Design and Validation of Science Student Worksheet based on Argument Driven Inquiry to Improve Argumentation Skills for Junior High School Students

Lismawati Lismawati*, Neni Hasnunidah, Abdurrahman Abdurrahman

Abstract


The survey results on teachers and students in six regencies/cities in Lampung Province showed that in science learning, teachers have not optimized the argumentative skills of students. Thus, this study aimed to develop and validate science worksheets oriented to the argumentative skills of students. This study used a 4D-study design with Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning model. A small-scale trial was conducted on 20 IX-graders at SMP 9 Krui Pesisir Barat. The large-scale trial was conducted on 50 IX-graders at SMP 9 Krui Pesisir Barat by purposive sampling with one experimental class and one control class. The control class used a worksheet from a particular publisher, and the experimental class used the developed worksheet. Based on the results, the ADI model worksheet can be declared valid in terms of content, construction, and language with an average of 92.3% with very high criteria. The practicality of the ADI worksheet model can be seen from the implementation of learning, student responses, and teacher responses had an average of 89.24% with very high criteria. The effectiveness of the ADI model worksheet can be seen from the ability to work on argumentation skills test questions, showing that the control class N-gain was 0.27 with low criteria and the experimental class was 0.57 with medium criteria. The effect size (SE) of 0.64 showed that the developed science worksheet was effective in developing argumentative skills of students with medium criteria


Keywords


Worksheet, Argument Driven Inquiry

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andriyani, Y. & Riandi. 2015. Peningkatan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry pada Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu di SMP Kelas VII. Edusains , 7(2):114-120.

Demircioglu, T. & Ucar, S. 2012. The Effect of Argument Driven Inquiry on Pre-service Science Teachers Attitude and Argumentation skill. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 46(2):5035-5039.

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. 2000. Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms. Science education, 84(3) 287-312.

Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. 2007. Taking Science to School: Teaching Science in Grades K-8, National Academies Press, Washington DC.

Faize, F.A., Husain, W., & Nisar, F. 2018. A Critical Review of Scientific Argumentation in Science Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1):475–483.

Fatmawati, I.N. & Utari, S. 2015. Penerapan Levels of Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP Tema Limbah dan Upaya Penanggulangannya. Edusains, 7(2):151-159. http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/edusains.

Fraenkell, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. 2008. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, McGraw-Hill, New York, US.

Ginanjar, W.S., Utari, S., & Muslim. 2015. Penerapan Model Argument Driven Inqury dalam Pembelajaran IPA untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 20(1):32-37. doi:10.18269/jpmipa.v20i1.559. http://dx.doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i1.559.

Hadiwidodo, S., Tukiran., & Taufikurahmah, T. 2017. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Kimia Model Argument Driven Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Argumentasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 7(1):1416-1421.

Jaber, L.Z. & Hammer, D. 2016. Learning to feel like a scientist, Science Education, (100):189–220.

Jackson, P.T. 2016. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics, 2nd edition, New York, Routledge.

Kemdikbud. 2013. Buku Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Kurikulum 2013: SMP/MTs Kelas IX Semester 1, Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang, Kemdikbud, Jakarta. 310 hlm.

Khusnayain, A. 2017. Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Berbasis Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) untuk Menumbuhkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah. Tesis, Departemen Fisika, Univesitas Lampung, Indonesia.

Kuhn, D. 2010. Teaching and Learning Science as Argument, Science Education, 6-17.

Lazarou, D., Sutherland, R., & Erduran, S. 2016. Argumentation in Science Education as a Systemic Activity: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 7(9):150–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.008

Marhamah, O.S., Nurlaelah I., & Setiawati, I. 2017. Penerapan Model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa pada Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan di Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Ciawigebang. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Biologi, 9(2):39-45.

McNeill, K. L., Katsh-Singer, R., González-Howard, M., & Loper, S. 2016. Factors Impacting Teachers’ Argumentation Instruction in Their Science Classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12):2026–2046. https://doi.org/10. 1080/09500693.2016.1221547

Mulyasa, E. 2007. Menjadi Guru Professional, Rosda Karya, Bandung.

Muslim & Suhandi, A. 2012. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Sekolah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif dan Keterampilan Berargumentasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 8(1):174-183.

OECD. 2016. PISA 2015 Result in Focus, Paris: OECD

Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. 2008. Assessment of the Ways Students Generate Arguments in Science Education, Current Perspectives and Recommendations for Future Directions.

Sampson, V., & Gleim, L. 2009. Argument Driven Inquiry to Promote the Understanding of Important Concepts & Practices in Biology. The American Biology Teacher, 71 (8):465-471.

Sampson, V., Hester, M., Enderle, P.J., & Groom, J. 2012. The Develovment of Science Proficiency Argument Focused Lab Instruction in High School Biology, Paper Presented at The Annual International Conference of The American Educational Research Association (AERA), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Schwarz, B.B. & Baker, M. J. 2017. Dialogue, argumentation and education: history theory and practice, Cambridge University Press, New York.

Squire, K. & Mingfong. 2007. Develoving Scientific Argumentation Skills with a Place-Based Augmented Reality Game on Handheld Computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1):43-51

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S., & Semmel, M.I. 1974. Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children a Sourcbook, National Center For Improvement of Educational System, Minnesota.

Wardani, A.D. 2016. Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah dan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Siswa SMA pada Materi Gaya dan Gerak. Pros. Semhas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, 1(1):13-28. ISBN: 978-602-9286-21-2.

Wellington, J. & Osborne, J. 2001. Language and Literacy in Science Education, Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA.

Yasir, M., Susanti, E. & Isnawati. 2013. Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta didik (LKS) Berbasis Strategi Metakognitif untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta didik pada Materi Pewarisan Sifat. Jurnal Bioedu, 2(1):77-83.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v5i3.22079

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA



JIPI (Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA)

ISSN 2614-0500  (print) | 2620-553X (online)
Organized by Universitas Syiah Kuala 
Published by Master of Science Education Study Program Graduate School Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Website : http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/jipi
Email     : jipi@usk.ac.id

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.