Early Management of Pseudo-Class III Malocclusion in a Growing Child with a Reverse Twin Block Appliance: A Case Report
Abstract
Background: Pseudo Class III malocclusion is characterized by an anterior crossbite with functional forward mandibular displacement. This malocclusion can prevent maxillary sagittal development, and if not intervened upon promptly, can develop into a skeletal class III malocclusion. Therefore, it is essential to avoid this malocclusion as early as possible. Case Report: A 9-year-old male child presented with the chief complaint of prominent lower teeth. Intra-oral examination showed crossbite anterior, presence of crowding, and malposition 21,22. Right molar relation class 1 and left class III, maxillary space discrepancy 6.4 mm, skeletal Class I, patient in growth and development period. Treatment was performed using a functional appliance, a reverse twin block, with additional bilateral expansion on the maxilla and a Z-spring on teeth 21 and 22. Conclusion: Management of pseudo-class III in growing children with reverse twin block has shown success in correcting the crossbite anterior, tooth malposition, and increasing the maxillary arch width.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Meidiyanto R, Ardhana W. Perawatan Maloklusi Pseudo Kelas III Dengan Alat Ortodontik Cekat Teknik Begg. Maj Kedokt Gigi Indones. 2016;19:163.
Vahidi F. Minimally invasive treatment of an adult with severe pseudo-Class III malocclusion. J Prosthodont. 2018;28:737–742.
Al-Hummayani FM. Pseudo-Class III malocclusion. Saudi Med J. 2016;37:450–456.
Alwadei S, et al. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment needs among Saudi primary school male children aged 6–12 years: A cross-sectional study. J Int Oral Heal. 2023;15:106–112.
Fernando D, Marcela C. Therapeutic management of pseudo-Class III malocclusion: Case report. 2015;3:248–254.
Hamidaddin MA. Optimal treatment timing in orthodontics: A scoping review. Eur J Dent. 2023;18:86–96.
Al-Faifi AH. Restorative management and treatment of pseudo-Class III malocclusion. Case Rep Dent. 2021;2021:1–4.
Zere E, Chaudhari PK, Saran J, Dhingra K, Tiwari N. Developing Class III malocclusions: Challenges and solutions. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018;10:99–116.
Khan Y, Naveed N, Singh M, Nagi PK. Efficacy of clear aligners in treating Class III malocclusion with mandibular molar distalization: A systematic review. Cureus. 2023;doi:10.7759/cureus.48134.
Giancotti A, Maselli A, Mampieri G, Spanò E. Pseudo-Class III malocclusion treatment with Balters’ Bionator. J Orthod. 2003;30:203–215.
Alfawzan AA. Sectional fixed orthodontic appliance for management of a pseudo-Class III malocclusion: Case report. Bangladesh J Med Sci. 2024;23:262–265.
Kravitz ND. Interceptive orthodontics with resin turbos for pseudo-Class III malocclusions. Case Rep Dent. 2019;2019:1–6.
Negi N, Negi KS. Management of pseudo-Class III malocclusion with reverse twin block: Case report. 2017;5:244–248.
Chaudhary NK, Giri J, Pokharel PR. Orthodontic management of pseudo-Class III malocclusion: A case report. J Bp Koirala Inst Heal Sci. 2022;5:48–52.
Pandey S, Gyawali R, Pokharel PR, Chaudhary A, Sangroula S. Class III correction with reverse twin block: A case report. Clin Case Reports. 2024;12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jds.v10i1.46954
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 72 timesPDF - 23 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.


All papers published in FKG USK Press are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. |
| Social Media: | | | | |









