Teacher Role and Domain of Expertise in the 21st Century: Evidence from Preservice Biology Teacher

Reni Marlina*, Hadi Suwono, Chokchai Yuenyong, Ibrohim Ibrohim, Hamdani Hamdani

Abstract


This research focuses on biology education students' perspectives regarding teacher roles and domains of expertise in the 21st century identified from micro teaching courses. The aimed of this study was to describe the types of teacher roles that emerge in teaching practice in micro teaching courses and identify domains of expertise based on the perceptions of prospective biology teacher students while attending micro teaching courses. This research method is a qualitative based on the lesson study framework. The research instruments used questionnaires, interviews, and the observation of the learning process. The research results show that there are weaknesses in the domain of expertise needed in the 21st century, which consists of mastery of content/material, technology and pedagogy. Suggestions for further research are that good cooperation between universities and partners in schools is needed by forming the lesson study for learning communities (LSLC). This LSLC can develop the competencies of prospective biology teacher students, especially those related to pedagogical, technological, and concept mastery competencies on an ongoing basis

Keywords


teachers’ role, domain of expertise, preservice biology teacher

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbas, S., Umangap, W.A., & Amin, A.M. 2023. Collaborative group investigation and self efficacy on preservice science teachers’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 11(1):1-11 https://doi.org/10. 24815/jpsi.v11i1.26614

Anderson, R.C. 2021. Reflection in the creative process of early adolescents: the mediating roles of creative metacognition, self-efficacy, and self-concept. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(4):612–626.https://doi.org/10.1037/ aca0000324

Asakereh, A. 2018. Reflective thinking, self-efficacy, self-esteem and academic achievement of iranian efl students. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(1):68–89. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2018.2896

Bakar, N.S.A., Maat, S.M., & Rosli, R. 2020. Mathematics teacher’s self-efficacy of technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2):256–276. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10818. 259-276

Cai, J., Yang, H.H., Gong, D., MacLeod, J., & Zhu, S. 2019. Understanding the continued use of flipped classroom instruction: A personal beliefs model in Chinese higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(1):137–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9196-y

Cai, Y., Wang, L., Bi, Y., & Tang, R. 2022. How can the professional community influence teachers’ work engagement? The Mediating Role of Teacher Self-Efficacy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(16):1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610029

Cañabate, D., Nogué, L., Serra, T., & Colomer, J. 2019. Supportive peer feedback in tertiary education: analysis of preservice teachers’ perceptions. Education Sciences, 9(4):1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040280

Chai, C.S., Rahmawati, Y., & Jong, M.S.Y. 2020. Indonesian science, mathematics, and engineering preservice teachers’ experiences in stem-tpack design-based learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(21):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219050

Ciampa, K. 2017. Building bridges between technology and content literacy in special education: lessons learned from special educators’ use of integrated technology and perceived benefits for students. Literacy Research and Instruction, 56(2):85–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2017.1280863

Çoban, G.Ü., Akpinar, E., Baran, B., Saǧlam, M.K., Özcan, E., & Kahyaoǧlu, Y. 2016. The evaluation of “Technological pedagogical content knowledge based argumentation practices” training for science teachers. Egitim ve Bilim, 41(188):1–33. https://doi. org/10.15390/EB.2016.6615

Doukakis, S., Chionidou-Moskofoglou, M., Mangina-Phelan, E., & Roussos, P. 2010. Measuring technological and content knowledge of undergraduate primary teachers in mathematics. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 73:405–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13166-0_57

Fujii, T. 2019. Designing and Adapting tasks in lesson planning: A critical process of the lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48:411-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-030-04031-433

Gill, L. & Dalgarno, B. 2017. A qualitative analysis of preservice primary school teachers’ TPACK development over the four years of their teacher preparation programme. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(4):439–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475 939X.2017.1287124

Großschedl, J., Welter, V., & Harms, U. 2019. A new instrument for measuring pre-service biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge: The PCK-IBI. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(4):402–439. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21482

Harden, R. & Crosby, J.R. 2000. The good teacher is more than a lecturer-the twelve roles of the teacher. Medical Teacher, 22(4):334-347. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2023. 112015

Jimoyiannis, A. 2010. Developing a Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework for Science Education: Implications of a Teacher Trainers’ Preparation Program. Proceedings of the 2010 InSite Conference, 6:597–607. https://doi.org/ 10.28945/1277

Kaplon-Schilis, A. & Lyublinskaya, I. 2019. Analysis of relationship between five domains of TPACK framework: TK, PK, CK Math, CK science, and TPACK of preservice special education teachers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1):25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09404-x

Karlström, M. & Hamza, K. 2019. Preservice science teachers’ opportunities for learning through reflection when planning a microteaching unit. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(1):44–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1531345

Kotzebue, L. 2022. Beliefs, self-reported or performance-assessed tpack: what can predict the quality of technology-enhanced biology lesson plans? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(5):570–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09974-z

Kotzebue, L. 2023. Two is better than one—Examining biology-specific TPACK and its T-dimensions from two angles. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(3):765–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2030268

Louis, V.N. & King, N.S. 2022. Emancipating STEM education through abolitionist teaching: a research-practice partnership to support virtual microteaching experiences. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(2):206–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X. 2021.2012957

Luo, L., Zhang, H., Tao, Y., Yang, X., Yan, B., & Wang, Y. 2018. A study on characteristics of TPACK structure for MOOC teachers. Proceedings - 6th International Conference of Educational Innovation Through Technology, EITT 3:5–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ EITT.2017.10

Marlina, R., Puspaningrum, H., & Hamdani, H. 2017. Differentiation of test items between the high school biology olimpiad in North Kayong and The National Science Olimpiad. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2):245-261. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2. 10679

Marli̇na, R., Suwono, H., Yuenyong, C., Ibrohim, I., Mahanal, S., Saefi̇, M., & Hamdani̇, H. 2023. Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for preservice biology teachers: two insights more promising. Participatory Educational Research, 10(6): 245–265. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.99.10.6

Murphy, O.D. 2022. An action research investigation of the impact of using online feedback videos to promote self-reflection on the microteaching of preservice EFL teachers. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 35(3):327–343. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11213-021-09575-8

Muthmainnah, R. & Nurkamilah, S. 2022. Biology teachers’ tpack self-efficacy in practical work during distance learning. Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 25(1):157–171. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2022v25n1i14

Nasution, T., Meliani, F., Purba, R., Saputra, N., & Herman, H. 2023. Participation performance of students’ basic teaching skills in microteaching. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2):2441-2448. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2307

Nevrita, N., Asikin, N., & Amelia, T. 2020. Analisis kompetensi TPACK pada media pembelajaran guru biologi SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 8(2):203–217. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi. v8i2.16709

Ogegbo, A.A., Gaigher, E., & Salagaram, T. 2019. Benefits and challenges of the lesson study: A case of teaching physical sciences in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 39(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n1a1680

Otero, J.A. & Torres, M.L.L.Y. 2018. Education in sustainable development goals using the spatial data infrastructures and the TPACK model. Education Sciences, 8(4):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040171

Paristiowati, M., Yusmaniar, Fazar Nurhadi, M., & Imansari, A. 2019. Analysis of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) of prospective chemistry teachers through The lesson study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(4):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042069

Pham, N.K.T. 2022. Vietnamese students’ perspectives on online micro-teaching (OMT) as a technique in english teacher education in the 4.0 Era. AsiaCall Online Journal, 13(1):40-72. https://doi.org/10.11251/acoj.13.01.003

Plessis, A.E.D, Wheeley, E., Klieve, H., & Park, E. 2023. The out-of-field phenomenon: Perceptive consequences and support needs through the Lens of graduating second career preservice teachers. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(1):8-27. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.01.09

Putri, D.R., Harahap, R.D., & Siregar, S.U. 2023. Difficulty analysis of biology education students in learning microteaching at Universitas Labuhanbatu. Bio-Inoved : Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan, 5(2):236-242. https://doi.org/10.20527/bino.v5i2. 15593

Reyes, V., Reading, C., Rizk, N., Gregory, S., & Doyle, H. 2016. An exploratory analysis of TPACK perceptions of preservice science teachers: A regional Australian perspective. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 12(4):1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2016100101

Rigelman, N.M. & Ruben, B. 2012. Creating foundations for collaboration in schools: Utilizing professional learning communities to support teacher candidate learning and visions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(7):979–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.05.004

Schipper, T. M., de Vries, S., Goei, S. L., & van Veen, K. 2020. Promoting a professional school culture through the lesson study? An examination of school culture, school conditions, and teacher self-efficacy. Professional Development in Education, 46(1):112–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1634627

Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. 2021. Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of preservice teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115(106586):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586

Sithole, N. V. 2023. The efficacy of microteaching in a teacher education programme during the lockdown at a University in South Africa. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(2):76-90. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter. 22.2.5

Suryawati, E., Linggasari, M.N., & Arnentis, A. 2017. Technological pedagogical and content knowledge of biology prospective teachers. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 9(3):498-504. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v9i3.11270

Suyamto, J., Masykuri, M., & Sarwanto, S. 2020. Analisis kemampuan TPACK (technolgical, pedagogical, and content, knowledge) guru biologi sma dalam menyusun perangkat pembelajaran materi sistem peredaran darah. Inkuiri: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 9(1):44-53. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v9i1.41381

Tafli, T. & Atici, T. 2016. The opinions of pre- service biology teachers’ about the context of teachers’ skills in technological pedagogical content knowledge. European Journal of Education Studies, 2(9):21–36. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.165861

Tokmak, H.S., Incikabi, L., & Ozgelen, S. 2013. An investigation of change in mathematics, science, and literacy education preservice teachers’ TPACK. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4):407–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0040-2

Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. 2017. A comprehensive investigation of TPACK within preservice teachers’ ICT profiles: Mind the gap! Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3):46–60. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3504

Wilson, M.L., Ritzhaupt, A.D., & Cheng, L. 2020. The impact of teacher education courses for technology integration on preservice teacher knowledge: A meta-analysis study. Computers and Education, 18(4):692-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu. 2020.103941

Yeşi̇Lçinar, S. & Aykan, A. 2022. The lesson study and 21st-century skills: Preservice Teachers Reason, Produce and Share. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3):315–329. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.68.9.3

Zaeni, A., Rahayu, W., & Makmuri, M. 2021. Pengembangan instrumen self assessment technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) calon guru matematika berbasis HOTs. Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika, 6(1):59-68. https://doi.org/10.25157/teorema.v6i1.4960

Zalavra, E. & Makri, K. 2022. Relocating online a technology-enhanced microteaching practice in teacher education: Challenges and implications. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(3):270–283.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v12i2.35985

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Reni Marlina, Hamdani Hamdani


Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education)

ISSN 2338-4379  (print) | 2615-840X (online)
Organized by Universitas Syiah Kuala 
Published by Master of Science Education Study Program Graduate School Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Website : http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/jpsi
Email     : jpsi@usk.ac.id

  

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.