EVALUATION OF THE PRICE WEIGHTING OF WINNERS OF PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICES IN PUBLIC PROJECTS

Abstract

Competitive tendering for public construction projects is a cornerstone for achieving cost efficiency, transparency, and fair competition in public procurement. However, persistent challenges such as inaccuracies in bid evaluation, contractor selection fraud, and suboptimal project execution hinder its effectiveness. Previous research highlights the potential of forensic accounting and merit point systems in addressing these issues, yet a significant knowledge gap remains regarding the role of bid price weighting and its implications for contractor selection in Indonesia's public sector. This study aims to fill this gap by analyzing empirical data from electronic procurement documents spanning 2017–2022. A case study method was employed, examining 107 bid submissions to assess bid price weights and their variations. Descriptive statistical tools, including mean, variance, and standard deviation, were used to analyze the data. The findings underscore the importance of adopting a more balanced evaluation framework that integrates technical quality and price. High price weighting often leads to substandard project outcomes due to inadequate planning or underqualified contractors. Conversely, best-value approaches that combine cost efficiency with technical excellence have demonstrated superior project performance. The results of the study show that:The weight of the bid price ranges from 63.75% to 99.50%; The average bid price weight is 87.63%; A standard deviation of 8.01% indicates moderate variability in the bid price weight, indicating a lack of a measurable evaluation standard.