Efforts to Exterminate Money Politics and Build an Integrity Based Democracy in Bireuen Regency

Muammar Qadafi, Risky Novialdi, M Romi Maulana

Abstract


In Bireuen Regency, as in many other regions of Indonesia, money politics has become a significant issue. This is evident in various corruption cases involving politicians and government officials. The repercussions include policies that often disregard public interest, instead prioritizing the agendas of specific political factions. This problem persists due to the cultural entrenchment of money politics, which has fostered public skepticism toward politics in Bireuen Regency. Consequently, systematic and comprehensive efforts are needed to combat money politics and establish an integrity-based democracy in Bireuen. The objective of this study is to outline measures that can be taken to counter money politics and build an integrity-driven political environment in Bireuen. Adopting a phenomenological approach, this research will be conducted in several phases, including preparation, implementation, and evaluation. The findings reveal that three key stakeholders play a crucial role in safeguarding democratic integrity and countering money politics in Bireuen: the government as the election organizer, regional leadership candidates, and the public. Should any of these parties engage in malpractice, it would adversely impact the image and quality of democracy in Bireuen Regency.


Keywords


Bireuen; Democracy; Integrity; Money Politic; Aceh Province

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, Z. (2021). Peran Ulama Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan di Propinsi Aceh. Journal of Governance and Social Policy, 2(2), 156-168.

Arsyad, N. (2022). Desa Anti Politik Uang (Studi Kasus: Desa Alenangka Kecamatan Sinjai Selatan Kabupaten Sinjai). Sawerigading: Journal Public Administration, 1(1), 11-16.

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.

Basri, H. (2020). Pola Praktik Penggunaan Politik Uang Dalam Pilkades (Studi fenomenologis transaksi politik dalam proses demokrasi local). Jurnal Setia Pancasila, 1(1), 58-69.

Berenschot, W. (2018). The political economy of clientelism: A comparative study of Indonesia’s patronage democracy. Comparative political studies, 51(12), 1563-1593.

Berenschot, W. (2019). Politik Transaksional: Klientelisme Dan Cakupan Untuk Kewarganegaraan Di Seluruh Indonesia. In Citizenship In Indonesia: Perjuangan Atas Hak, Identitas, dan Partisipasi (pp. 1-45). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Goldsmith, A. A. (2002). Clientelism, patrimonialism and democratic governance: An overview and framework for assessment and programming. US Agency for International Development Office of Democracy and Governance, 1, 49.

Fatayati, S. (2017). Relevansi Asas-Asas Pemilu Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Pemilu yang Demokratis dan Berintegritas. Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 28(1), 147-163.

Febrianto Budi Anggoro, 2024, https://aceh.antaranews.com/berita/371121/kejari-bireuen-masifkan-sosialisasi-cegah-politik-uang-jelang-pilkada, diakses pada 10 November 2024

Hefni, M. (2009). Patron-Client Relationship Pada Masyarakat Madura. Karsa Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 15-24.

Irawati, E. (2021). Peningkatan Kapasitas Desa Berdasarkan pada Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 2014 (Sebuah Kajian tentang Otonomi Desa). Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(2), 635-642.

Khan, M. H. (1998). Patron—Client Networks and the economic effects of corruption in Asia. The European Journal of Development Research, 10, 15-39.

Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). Citizen-politician linkages: an introduction. Patrons, clients, and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition, 2007, 1-49.

Kusmana, M. A. M., & Mustofa, M. U. (2024). Demokrasi Di Bawah Bayang-Bayang Patronase-Klientelisme: Memitigasi Praktik Politisasi Birokrasi Di Indonesia. The Indonesian Journal Of Politics And Policy (Ijpp), 6(1), 30-41.

