)
Published by:
Universitas Syiah Kuala incorporated with the Indonesian Mathematics Educators Society (I-MES)
Mathematics Education Department Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia - 23111
Website : http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/DM/
Email : jurnal.jdm@usk.ac.id
Jurnal Didaktik Matematika by Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.