CEO Duality, Ownership, and Readability of Financial Statement Footnotes: Some Evidence from Indonesia

Tubagus Algan Roiston, Iman Harymawan

Abstract


This study examines the association between CEO duality, CEO ownership and financial footnotes readability. The data were collected from 1,469 non-financial firms listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) between 2010 and 2018. Using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, this study unveiled a negative and significant relationship between CEO duality and financial statement footnotes. In addition, the relationship between CEO ownership and financial statement footnotes is positive and significant. Furthermore, this indicates that CEO duality expands the embarrassment and provokes opportunistic behaviour from the CEO to prioritize personal interests by exploiting potential company resources to weaken the independence of the CEO. Hence, the readability of financial footnotes is undecipherable. On the other hand, CEO ownership is more responsible for improving corporate performance, so more financial statement footnotes are readable. Therefore, this study contributes to the literature on seeking the understanding of the readability of a firm's written communication in emerging countries.


Keywords


Corporate governance; CEO duality; financial statement footnotes; ownership; readability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abels, P. B., & Martelli, J. T. (2013). CEO duality: how many hats are too many? 13(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701311316625

Abernathy, J. L., Guo, F., Kubick, T. R., & Masli, A. (2019). Financial statement footnote readability and corporate audit outcomes. Auditing, 38(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52243

Abshari, F. R., & Rahman, A. (2020). Manajemen Laba Riil Dan Keterbacaan Laporan Tahunan. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer, 12(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.33508/jako.v12i1.2211

Ajina, A., Laouiti, M., & Msolli, B. (2016). Research in International Business and Finance Guiding through the Fog: Does annual report readability reveal earnings management? Research in International Business and Finance, 38, 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.07.021

Al-ahdal, W. M., Alsamhi, M. H., Tabash, M. I., & Farhan, N. H. S. (2020). The impact of corporate governance on financial performance of Indian and GCC listed firms: An empirical investigation. Research in International Business and Finance, 51(August 2019), 101083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101083

Amiram, D., Bozanic, Z., Cox, J. D., Dupont, Q., Karpoff, J. M., & Sloan, R. (2018). Financial reporting fraud and other forms of misconduct: a multidisciplinary review of the literature. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(2), 732–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-017-9435-x

Ammari, A. El. (2021). Do CEO duality and ownership concentration impact dividend policy in emerging markets? The moderating effect of crises period. International Journal of Financial Studies, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs9040062

Antounian, C., Dah, M. A., & Harakeh, M. (2021). Excessive managerial entrenchment, corporate governance, and firm performance. Research in International Business and Finance, 56(January), 101392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101392

Aviantara, R. (2021). Scoring the financial distress and the financial statement fraud of Garuda Indonesia with «DDCC» as the financial solutions. Journal of Modelling in Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-01-2020-0017

Bernini, F., Ferretti, P., & Angelini, A. (2021). The digitalization-reputation link: a multiple case-study on Italian banking groups. Meditari Accountancy Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2021-1201

Carrillo, M. I. A., De La Cruz, A. M. P., & Chicharro, M. N. (2019). The impact of corporate governance on corruption disclosure in European Listed Firms through the implementation of directive 2014/95/EU. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(22), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226479

Chan, C. S. R., Dennis, H., & Huang, J. Y. (2020). Journal of Business Venturing Insights Less is more? Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between readability and screening evaluations across pitch competition and crowdfunding contexts . Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14(May), e00176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00176

Chatterjee, C. (2020). Board Quality and Earnings Management: Evidence from India. Global Business Review, 21(5), 1302–1324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919856958

Chychyla, R., Leone, A. J., & Minutti-Meza, M. (2019). Complexity of financial reporting standards and accounting expertise. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(1), 226–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.09.005

De Franco, G., Fogel-Yaari, H., & Li, H. (2020). Md&a textual similarity and auditors. Auditing, 39(3), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-18-016

Fu, J., Shimamoto, D., & Todo, Y. (2017). Can firms with political connections borrow more than those without? Evidence from firm-level data for Indonesia. Journal of Asian Economics, 52, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2017.08.003

García-Sánchez, I. M., Aibar-Guzmán, C., Serrano-Valdecillos, C., & Aibar-Guzmán, B. (2022). Analysis of the Dialogue with Stakeholders by the IBEX 35 Companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031913

Ginesti, G., Drago, C., Macchioni, R., & Sannino, G. (2018). Female board participation and annual report readability in firms with boardroom connections. Gender in Management, 33(4), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2017-0079

Ginesti, G., Sannino, G., & Drago, C. (2017). Board connections and management commentary readability: the role of information sharing in Italy. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 17(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2016-0015

Goergen, M., Limbach, P., & Scholz-Daneshgari, M. (2020). Firms’ rationales for CEO duality: Evidence from a mandatory disclosure regulation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65(October), 101770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101770

Gujarati, Damodar & Dawn, P. (2008). Basic Econometrics.

