Page Header

  • Home
  • About
  • Login
  • Register
  • Categories
  • Search
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • SUBMISSION
  • TDMRC
Home > Vol 6, No 3 (2023) > Surtiari

 

About The Authors

Gusti Ayu Ketut Surtiari orcid
Research Center for Population, National Research and Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto Kav. 10, Jakarta 12710
Indonesia

Gusti Ayu Ketut Surtiari is a researcher at the research center for population of BRIN with the focus research on climate change adaptation, disaster risk reduction, community resilience, systemic and cascading risk.

Syarifah Aini Dalimunthe orcid
Research Center for Population, National Research and Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto Kav. 10, Jakarta 12710
Indonesia

Abdul Fikri Angga Reksa
Research Center for Regional Studies, National Research and Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto Kav. 10, Jakarta 12710
Indonesia

Dicky Pelupessy
Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI, Depok, Jawa Barat, 16424
Indonesia

Ari Purwanto Sarwo Prasojo orcid
Research Center for Population, National Research and Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia (BRIN), Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto Kav. 10, Jakarta 12710
Indonesia

Yasuhito Jibiki
Chuo University
Japan

Taro Arikawa
Chuo University
Japan

Publisher:

TDMRC Universitas Syiah Kuala

E-ISSN: 2527-4341

 P-ISSN: 2808-439X

Making Virtual Reality (VR)/Augmented Reality (AR) Possible to Strengthen Disaster Risk Reduction among Communities at Risk of Tsunami

Gusti Ayu Ketut Surtiari, Syarifah Aini Dalimunthe, Abdul Fikri Angga Reksa, Dicky Pelupessy, Ari Purwanto Sarwo Prasojo, Yasuhito Jibiki, Taro Arikawa

Abstract

This paper aims to seek a deeper understanding of the intention to use Virtual Reality (VR)/ Augmented Reality (AR) to strengthen disaster risk reduction using the technology acceptance model (TAM) among people at risk of a tsunami. Kuta, Bali, Indonesia, was selected as a case study due to its high tsunami risk and dense tourism activities. Data is collected by interviewing 148 households living along the coast who were selected purposively based on the hazard map of the tsunami and the location of tsunami drills in the past, including the proportion of migrants and non-migrants. Studies show that technology is needed to better prepare for future tsunami risks. Despite having experience in tsunami drills, understanding evacuation routes still needs to improve. People perceived VR/AR could provide integrated knowledge and information about tsunamis, including evacuation routes and shelters. Moreover, the VR/AR technology is also perceived to complement existing knowledge and information about coastal protection generated from ecosystem services. The result shows that the intention to use VR/AR is described by the perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Significant differences appear among different age groups and are not merely based on migrant's status. This study has an essential impact on policymakers, particularly in proposing the implementation of VR/AR to plan disaster risk reduction effectively.

 Keywords

VR/AR; tsunami; community resilience; disaster risk reduction; technology acceptance model

 Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Gahtani, S. S., & King, M. (1999). Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18(4), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492999119020

Alimamy, S., Deans, K., & Gnoth, J. (2018). An Empirical Investigation of Augmented Reality to Reduce Customer Perceived Risk. In P. Rossi & N. Krey (Eds.), Marketing Transformation: Marketing Practice in an Ever Changing World (pp. 127–135). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68750-6_42

Anderson, R., Booth, A., Eastwood, A., Rodgers, M., Shaw, L., Thompson Coon, J., Briscoe, S., Cantrell, A., Chambers, D., Goyder, E., Nunns, M., Preston, L., Raine, G., & Thomas, S. (2021). Synthesis for health services and policy: Case studies in the scoping of reviews. NIHR Journals Library. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573412/

Angus, L., Snyder, I., & Sutherland‐Smith, W. (2004). ICT and educational (dis)advantage: Families, computers and contemporary social and educational inequalities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569032000155908

Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.963459

Baaren, E., van de Wijngaert, L., & Huizer, E. (2011). Understanding Technology Adoption Through Individual and Context Characteristics: The Case of HDTV. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.546257

Basak, C., Boot, W. R., Voss, M. W., & Kramer, A. F. (2008). Can training in a real-time strategy video game attenuate cognitive decline in older adults? Psychology and Aging, 23(4), 765–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013494

Benssam, A., Nouali-Taboudjemat, N., & Nouali, O. (2016). An e-readiness assessment model for disaster management. International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 15(2), 118–143. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJITM.2016.076412

Bhattacherjee, A., & Premkumar, G. (2004). Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 229–254.

