The Role of Budgetary Control on Managerial Performance in Fertilizer Companies in Indonesia
Abstract
Abstract
Objective – This study aims to examine the influence of budgetary control on managerial performance of fertilizer companies in Indonesia with the characteristics of budgetary goal and knowledge of cost management as moderating variables.
Design/methodology – This study uses 144 samples of respondents from middle to upper level managers in the fertilizer industry, i.e. subsidiaries of Pupuk Indonesia. Data collection is carried out by utilizing survey questionnaires. Data analysis is performed using Moderating Regression Analysis (MRA).
Results – The findings indicate that budgetary control, characteristics of budgetary goal and knowledge of cost management influence managerial performance. Furthermore, characteristics of budgetary goal and knowledge of cost management was found to moderate the influence of budgetary control on managerial performance.
Research limitations/implications – This study is only limited to the companies that are engaged in the fertilizer industry, hence its results cannot be used for the purpose of generalization. Apart from that, the characteristics of budgetary goals and knowledge of cost management variables in this study are only quasi moderator variables.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agbejule., Adebayo., and Lotta Saarikoski. (2006). The Effect of Cost Management Knowledge on The Relationship between Budgetary Participation and Managerial Performance. The British Accounting Review 38 (2006) 427-440.
Balogun, A., Mamidu, A.I., Owuze, C.A. (2015). Budgetary Control and Organizational Performance. Journal of Education Research in Natural and Sosial Sciences (JERNASS) Vol, No.1, 2015
Blocher, Edward J., Stout., David E., Cokins, Gary. (2011). Manajemen Biaya Penekanan Strategis. Fifth Edition. Jakarta: Salemba Empat Publisher.
Gandasuli, James R. (2009). Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial: Pengetahuan Manajemen Biaya Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Kajian Akuntansi, Vol. 1, No. 2. (Agustus, 2009), pp. 84-99.
Ghozali, Imam. (2011). ”Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program SPSS 19”. Fifth Edition, Body of Publisher-Undip. Semarang.
Halioui K, and Leclere D. (2008). Budgetary Slack and Effectivenees of the Control: A configurational approach.Eur. Med. Econ. Financ. Rev., 3(2):96-120
Hansen, Mowen dan Guan. (2007). Cost Management : Accounting & Control, Sixth Edition.
Haryanti, H. (2016). Pengaruh Budgetary Goal Characteristics terhadap Kinerja Manajerial dengan Kecukupan Anggaran dan Komitmen Organisasi sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi Pada Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Journal of Nominal Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Volume V No.1 in 2016.
Hariyanti, I., & Othman, R. (2012). Budgetary Participation: How it Affect Performance and Commitment. Journal Accountancy Business and The Public Interest, 53-73.
Hastuti, I., & Susanto, H. (2015). The Participation Influence in Composing Budget Towards Managerial Performance Through an Organizational Commitment (A study in Sukoharjo Regional Government). Journal of Sainstech Politeknik Indonusa Surakarta, 1, 1-12.
Herciu, Mihaela. (2010). The Relation Between Managerial Performance And Firm Performance - Several Considerations", Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 49(1-2), pages 51-58, 04.
Isaac, L. Lawal, M. & Okoli, T. (2015). A Systematic Review of Budgeting and Budgetary Control in Government Owned Organizations. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting ISSN 2222-1697 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2847 (Online) Vol.6, No.6, 2015. www.iiste.org.
Kennis, I., (1979), Effects of Budgetary Goal Characteristics on Managerial Attitudes and Performance. The Accounting Review. LIV.2. pp. 707-72.
Liana, L. (2009). Penggunaan MRA dengan SPSS untuk menguji pengaruh moderating terhadap hubungan antara variabel independen dan variabel dependen. Journal of Teknologi Informasi DINAMIK. 14(2), 90-97.
Milani, K. (1975). The Relationship of Participation in Budget-Setting to Industrial Supervisor Performance and Attitudes: A Field Study. The Accounting Review, 50, 274-284.
