Are Auditors Biased? The Effect of Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristics on Auditors’ Judgment

Ashari Krida, Wiyono Pontjoharyo

Abstract


Objective –The objective of this paper is to illustrate one of the crucial factors that affect auditors in making their judgment which can lead to systematic error. This paper provides background on how heuristics and biases can affect the judgment of auditors to increase the awareness of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic on audit judgment.

Methodology –This research is a 2 x 2 experimental study which analyzes the employment of anchoring and adjusting bias of auditor in the process of making their audit judgment. This research employed three (3) experimental questions on 100 auditors in Surabaya, Indonesia, with experiences ranging from 0-8 years.

Results –The result indicates that is evident that anchoring and adjustment heuristic exist and affect auditors’ judgment. The findings also indicates that experience influence auditors’ judgment whereas gender does not have such effect on auditors’ judgment. However, experience and gender can moderate the effect of anchoring and adjustment heuristic on auditors’ judgment.

Research limitations/implications –The experimental questions used were simplified abstractions compared to the complex analytical reviews auditors typically encounter. Additionally, the sample size, consisting of 100 auditors, may limit the generalizability of the findings. The study exclusively focused on differences in auditor judgment influenced by anchoring and adjusting, without exploring potential contributions from other heuristic factors. Lastly, gender was categorized broadly as male and female, without further differentiation based on specific gender characteristics.

Novelty/Originality –Its originality lies in adding moderation variable of gender and experience. While prior research has explored the impact of behavior on audit judgment to enhance decision-making in auditing, none have investigated anchoring and adjustment heuristics while considering the moderating factors of gender and experience.

Keywords


audit judgment; heuristics and biases; anchoring and adjustment; experience; gender

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdelfattah, T., Elmahgoub, M., & Elamer, A. A. (2021). Female Audit Partners and Extended Audit Reporting: UK Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 174(1), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04607-0

Aida, N. (2021). Work Experience, Obedience Pressure and Task Complexity on Audit Judgment. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 1(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v1i2.51

Ashton, R. H. (1984). Integrating Research and Teaching in Auditing: Fifteen Cases on Judgment and Decision Making. The Accounting Review, 59(1), 78–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/247118

Atmaja, D. (2018). PENGARUH KOMPETENSI, PROFESIONALISME, DAN PENGALAMAN AUDIT TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN AUDITOR BADAN PEMERIKSA KEUANGAN (BPK) DALAM MENDETEKSI FRAUD DENGAN TEKNIK AUDIT BERBANTUAN KOMPUTER (TABK) SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI. Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing & Informasi, 16(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.25105/mraai.v16i1.2078

Atmaja, I. W., & Sukartha, M. (2021). THE INFLUENCE OF SELF EFFICACY, PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM, AND GENDER OF AUDITORS ON AUDIT JUDGMENT. In American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (Issue 5). www.ajhssr.com

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2021). Jumlah Perusahan Industri Besar dan Sedang Yang Aktif Menurut Kecamatan Di Kota Surabaya Tahun 2019.

Biggs, S. F., & Wild, J. J. (1985). An Investigation of Auditor Judgment in Analytical Review. The Accounting Review, 60(4), 607–633. http://www.jstor.org/stable/247458

Bonner, S. E., Libby, R., & Nelson, M. W. (1997). Audit category knowledge as a precondition to learning from experience. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(5), 387–410. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00049-9

Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(2), 115–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2841

Chung, J., & Monroe, G. (1998). Gender differences in information processing: An empirical test of the hypothesis‐confirming strategy in an audit context. Accounting & Finance, 38, 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-629X.00013

Detzen, D., & Gold, A. (2021). The different shades of audit quality: A review of the academic literature. Maandblad Voor Accountancy En Bedrijfseconomie, 95(1/2), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.95.60608

Diah Puspa Arum, E. (2008). PENGARUH PERSUASI ATAS PREFERENSI KLIEN DAN PENGALAMAN AUDIT TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN AUDITOR DALAM MENGEVALUASI BUKTI AUDIT. In Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia (Vol. 5, Issue 2).

Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006). The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic: Why the Adjustments Are Insufficient. Psychological Science, 17, 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01704.x

Ghani, E. K., Hassan, R., & Ilias, A. (2021). Do Organisational Ethical Culture, Audit Experience and Ethics Awareness Influence Internal Auditors’ Ethical Judgment? International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarafms/v11-i3/10972

Gramling, A. A., Rittenberg, L. E., & Johnstone, K. M. (2012). Auditing. South-Western/Cengage Learning. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=sMu7rds4ERIC

Hasan, B. T., Chand, P., & Lu, M. (2021). Influence of auditor’s gender, experience, rule observance attitudes and critical thinking disposition on materiality judgements. International Journal of Auditing, 25(1), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12216

Henrizi, P., Himmelsbach, D., & Hunziker, S. (2020). Anchoring and adjustment effects on audit judgments: experimental evidence from Switzerland. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(4), 598–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2020-0011

Jamilah, S., Fanani, Z., & Chandrarin, G. (2007). Pengaruh gender, tekanan ketaatan, dan kompleksitas tugas terhadap audit judgment. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X,.

Joyce, E. J., & Biddle, G. C. (1981). Anchoring and Adjustment in Probabilistic Inference in Auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 19(1), 120–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490965

Kadir, N., & Hasibuan, D. (2018). PENGARUH PENGALAMAN DAN TEKANAN KETAATANTERHADAP AUDIT JUDGEMENT. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 5(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v5i1.18

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow.

Kinney, W. R., & Uecker, W. C. (1982). Mitigating the Consequences of Anchoring in Auditor Judgments. The Accounting Review, 57(1), 55–69. http://www.jstor.org/stable/246739

Knechel, W. R. (2013). Do Auditing Standards Matter? Current Issues in Auditing, 7(2), A1–A16. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-50499

Kowalczyk, T. K., & Wolfe, C. J. (1998). Anchoring effects associated with recommendations from expert decision aids: an experimental analysis. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 10.

Little, A. S., & Wu, S. J. (2022). Cognitive bias and neurosurgical decision making. In J Neurosurg (Vol. 137).

Manurung, L. A. R., & Hasbi, M. (2023). The Effect of Gender Differences, Locus of Control, and Seniority Auditor on Audit Judgment: Empirical Studies in East Jakarta Public Accounting Firms. Research of Accounting and Governance, 1(2), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.58777/rag.v1i2.48

Maradona, A. F. (2020). A Qualitative Exploration of Heuristics and Cognitive Biases in Auditor Judgements. ACCOUNTABILITY, 9(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.32400/ja.30634.9.2.2020.94-112

Merdekawati, E. (2022). The Effect of Audit Experience and Audit Risk on Audit Judgment with Auditor’s Perceptions of the Code of Ethics of Public Accountants as Moderating Variables. E3S Web of Conferences, 348. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202234800004

Messier, W. F. , Glover, S. M. , & Prawitt, D. F. (2019). Auditing & Assurance Services: A Systematic Approach (11th ed.). United States: McGraw-Hill.

Monroe, G., & Chung, J. (2001). A Research Note on the Effects of Gender and Task Complexity on an Audit Judgment. ECU Publications, 13. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.111

Natsir, M., Mile, Y., & Pada, T. (2023). The Effect of Profession Ethics, Independence, and Audit Expertise on Auditor Performance. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(8), e03123. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i8.3123

Nordlund, B., Lorentzon, J., & Lind, H. (2022). A note on auditing fair value of investment properties. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 40(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-01-2021-0009

O’Donnell, E., & Johnson, E. (2003). The Effects of Auditor Gender and Task Complexity on Information Processing Efficiency. International Journal of Auditing, 5, 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2001.00328.x

Oliver, J. (2018). How to fix the big four auditors. Financial Times.