Brown, N., Margus, C., Hart, A., Sarin, R., Hertelendy, A., & Ciottone, G. (2023). Virtual Reality Training in Disaster Medicine: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Simulation in Healthcare, 18(4), 255. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000675

Carby, B. (2018). Integrating disaster risk reduction in national development planning: Experience and challenges of Jamaica. Environmental Hazards, 17(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2017.1415864

Charness, N., & Boot, W. R. (2009). Aging and Information Technology Use: Potential and Barriers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01647.x

Chau, P. Y. K. (1996). An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518128

Chen, P.-H., & Truc, N. T. L. (2008). Computer-Aided Visual Communication for Way-Finding in Emergency in Indoor Environment. ISARC Proceedings, 440–446.

Cipresso, P., Giglioli, I. A. C., Raya, M. A., & Riva, G. (2018). The Past, Present, and Future of Virtual and Augmented Reality Research: A Network and Cluster Analysis of the Literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02086

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Fong, H., & Harris, E. (2015). Technology, innovation and health equity. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 93(7), 438-438A. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.15.155952

Franchi, J. (1994). Virtual reality: An overview. TechTrends, 39(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02763870

García, S., Trejo, P., García, A., García, S., Trejo, P., & García, A. (2021). Intelligent VR-AR for Natural Disasters Management. In Augmented Reality and Its Application. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99337

Khanal, S., Medasetti, U. S., Mashal, M., Savage, B., & Khadka, R. (2022). Virtual and Augmented Reality in the Disaster Management Technology: A Literature Review of the Past 11 years. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frvir.2022.843195

Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental Detectives—The development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9037-6

Lai, Y.-A., Ou, Y.-Z., Su, J., Tsai, S.-H., Yu, C.-W., & Cheng, D. (2012). Virtual disaster management information repository and applications based on linked open data. 2012 Fifth IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOCA.2012.6449431

Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/506724.506730

Mehrabi, Z., McDowell, M. J., Ricciardi, V., Levers, C., Martinez, J. D., Mehrabi, N., Wittman, H., Ramankutty, N., & Jarvis, A. (2021). The global divide in data-driven farming. Nature Sustainability, 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00631-0

Mol, J. M., Botzen, W. J. W., & Blasch, J. E. (2022). After the virtual flood: Risk perceptions and flood preparedness after virtual reality risk communication. Judgment and Decision Making, 17(1), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500009074

Moudingo, J.-H., Ajonina, G., & Diyouke, E. M. (2015). Mangrove Social and Ecological resilience geared in the Cameroon Estuary. Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Mangrove-Social-and-Ecological-resilience-geared-in-Moudingo-Ajonina/90f3eb11fd9c966f7a4c583e1905b4b6a26e1fdc

Ordaz, N., Romero, D., Gorecky, D., & Siller, H. R. (2015). Serious Games and Virtual Simulator for Automotive Manufacturing Education & Training. Procedia Computer Science, 75, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.247

Post, J., Wegscheider, S., Mück, M., Zosseder, K., Kiefl, R., Steinmetz, T., & Strunz, G. (2009). Assessment of human immediate response capability related to tsunami threats in Indonesia at a sub-national scale. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9(4), 1075–1086. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1075-2009

R Core Team. (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Rialti, R., Filieri, R., Zollo, L., Bazi, S., & Ciappei, C. (2022). Assessing the relationship between gamified advertising and in-app purchases: A consumers’ benefits-based perspective. International Journal of Advertising, 41(5), 868–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2022.2025735

Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Criteria for Scale Selection and Evaluation. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (pp. 1–16). Academic Press.