Liwun, A. F. (2021). Analisis Hukum Penerapan Asas Kesamaan Dan Kepastian Pelanggaran Politik Uang Dalam Pemilihan Umum Dan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Menurut Undang-Undang Pemilihan Umum Dan Undang-Undang Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta).

https://harianrakyataceh.com/2024/11/04/ketua-panwaslih-bireuen-pelaku-money-politik-akan-disanksi/, diakses pada 10 November 2024

https://aceh.tribunnews.com/2024/10/29/hrd-berikan-tiket-umrah-atau-uang-rp-50-juta-bagi-yang-tangkap-pelaku-money-politik-di-bireuen, diakses pada 10 November 2024

Nastain, M., & Nugroho, C. (2022). Relasi Kuasa dan Suara: Politik Patron Klien Pada Pilkada Langsung di Kabupaten Grobogan 2020. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 13(1), 167-184.

Novialdi, R., & Rassanjani, S. (2022). Mengkaji Peluang dan Tantangan Praktik Paradiplomasi Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia di Kawasan Indo-Pasifik. Journal of Governance and Social Policy, 3(2), 108-124.

Nuna, M., & Moonti, R. M. (2019). Kebebasan Hak Sosial-Politik Dan Partisipasi Warga Negara Dalam Sistem Demokrasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 4(2), 110-127.

Pahlevi, M. E. T., & Amrurobbi, A. A. (2020). Pendidikan Politik dalam Pencegahan Politik Uang Melalui Gerakan Masyarakat Desa. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 6(1), 141-152.

Pamungkas, B. A. (2019). Pelaksanaan Otonomi Desa Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa. Jurnal USM Law Review, 2(2), 210-229.

Rizki, M., Wahyu, M. A., & Ghifari, M. S. (2024). Money Politics in Aceh: A Structuration Approach to Social Structure and Agency Interactions. Journal of Government and Political Sciences, 1(2), 87-104.

Robi, D. (2024). Kewenangan Bawaslu Dalam Pembuktian Money Politic Pada Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Malikussaleh).

Rodríguez, F. (2024). How clientelism works: Evidence from the Barinas special election. World Development, 184, 106734.

Rousseau, J. J. (2007). Du Contract Social (Perjanjian Sosial). Penerjemah: Vincent Bero, Jakarta: Visimedia.

Silalahi, W. (2022). Integritas dan profesionalitas penyelenggara pemilu demi terwujudnya pemilu yang demokratis. Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau, 4(1), 71-83.

Thalhah, H. M. (2009). Teori demokrasi dalam wacana ketatanegaraan perspektif pemikiran Hans Kelsen. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 16(3), 413-422.

Timotius, R. (2018). Revitalisasi Desa Dalam Konstelasi Desentralisasi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(2), 323-344.

Sulaksonon, T., Suswanta, S., Sutan, A. J., & Alqarni, W. (2024). WINNING WITHOUT VOTE-BUYING: A Q-DAS ANALYSIS TOWARDS THE 2022 NARUKAN PILKADES BASED ON POWERCUBE THEORY. Available at SSRN 4782383.

Setiawan, I., Ibrahim, I., & Ranto, R. Patronase dan Klientalisme Politik (Studi pada Masyarakat Daerah Pemilihan I, Kabupaten Bangka di Pemilihan Legislatif 2019). BULLET: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 1(06), 1255-1262.

Wahid, A. (2021). Kajian Islam Terhadap Problem Politik Uang dalam Pilkada di Indonesia. An-natiq Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, 1(1), 89-102.

Wardhana, A. F. G. (2020). Politik uang dalam pemilihan umum: Kajian perspektif demokrasi dan Islam. Journal of Islamic and Law Studies, 4(2).

Yusfriadi, Y. (2020). Komunikasi Politik Ulama Dayah Tradisional Aceh (Studi Ulama Kabupaten Bireuen dalam Menghadapi Pilkada 2019) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Yussman Idris, (2024) Simpang Mulia, Desa Anti-Politik Uang ke 17 di Bireuen, Akan Dibina, Diawasi Kejari Kelola Dana Desa, https://aceh.tribunnews.com/2024/10/31/simpang-mulia-desa-anti-politik-uang-ke-17-di-bireuen-akan-dibina-diawasi-kejari-kelola-dana-desa, diakses pada 09 Desember 2024




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/gaspol.v6i1.42954

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 62 times
PDF - 67 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

The Journal of Governance and Social Policy
Published by Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Based on work at https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/GASPOL