The Use of Religious Language in Karen Armstrong’s Buddha
Abstract
Generally speaking, unlike ordinary language (OL), religious language (RL), which is normally used for communicating one's religious faith and experience, is deemed more appropriate for the dissemination of religious wisdom. The two languages, according to scholars, are distinguishable. For one thing, RL, which is primarily used to serve both a religious purpose and a religious context, is necessarily in possession of something that OL is not. This paper attempts to show that, due to its close association with the use of metaphors, RL can better convey the Buddhist teachings. To do that, it proposes to explore the notion of linguistic relativity in Buddhist theology using conceptual metaphor. It shall propose to display Armstrong's relative success in displaying some salient aspects of Gotama Buddha's wisdom teaching in her biography of the religious founder entitled Buddha (2004). The findings show that, with the use of RL (as opposed to OL), certain aspects of Buddhist transcendental teachings can be better illuminated. It is expected that these findings can help to enhance the important role of RL as a means for imparting religious content, particularly Gotama Buddha's (or GB's) wisdom which is the focus of the present study. It recommends reader understand someone's meaning through conceptual metaphor in communication. The authors suggest further research to investigate religious language by applying another approach.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Armstrong, K. (2004). Buddha. New York: Penguin Books.
Armstrong, K. (2007). The great transformation: The beginning of our religious traditions. New York: Anchor Books.
Harrison, V. S. (2007). Metaphor, religious language and religious experience. Retrieved September 2, 2016, from http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/ 3850/Deposited.
Hartmann, J.-U. (2004). Languages. In Robert E. Buswell, Jr. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Buddhism. New York: Thomson Gale.
Hawkes, T. (1972). Metaphor. London: Metheun.
Hayes, R. P. (2004). Buddhist philosophy of language. In Robert E. Buswell, Jr. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Buddhism. New York: Thomson Gale.
Ho, C.-H. (2008). The finger pointing toward the moon: A philosophical analysis of the Chinese Buddhist thought of reference. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 35(1), 159-177.
Jaspers, K. (1953). The origin and goal of history. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lang, K. C. (2013). Candrakirti on the limits of language and logic. In Steven M. Emmanuel. (Ed.). A companion to Buddhist philosophy. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Naeem, M. H. et al. (2014). Language of religion. International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 1, 41-43.
Ponterotta, D. (2014). Studies in conceptual metaphor theory. Roma: Aracne Editrice S.r.l.
Roberts, E. V. (1991). Writing themes about literature (7th ed.). London: Prentice Hall International Inc.
Sangharakshita. (1987). Survey of Buddhism: Its doctrines and methods through the ages. London: Tharpa Publications.
Sangharakshita. (1988). The religion of art. Glasgow: Windhorse Publications.
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive poetics: An introduction. London: Routledge.
Tan, P. (2006). Language and discourse: A brief survey of Buddhist philosophy of language, epistemology and logic. Sutta Discovery, 26, 160-196.
Thornbury, S. (2006). An A-Z of ELT: A dictionary of terms and concepts used in English language teaching. Oxford: Macmillan.
Ugwueye, E., & Ezenwa-Ohaeto, N. (2011). Religious language: Problems and meaning. Unizik Journal of Arts and Humanities 12(1), 173-187.
Yu, X. (2013). What are the metaphors we live by? Theory and practice in language studies, 3(8), 1467-1472.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.