Ruggiero, L. (2018). A Review of Augmented Reality Applications for Building Evacuation (arXiv:1804.04186). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.04186

Sagnier, C., Loup-Escande, E., Lourdeaux, D., Thouvenin, I., & Valléry, G. (2020). User Acceptance of Virtual Reality: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(11), 993–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1708612

Schwambach, G. C. S., López, Ó. H., Sott, M. K., Carvalho Tedesco, L. P., & Molz, R. F. (2022). Acceptance and perception of wearable technologies: A survey on Brazilian and European companies. Technology in Society, 68, 101840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101840

Sharma, S., Jerripothula, S., Mackey, S., & Soumare, O. (2014). Immersive virtual reality environment of a subway evacuation on a cloud for disaster preparedness and response training. 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Human-like Intelligence (CIHLI), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIHLI.2014.7013380

Spahn, H., Hoppe, M., Kodijat, A., Rafliana, I., Usdianto, B., & Vidiarina, H. D. (2014). Walking the Last Mile: Contributions to the Development of an End-to-End Tsunami Early Warning System in Indonesia. In F. Wenzel & J. Zschau (Eds.), Early Warning for Geological Disasters: Scientific Methods and Current Practice (pp. 179–206). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12233-0_10

Sunarta, I. N., Nugroho, S., & Adikampana, I. M. (2021). Spatial Transformation of Subak in Northern Kuta Tourism Area, Bali: From Agricultural to Cultural-Service. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.9734/sajsse/2021/v9i130229

Syed-Abdul, S., Malwade, S., Nursetyo, A. A., Sood, M., Bhatia, M., Barsasella, D., Liu, M. F., Chang, C.-C., Srinivasan, K., M., R., & Li, Y.-C. J. (2019). Virtual reality among the elderly: A usefulness and acceptance study from Taiwan. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1), 223. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1218-8

Tüzün, H., & Özdinç, F. (2016). The effects of 3D multi-user virtual environments on freshmen university students’ conceptual and spatial learning and presence in departmental orientation. Computers & Education, 94, 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.005

Velev, D., Zlateva, P., Steshina, L., & Petukhov, I. (2019). Challenges of Using Drones And Virtual/Augmented Reality for Disaster Risk Management. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-3-W8, 437–440. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W8-437-2019

Wegscheider, S., Post, J., Zosseder, K., Mück, M., Strunz, G., Riedlinger, T., Muhari, A., & Anwar, H. Z. (2011). Generating tsunami risk knowledge at community level as a base for planning and implementation of risk reduction strategies. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11(2), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-249-2011

Wu, P.-H., Hwang, G.-J., Yang, M.-L., & Chen, C.-H. (2018). Impacts of integrating the repertory grid into an augmented reality-based learning design on students’ learning achievements, cognitive load and degree of satisfaction. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1294608

Zeileis, A. (2004). Econometric Computing with HC and HAC Covariance Matrix Estimators. Journal of Statistical Software, 11(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v011.i10

Zhu, Y., & Li, N. (2021). Virtual and augmented reality technologies for emergency management in the built environments: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2020.11.004

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/ijdm.v6i2.34523

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Gusti Ayu Ketut Surtiari, Syarifah Aini Dalimunthe, Abdul Fikri Angga Reksa, Dicky Pelupessy, Ari Purwanto Sarwo Prasojo, Yasuhito Jibiki, Taro Arikawa Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal Content

Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
  • By Title
  • Other Journals
  • Categories
User

Indexed in:

      

Tools:

Visitors: 

 

Template:

Font Size

Keywords Bangladesh COVID-19 Indonesia climate change community community resilience coping strategies disaster disaster management disaster mitigation disaster preparedness disaster risk reduction institutional effectiveness knowledge local wisdom natural disaster preparedness resilience tsunami vaccination vulnerability
Article Tools
Abstract
Print this article
Indexing metadata
How to cite item
Finding References
Review policy
Email this article (Login required)
Email the author (Login required)
Open Journal Systems