Munawar, Irianto, Gugus, Nurkhoilis. (2006). Pengaruh Karakteristik Tujuan Anggaran Terhadap Perilaku, Sikap, dan Kinerja, Aparat Pemerintah provinsi di Kabupaten Kupang. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 9. Padang
Mutmainah, (2015). Pengaruh Karakteristik Tujuan Anggaran Dan Group Cohesiveness Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Jurnal Ilmu & Riset Akuntansi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia (STIESIA) Surabaya Vol. 4 No. 8 (2015).
Natsir, M. (2010). Pengaruh Partisipasi Dalam Penyusunan Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial dan Motivasi Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Semarang: University of Diponegoro.
Nengsy, H., Sari, R. N., & Agusti, R. (2013). Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Job Relevant Information, Kepuasan Kerja, dan Motivasi Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Journal of Accounting, 2, 1-17.
Nevita, Imaningati, & Farida (2014). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran terhadap Kinerja Manajerial dengan Pengetahuan Manajemen Biaya dan Budaya Organisasi sebegai Variabel Pemoderasi. Journal of Prestasi Vol.13 No. 1 June 2014. STIE BANK BPD Jateng.
Sangkala. (2007). Knowledge Management. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sarjono, Hariadi., & Julianita, W. (2011). SPSS vs Lisrel. Sebuah Pengantar, Aplikasi untuk Riset. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Saukani, Rasuli & Darlis (2015). Pengaruh Karakteristik Tujuan Anggaran terhadap Kinerja Manajerial dengan Motivasi sebagai Variabel Intervening pada Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Merangin. Journal of Sorot, Volume 10, Nomor 2, Oktober 2015 pp. 179 – 193.
Sekaran, U. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Untuk Bisnis. (Fourth Edition). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Savitri, Ritonga dan Ayuni (2015). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Dan Pengetahuan Manajemen Biaya Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Journal of Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis Vol. 12, No. 2, September 2015: 166-181 EISSN : 2442-9813 ISSN : 1829-9822.
Shields, M., Young, M. (1994). Managing Innovation Costs: A Study of Cost Conscious Behavior by R&D Professionals. Journal of Management Accounting Research 6, 175-196.
Siyanbola, Tunji,T. (2013). The Impact of Budget and Budegtary Control On The Performance Of Manufacturing Company In Negeria. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research (JBM&SSR) Vol.2 No. 12, December 2013. ISSN No:2319-5614.Supriyono, R. A. (2001). Akuntansi Manajemen I Edisi 1. BPFE. Yogyakarta.
Solimun, (2010).Analisis Variabel Moderasi dan Mediasi. Online Article. Accessed on May 18, 2018. https://www.academia.edu/8314503/Solimun_Program_Studi_Statistika_FMI PA.
Sondang P. Siagian (2000). Fungsi-fungsi Manajerial, Bumi Aksara. Jakarta
Stede,V, Wim A. (2001). Measuring ‘tight budgetary control’. Management Accounting Research, 2001, 12, 119–137.
Susanto, Firman David. (2006). Pengaruh Pengendalian Anggaran Terhadap Prestasi Kerja. Skripsi. Faculty of Economics Jember.
Suwatno dan Donni Juni Priansa. (2011). Manajemen SDM dalam Organisasi Publik dan Bisnis. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Yoga, Agus.S. (2015). Pengaruh Pengendalian Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Motivasi Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Jurusan Akuntansi Universitas Jember (Artikel Ilmiah Mahasiswa Tahun 2015).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jaroe.v1i2.11876
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Published by:
Accounting Department
Economics and Business Faculty
Syiah Kuala University
Kopelma Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia - 23111
E-ISSN: 2621-1041
Journal of Accounting Research, Organization and Economics by Accounting Department of Economics and Business Faculty of Syiah Kuala University is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JAROE/index.