Habib, Ahsan & Hasan, M. M. (2018). Business strategies and annual report readability *. Accounting and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12380

Habib, A., & Monzur, M. (2019). International Review of Financial Analysis Corporate life cycle research in accounting, finance and corporate governance: A survey, and directions for future research ☆. International Review of Financial Analysis, 61(November 2018), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.12.004

Harymawan, I., Nasih, M., Madyan, M., & Sucahyati, D. (2019). The role of political connections on family firms’ performance: evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Financial Studies, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs7040055

Hassan, M. K., Abbas, B. A., & Garas, S. N. (2019). Readability, governance and performance: a test of the obfuscation hypothesis in Qatari listed fi rms. 19(2), 270–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2018-0182

Kao, L., & Chen, A. (2020). CEO characteristics and R&D expenditure of IPOs in emerging markets: Evidence from Taiwan. Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(4), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2020.01.001

Khatib, S. F. A., Abdullah, D. F., Elamer, A. A., & Abueid, R. (2021). Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 985–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2665

Kim, K., Ryu, D., & Yang, H. (2021). Information uncertainty, investor sentiment, and analyst reports. International Review of Financial Analysis, 77(November 2020), 101835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101835

Lee, D. (2019). Financial analyst coverage for U.S firms facing foreign competition: Evidence from trade liberalization. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, (September), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12111

Liu, J. (2021). Does negative information in MD&A can reduce stock crash risk? Nankai Business Review International, 12(4), 537–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-04-2021-0027

Lo, K., Ramos, F., & Rogo, R. (2017). Earnings management and annual report readability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.09.002

Malik, M. S., & Makhdoom, D. D. (2016). Does corporate governance beget firm performance in Fortune Global 500 companies? Corporate Governance (Bingley), 16(4), 747–764. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-12-2015-0156

Melón-Izco, Á., Ruiz-Cabestre, F. J., & Ruiz-Olalla, C. (2021). Readabilty in management reports: Extension and good governance Practices. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 24(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.6018/RCSAR.363171

Moreno-Ureba, E., & Bravo-Urquiza, F. (2019). Corporate governance codes compliance and environmental, social and governance disclosures. Contaduria y Administracion, 64(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22201/FCA.24488410E.2020.2388

Nguyen, H. J. (2020). Tax Avoidance and Financial Statement. European Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1811745

Ozbek, O. V., & Boyd, B. (2020). The influence of CEO duality and board size on the market value of spun-off subsidiaries: The contingency effect of firm size. Journal of Strategy and Management, 13(3), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-03-2019-0039

Pavlopoulos, A., Magnis, C., & Iatridis, G. E. (2019). Integrated reporting: An accounting disclosure tool for high quality financial reporting. Research in International Business and Finance, 49(May 2018), 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.02.007

Salehi, M., Lari Dasht Bayaz, M., Mohammadi, S., Adibian, M. S., & Fahimifard, S. H. (2020). Auditors’ response to readability of financial statement notes. Asian Review of Accounting, 28(3), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-03-2019-0066

Salehi, M., Zimon, G., & Seifzadeh, M. (2022). The Effect of Management Characteristics on Audit Report Readability. Economies, 10(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010012

Salma, I., Id, O., Eduardo, S., & Id, O. (2003). The Use of Nonfinancial Performance Measures in CEO Bonus Compensation MyoJung Cho. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 0–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12280

Sehrawat, N. K., Singh, S., & Kumar, A. (2020). Does corporate governance affect financial performance of firms? A large sample evidence from India. Business Strategy and Development, 3(4), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.126

Seifzadeh, M., Salehi, M., Abedini, B., & Ranjbar, M. H. (2021). The relationship between management characteristics and financial statement readability. EuroMed Journal of Business, 16(1), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-12-2019-0146

Sorensen, D. P., & Miller, S. E. (2017). Financial accounting scandals and the reform of corporate governance in the United States and in Italy. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 17(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2016-0125

Tahir, H., Masri, R., & Rahman, M. M. (2020). Impact of board attributes on the firm dividend payout policy: evidence from Malaysia. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(5), 919–937. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2020-0091

Tejerina-Gaite, F. A., & Fernández-Temprano, M. A. (2021). The influence of board experience on firm performance: does the director’s role matter? Journal of Management and Governance, 25(3), 685–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09520-2

Uppal, N. (2020). CEO narcissism, CEO duality, TMT agreeableness and firm performance: An empirical investigation in auto industry in India. European Business Review, 32(4), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-06-2019-0121

Vu, M., Tu, T., & Tuyen, N. (2018). Research in International Business and Finance Relationship between board ownership structure and firm fi financial performance in transitional economy: The case of Vietnam. Research in International Business and Finance, 45(January 2017), 512–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.09.002

Wijethilake, C., & Ekanayake, A. (2020). CEO duality and firm performance: the moderating roles of CEO informal power and board involvements. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(8), 1453–1474. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2018-0321

Xu, H. (2020). Annual report readability and trade credit. 19(3), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-10-2019-0221

Yen, J. C., Wang, T., & Chen, Y. H. (2021). Different is better: how unique initial coin offering language in white papers enhances success. Accounting and Finance, 61(4), 5309–5340. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12760

Zhou, C. (2019). Effects of corporate governance on the decision to voluntarily disclose corporate social responsibility reports: evidence from China. Applied Economics, 51(55), 5900–5910. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1631440

Zona, F., Gomez-mejia, L. R., & Withers, M. C. (2018). Board Interlocks and Firm Performance: Toward a Combined Agency – Resource Dependence Perspective. Management, 44(2), 589–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315579512

Zou, H. L., Zeng, S. X., Xie, L. N., & Zeng, R. C. (2015). Are Top Executives Rewarded for Environmental Performance? The Role of the Board of Directors in the Context of China. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 21(6), 1542–1565. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2014.958943




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v9i2.25569

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 43 times
PDF - 34 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Published by:

Accounting Department collaborated with IAI KAPd (Institute of Indonesia Chartered Accountant)
Faculty of Business and Economics
Syiah Kuala University
Kopelma Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia - 23111
ISSN: 2355-9462, E-ISSN: 2528-1143

 

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis by Prodi Akuntansi Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://www.jurnal.usk.ac.id/JDAB/index.