OPTIMISM IN LITERATURE LEARNING IN SCHOOLS IN THE INDUSTRY 4.0
Abstract
This paper sets a clear objective that highlights the conceptual definition of optimism in learning literature, particularly fiction, across school-wide practices in the era of Industry 4.0. Learning literature, in addition to providing personal pleasure, benefits oneself and others in a way that they can expand holistic critical thinking abilities and dispositions, foster a sense of integrity and compassion, experience aesthetic transactions, and broaden perspectives in social and cultural contexts. Teacher, student, instructional material, method, evaluation and media make up the key elements that define literature learning in secondary schools. There is a wealth of ICT (Information and Communication Technology) infrastructure available to schools that combines hardware and software systems designed effectively to deliver fiction learning in secondary schools. Readiness for fiction learning within online learning environment is deemed to be high with the available elements and infrastructure of the learning concept reaching 100% and 71, 42% expansion, respectively. The technological infrastructure roll-out of online-based platforms and services shapes the bedrock of Industry 4.0, which can enrich learning resources and ultimately set directions for the optimization of literature learning in secondary schools in a practical, creative, flexible, productive, accounftable and visible manner. Gearing toward Industry 4.0 calls for globally-ranging expansion of Wireless Fidelity (Wifi) and internet penetration among students.digital-based Indonesian-literature studies navigate students toward convenient, creative, effective and innovative learning platforms. Indonesian-literature education provides input to enhance students’ language proficiency and competence, both oral and written, and to foster literary appreciation skills. Preparedness of teacher, student, instructional material, media and infrastructure, both software and hardware, can shed light into what effective and successful literature learning will look like. A combination model of visual and auditory learning preferences enhances knowledge acquisition and learning force to a more considerable extent than one learning style or another.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ad-Duweisy, M. A.(2005). Menjadi Guru Yang Sukses Dan Berpengaruh. [Become a Successful and Influential Teacher]. Surabaya:
Aoun, J. E. (2017). Robot-proof: higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. US: MIT Press.
Appleman, D. (2015). Critical Encounters in Secondary English Teaching Literary Theory to Adolescents. New York: Colombia University.
Badudu J. S. (1985). Cakrawala Bahasa Indonesia. [Indonesian Language Horizon]. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Beach R., Deborah, A., Hynds S., & Wilhelm J. (2011). Teaching Literature to Adolescents. Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016.
Bhatt, B. D. (2002). Modern Methods Of Teaching. Concept and Techniques. Published by Madan Sachdeva for Kanishka Publishers, Distributors, 4697/5-21 A, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, New Delhi-110 002. New Delhi: Efficient Offset Printers.
Bohanh, F. K. (2018) Berapa Jumlah Pengguna Internet Indonesia. [How Many Indonesian Internet Users]. Retrieved from http://tekno-kompas.com/read/2018/02/22/16453177/berapa-jumlah-pengguna-internet-indonesia
Bristol, C. M. (2019). The Power of Optimism. Immortal Lessons. The Magic of Positivity. Published by Gildan Media LLC aka G&D Media.
Emerson, R. W. (2009). Experience in Essey. USA: Accessible Publishing Systems.
Faul, H. F. (2012). Theory of Literature. London: Yale University Press.
Hammond & Snowden. (2009). National Academy of Education. Guru Yang Baik di Setiap Kelas. [Good Teacher in Every Class]. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Hayani, N. (2019). Memperkuat Eksistensi Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Iindonesia di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0., [Strengthening the Existence of Indonesian Language and Literature Education in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0] Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 2 Januari 2019.
Hart, J. (2011). Literature, Theory, History. Palgrave Macmillan in the United States – a division of St. Martin’s Press LLC.
Jago, C., Shea, R. H., Scanlon, L., & Aufses, R. B. (2011). Literature & Composition. Reading, Writing, Thinking. Manufactured in the United States of America. For information, write: Bedford/ St. Martin’s, 75 Arlington Street, Boston.
Kardina, D., & Trisnawati I.(2019). Profesionalitas Guru Bahasa Indonesia (di Palembang) Dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. [Professionalism of Indonesian Teachers (in Palembang) in Facing the Age of Industrial Revolution 4.0.] Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 2 Januari 2019.
Kemenkominfo. (2019). Semua Sekolah Terkoneksi Internet. [All Schools Connected to the Internet]. Laman: (http://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/5627/2019-semua-sekolah-terkoneksi-internet/
Kusmayadi, I. (2010). Graphi Guide. Jadi Guru Pro Itu Mudah. [Becoming a Pro Teacher is Easy]. Jakarta: Tiga Kelana.
Meier, D. (2002). The Accelerated Learning Handbook Panduan Keatif dan Efektif Merancang Program Pendidikan dan Pelatihan. [The Accelerated Learning Handbook the creative Guide and Effectively Designing Education and Training Programs Bandung Kaifa]. Jakarta: PT Kharisma Putra Utama.
Moody, H. L. B. (1971). The Teaching of Literature, London, Longman Group Ltd.
Munir. (2010). Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. [Distance Learning Based on Information and Communication Technology]. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Muzakkir, K. (2014). Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah (K13). [Basic and Secondary Education Process Standards (K13)]. Retrieved from http://www.al.maududy.com/2014/05/standar-proses-pendidikan-dasar-dan.html
Paulson, T. L. (2010). The Optimism Advantage. 50 Simple Truths to Transform Your Attitudes And Actions into Results. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Rahmanto B. (1998). Upaya Meningkatkan Apresiasi Sastra Siswa Lewat Belajar Sastra di SMA. [Efforts to Increase Appreciation of Student Literature through Studying Literature in High School]. Penyunting Penyelia Hasan Alwi, Dendy S., dan SRH Sitanggang. Bahasa Indonesia Menjelang Tahun 2000. Risalah Kongres Bahasa Indonesia VI Jakarta: PPPB Depdikbud.
Sasonoharjo, & Piran W. (2002).Media Pembelajaran. [Instructional Media]. Jakarta: LAN RI
Sembiring, M. G. (2008). Mengungkap Rahasia dan Tips Manjur Menjadi Guru Sejati. [Uncovering Secrets and Tips for Becoming a True Teacher]. Yogyakarta: Galangoress.
Semi, A. M. (1988). Anatomi Sastra. [Anatomy of Literature]. Padang: Angkasa Raya.
Sharot T. (2011). The optimism bias : a tour of the irrationally positive brain. Published in the United States by Pantheon Books, a division of Random House, Inc., New York.
Suharianto, S. (1982). Dasar-Dasar Teori Sastra. [Basics of Literary Theory]. Surakarta: Widya Duta.
Tarigan, D. (1992). Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia I. [Indonesian Language Education I]. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Ubaedy A. N. (2009). Kedahsyatan Berpikir Positif. [The awesomeness of positive thinking]. Jakarta: PT Perspektif Momunika.
Uqshari Y. (2005). Percaya Diri Pasti. [Believe Itself]. Jakarta: Gema Insani.
Wandt, E., & Brown, G. W. (1957). Essentials of Educational Evaluation. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Wardani, I.G.A.K. (1981). Belajar Apresiasi Prosa. [Learning Prose Appreciation]. Jakarta: P3G, Depdikbud.
Wardoyo S. (2010). Dahsyatnya Pikiran Positif. [The awesomeness of positive thinking]. Yogyakarta: Manika Books.
Zaidin, A. M. (1980). Pembelajaran Apresiasi Puisi pada SMA Negeri Takalar. [Poetry Appreciation Learning at Takalar State High School] Skripsi, Makassar: FKSS IKIP.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/.v1i1.14444
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.