The Relationship of Craniofacial Structure Changes in Mouth Breathing Patients to Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions: A Lateral Cephalometric Study

Mimi Marina Lubis, Siti Bahirrah, Hilda Fitria Lubis, Khalila Rumaisha

Abstract


Background: Prolonged airway obstruction during facial growth can influence the development of craniofacial structures. Conversely, craniofacial deformities may contribute to reduced airway dimensions. Understanding the relationship between craniofacial morphology and pharyngeal airway space is essential, particularly in individuals with altered breathing patterns such as mouth breathing. Objective: This study aimed to determine the differences and relationships between craniofacial structures and pharyngeal airway dimensions in patients with mouth breathing compared to those with normal nasal breathing. Methods: This study employed a descriptive-analytic research design. A total of 20 lateral cephalograms were analyzed—10 from patients with normal breathing and 10 from mouth-breathing patients, all presenting with skeletal class II malocclusion. Landmarks were identified manually, and measurements were carried out using the CorelDRAW application. The Unpaired T-test was used to assess differences between groups. The Pearson correlation test was used to examine the relationship between craniofacial structures and airway dimensions in the mouth-breathing group. Results: Significant differences were found in mandibular structure and the oropharyngeal U-MPW plane angle (p < 0.05) between mouth breathers and nasal breathers. However, no statistically significant correlation was observed between craniofacial measurements and pharyngeal airway dimensions within the mouth-breathing group. Conclusion: This study concludes that increased anteroposterior skeletal measurements and vertical facial height are not significantly associated with narrowing of pharyngeal airway dimensions in mouth-breathing patients. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to explore this relationship more comprehensively.


Keywords


Mouth breathing; Craniofacial structure; Pharyngeal airway; Cephalogram; Skeletal class II

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sherwood L. Human physiology: from cells to systems. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2016. p. 447.

Singh V. Textbook of anatomy: head, neck, and brain. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2014. p. 199–201.

Graber LW, Vig KWL, Huang GJ, Fleming PS. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. Dublin: Elsevier; 2023. p. 12, 176, 259–260, 263.

Kharbanda OP. Orthodontics: diagnosis and management of malocclusion and dentofacial deformities. India: Elsevier; 2019. p. 706, 724–728.

Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019. p. 24, 131–132.

Al-Gunaid TH, Arifin R, Narmada IB, Tarman KE. Perspectives of Indonesian orthodontists on the ideal orthodontic treatment time. J Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020;12:351–357.

Vishnoi P, Kambalyal P, Shyagali TR, Bhayya DP, Trivedi R, Jingar J. Age-wise and gender-wise prevalence of oral habits in 7–16 year old school children of Mewar ethnicity India. Indian J Dent Sci. 2017;9(3):184.

Purwanegara MK, Sutrisna B. Mouth breathing, head posture, and prevalence of adenoid facies in patients with upper respiratory tract obstruction. J Dent Indones. 2018;25(1):60–63.

Premkumar S. Essentials of orthodontics. India: Elsevier; 2020. p. 137, 214–215, 452.

Mitchell L. An introduction to orthodontics. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 45, 261.

Thilander B, Bondemark L, Bjerklin K. Essential orthodontics. United Kingdom: Wiley Blackwell; 2018. p. 34, 60.

Cobourne MT, Dibiase AT. Handbook of orthodontics. London: Elsevier; 2016. p. 85–89, 92–96, 189–192.

Shetty S, Shetty V, Bhandary M. Assessment of dentofacial characteristics and pharyngeal airway in children with Class II malocclusion and mouth breathing. J Health Allied Sci. 2023;13(2):278–288.

Li J, Zhao Z, Zheng L, Daraqel B, Liu J, Hu Y. Effects of mouth breathing on maxillofacial and airway development in children and adolescents with different cervical vertebral maturation stages: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):4–8.

Lopatiene K, Dabkute A, Juskeviciute V. Vertical and sagittal morphology of the facial skeleton and the pharyngeal airway. Stomatologija. 2016;18(1):23–24.

Kumar A, Nandi MK. Correlation between pharyngeal airway space and craniofacial morphology: a cephalometric study. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16(3):43–45.

Gu M, McGrath CPJ, Wong RWK, Hägg U, Yang Y. Cephalometric norms for the upper airway of 12-year-old Chinese children. Head Face Med. 2014;10(1):3–10.

Zhao Z, Zheng L, Huang X, Li C, Liu J, Hu Y. Effects of mouth breathing on facial skeletal development in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):4–12.

Lysy J, Karkazi F, Stanko P, Novak B. The influence of mouth breathing on skeletal and dental features of splanchnocranium. Bratisl Med J. 2021;122(3):197–199.

Ramirez-Yanez GO. Craniofacial growth and development. In: Liem E, editor. Sleep disorders in pediatric dentistry. Canada: Springer; 2019. p. 48–49, 136.

Bollhalder J. Dentofacial and upper airway characteristics of mild and severe Class II division 1 subjects. Dissertation. Zurich: University of Zurich; 2013. p. 447–453.

Mehta S, Lodha S, Valiathan A, Urala A. Mandibular morphology and pharyngeal airway space: a cephalometric study. APOS Trends Orthod. 2015;5(1):22–28.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jds.v10i1.47923

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 59 times
PDF - 14 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

Indexed by:

JDS JDS Garuda JDS JDS JDS

JDS JDS JDS JDS JDS JDS 

 
Tools:

JDS JDS JDS JDS JDS JDS

JDS JDS JDS

All papers published in FKG  USK Press are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Social Media: