Is Matter Still A “Matter” for Undergraduate Students? An Exploratory Study in Indonesia

Ananda Hafizhah Putri*, Andi Suhandi, Achmad Samsudin, Supriyadi Supriyadi, Bayram Coştu

Abstract


Many studies have focused on students’ conceptions about the concepts of matter found that students from various levels of education have difficulty in comprehending the states and/or changes of matter. The present study aims to explore undergraduate students’ conception regarding the states and changes of matter. A total of 16 first to third year university students from physics education and science education department voluntarily participated in the study. We employed semi-structured interviews with each participant in order to elicit students’ conceptions and alternative conceptions regarding the states and changes of matter. Students were also prompted to make their own molecular illustration during the interview. The present study found that undergraduate students had difficulty in connecting between macroscopic and microscopic concept levels of the states and changes of matter. Furthermore, students developed several alternative conceptions in terms of temperature, volume, mass, and density of an object during phase changes. Undergraduate students also tended to give fewer explanation about transformation on liquid and gas phases due to poor understanding of particulate nature of liquid and gas, molecular bonds in particular. The study suggests the necessity of developing instruction with more contextual learning and the use of dynamic visual media to enhance undergraduate students' comprehensive understanding of the states and changes of matter.

Keywords


undergraduate students, conceptions, the states and changes of matter, phase changes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adadan, E., & Ataman, M.M. 2021. Promoting senior primary school students' understanding of particulate nature of matter through inquiry instruction with multiple representations. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 49(3):317-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1854960

Adbo, K., & Taber, K.S. 2009. Learners’ mental models of the particle nature of matter: A study of 16‐year‐old Swedish science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6):757-786. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701799383

Blair, E. 2015. A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 6(1):14-29. https://doi.org/10. 2458/v6i1.18772

Çelebi, Ö. 2004. Effect of conceptual change-oriented instruction on removing misconceptions about phase changes (Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University).

Chang, J.Y. 1999. Teachers college students' conceptions about evaporation, condensation, and boiling. Science Education, 83(5):511-526. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199909)83:5<511::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E

Chi, M.T. 2005. Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2):161-199. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1

Chiou, G.L. 2009. Exploring beyond mental models: An interview-based study of students' in-depth understanding of heat conduction from a multi-dimensional cognitive perspective. Columbia University.

Chiu, M.H., & Wu, W.L. 2013. A novel approach for investigating students’ learning progression for the concept of phase transitions. Educación Química, 24(4):373-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(13)72490-X

Coştu, B., & Ayas, A. 2005. Evaporation in different liquids: Secondary students’ conceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1):75-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140500068476

Coştu, B., Ayas, A., & Niaz, M. 2010. Promoting conceptual change in first year students’ understanding of evaporation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(1):5-16. https://doi.org/10.1039/C001041N

Coştu, B., Ayas, A., & Niaz, M. 2012. Investigating the effectiveness of a POE-based teaching activity on students’ understanding of condensation. Instructional Science, 40:47-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9169-2

Coştu, F. 2023a. Prospective science teachers are good at which of three types of tests: algorithmic, conceptual and graphical comparison. Research in Science & Technological Education, 43(1):107-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023. 2235293.

Coştu, F. 2023b. Gifted students’ performance on algorithmic, conceptual and graphical questions. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 22(4):600-614. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.00

Crespo, M.Á.G., & Pozo, J.I. 2004. Relationships between everyday knowledge and scientific knowledge: understanding how matter changes. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11):1325-1343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000 205350

Devetak, I., Hajzeri, M., Glažar, S.A., & Vogrinc, J. 2010. The influence of different models on 15-years-old students' understanding of the solid state of matter. Acta chimica slovenica, 57(4):904-913. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24061894/

Eilam, B. 2004. Drops of water and of soap solution: Students' constraining mental models of the nature of matter. Journal of research in science teaching, 41(10):970-993. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20034

Franco, A.G., & Taber, K.S. 2009. Secondary students’ thinking about familiar phenomena: Learners’ explanations from a curriculum context where ‘particles’ is a key idea for organising teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14):1917-1952. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802307730

Gkitzia, V., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. 2020. Students’ competence in translating between different types of chemical representations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1):307-330. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00301G

Gopal, H., Kleinsmidt, J., & Case, J. 2004. An investigation of tertiary students’ understanding of evaporation, condensation and vapor pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13):1597–1620. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069 0410001673829

Habiddin, H., & Page, E.M. 2021. Examining students’ ability to solve algorithmic and pictorial style questions in chemical kinetics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(1):65-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10037-w

Hatzinikita, V., Koulaidis, V., & Hatzinikitas, A. 2005. Modeling pupils' understanding and explanations concerning changes in matter. Research in Science Education, 35:471-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-8321-2

Johnson, P. 1998. Children’s understanding of changes of state involving the gas state, part 1: boiling water and the particle theory. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5):567–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200505

Johnson, P., & Papageorgiou, G. 2010. Rethinking the introduction of particle theory: A substance‐based framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2):130-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20296

Kirbulut, Z.D., & Beeth, M.E. 2013. Representations of fundamental chemistry concepts in relation to the particulate nature of matter. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(2):96-106. https://ijemst.com/index.php/ ijemst/article/view/280/pdf

Kikas, E. 2003. University students' conceptions of different physical phenomena. Journal of Adult Development, 10:139-150. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023410212892

Lanrezac, A., Férey, N., & Baaden, M. 2022. Wielding the power of interactive molecular simulations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 12(4):e1594. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1594

Lee, O., Eichinger, D.C., Anderson, C.W., Berkheimer, G.D., & Blakeslee, T.D. 1993. Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3):249-270. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.366 0300304

Munfaridah, N., Avraamidou, L., & Goedhart, M. 2021. The use of multiple representations in undergraduate physics education: what do we know and where do we go from here?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1):em1934. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9577

Othman, J., Treagust, D.F., & Chandrasegaran, A.L. 2008. An investigation into the relationship between students’ conceptions of the particulate nature of matter and their understanding of chemical bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 30(11):1531-1550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701459897

Özmen, H. 2011a. Effect of animation enhanced conceptual change texts on 6th grade students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and transformation during phase changes. Computers & Education, 57(1):1114-1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2010.12.004

Özmen, H. 2011b. Turkish primary students' conceptions about the particulate nature of matter. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(1):99-121. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ930287.pdf

Øyehaug, A.B., & Holt, A. 2013. Students' understanding of the nature of matter and chemical reactions–a longitudinal study of conceptual restructuring. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4):450-467. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP0 0027C

Paik, S.H., Kim, H.N., Cho, B.K., & Park, J.W. 2004. K‐8th grade Korean students' conceptions of ‘changes of state’ and ‘conditions for changes of state’. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2):207-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690320 00052063

Papageorgiou, G., & Johnson, P. 2005. Do particle ideas help or hinder pupils’ understanding of phenomena?. International Journal of Science Education, 27(11):1299-1317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500102698

Pavlin, J., Vaupotič, N., Glažar, S.A., Čepič, M., & Devetak, I. 2011. Slovenian pre-service teachers’ conceptions about liquid crystals. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(3):173-180. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75193

Putri, A.H., Suhandi, A., & Samsudin, A. 2023. Identify the understanding of the physical meaning of high school students towards physics quantities and its sources. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2734(110006):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0155407

Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. 2011. Conceptual versus algorithmic problem-solving: Focusing on problems dealing with conservation of matter in chemistry. Research in Science Education, 41(4):587–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9181-6

Samarapungavan, A., Bryan, L., & Wills, J. 2017. Second graders’ emerging particle models of matter in the context of learning through model‐based inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(8):988-1023. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21394

Samarapungavan, A., Bryan, L.A., Staudt, C., Sapkota, B., Will Pinto, H.E., Broadhead, J.M., & Kimball, N. 2023. Using technology‐mediated inquiry to help young learners reimagine the visible world through simple particle models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(2):390-422. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21802

Savasci-Acikalin, F. 2021. How middle school students represent phase change and interpret textbook representations: A comparison of student and textbook representations. Research in Science Education, 51:1651-1685. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11165-019-9834-z

Slapničar, M., Tompa, V., Glažar, S.A., & Devetak, I. 2018. Fourteen-year-old students' misconceptions regarding the sub-micro and symbolic levels of specific chemical concepts. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(4):620-632. http://dx.doi.org/10. 33225/jbse/18.17.620

Tytler, R. 2000. A comparison of Year 1 and Year 6 students' conceptions of evaporation and condensation: Dimensions of conceptual progression. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5):447-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289723

Wiebe, R., & Stinner, A. 2010. Using story to help student understanding of gas behavior. Interchange, 41:347-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-010-9135-y

Yang, C., Noh, T., Scharmann, L.C., & Kang, S. 2014. A study on the elementary school teachers’ awareness of students’ alternative conceptions about change of states and dissolution. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23:683-698. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s40299-013-0140-7

Yaseen, Z. 2018. Using student-generated animations: The challenge of dynamic chemical models in states of matter and the invisibility of the particles. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4):1166-1185. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00136G




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v9i2.45861

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 53 times
PDF - 17 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA


JIPI (Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA)

ISSN 2614-0500  (print) | 2620-553X (online)
Organized by Universitas Syiah Kuala 
Published by Master of Science Education Study Program Graduate School Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Website : http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/jipi
Email     : jipi@usk.ac.id

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.