Pasanda, E., & Paranoan, N. (2013). Pengaruh Gender dan Pengalaman Audit terhadap Audit Judgment. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2013.12.7207

Praditaningrum, A. S., & Indira, J. (2012). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Audit Judgement (Studi Pada BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Jawa Tengah). Jurnal Dan Prosiding SNA- Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 15.

Puspitasari. (2014). Pengaruh Profesionalisme, Kompleksitas Tugas, Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Audit Judgement (Survei Pada Beberapa Kantor Akuntan Publik).

Putra, A. M. T., & Rani, P. (2016). Pengaruh Gender, Kompleksitas Tugas, Pengalaman Auditor dan Kompetensi Profesional Terhadap Audit Judgement (Studi Empiris Pada Auditor Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Wilayah DKI Jakarta dan Tangerang Periode 2016). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(2), 80–100.

Shelton, S. W. (1999). The Effect of Experience on the Use of Irrelevant Evidence in Auditor Judgment. The Accounting Review, 74(2), 217–224. http://www.jstor.org/stable/248582

Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1971). Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6(6), 649–744. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(71)90033-X

Suharsimi Arikunto. (2010). Prosedur penelitian : suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta, 2010.

Sumartono, Ermawati, Y., & Meliana Rorong, T. (2022). Influence of experience and professional skepticism on audit judgement of government external auditors. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 26(2). https://doi.Org/10.20885/Jaai.Vol26.I

Surtiana, G. R. (2014). Pengaruh Keahlian Audit Dan Pengalaman Audit Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Studi Empiris pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Kota Bandung). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:167436804

Tampubolon, L. (2018). Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan, Pengetahuan, Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Audit Judgment. Infestasi, 14, 169. https://Doi.Org/10.21107/Infestasi.V14i2.4870

Trisnaningsih, S. (2003). Perbedaan Kinerja Auditor Dilihat Dari Segi Gender. Simposiun Nasional Akuntansi VI.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics And Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.Org/10.1126/Science.185.4157.1124

Widiastoeti, H., & Murwato, O. (2022). Pengaruh Gender, Tekanan Ketaatan, Independensi, Tekanan Anggaran Waktu, Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Audit Judgment (Studi Empiris Pada Auditor Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Wilayah Surabaya). Praja Observer: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 1(2).

Widyakusuma, A., Made, & Roekhudin, S. ; (2019). The Effect Of Professionalism And Experience On Audit Judgment With Task Complexity As A Moderating Variable. International Journal Of Multicultural And Multireligious Understanding. https://doi.Org/10.18415/ijmmu.V6i2.644666

Wilson, T., Houston, C., Etling, K., & Brekke, N. (1997). A New Look At Anchoring Effects: Basic Anchoring And Its Antecedents. Journal Of Experimental Psychology. General, 125, 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.125.4.387

Wright, W. F., & Anderson, U. (1989). Effects Of Situation Familiarity And Financial Incentives On Use Of The Anchoring And Adjustment Heuristic For Probability Assessment. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 44(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90035-6

Yudhanegara, R. M., & Lestari, E. K. (2015). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika : Panduan Praktis Menyusun Thesis, Tesis, Dan Laporan Penelitian Dengan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan Kombinasi Disertasi Dengan Model Pembelajaran Dan Kemampuan Matematis. Bandung : Refika Aditama, 2018 ©2015.

Zulaikha. (2006). Pengaruh Interaksi Gender, Kompleksitas Tugas Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Audit Judgment. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi IX, Padang.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jaroe.v7i1.34978

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Published by:

Accounting Department
Economics and Business Faculty
Syiah Kuala University
Kopelma Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia - 23111
E-ISSN: 2621-1041

 

Creative Commons License
Journal of Accounting Research, Organization and Economics by Accounting Department of Economics and Business Faculty of Syiah Kuala University is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JAROE/index.