AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION AND DIFFICULTY LEVELS OF LINGUISTIC QUESTIONS ON COGNITIVE DOMAIN IN INDONESIAN SUBJECT AT GRADE EIGHT OF SMP 1 TAKENGON

Harfiandi Harfiandi

Abstract


This study aims (1) to describe the distribution of linguistic questions of cognitive domain on the second semester final exam year 2013/2014 in Indonesian subject at Grade Eight of SMP 1 Takengon and (2) to describe the difficulty levels of linguistic questions of cognitive domain on the second semester final exam year 2013/2014 in Indonesian subject at Grade Eight of SMP 1 Takengon. The method used in this research is a quantitative descriptive. Data were obtained through documentation techniques. The results of this study show that (1) there are several levels the distribution of linguistic questions of cognitive domain on the second semester final exam year 2013/2014 in Indonesian subject at Grade Eight of SMP 1 Takengon i.e. C1 level items at 54% classified as unbalanced, C2 level items at 23% classified as unbalanced, C3 level items at 17% classified as unbalanced, and C4 level items at 6% classified as unbalanced and (2) there are the difficulty levels of linguistic questions of cognitive domain on the second semester final exam year 2013/2014 in Indonesian subject at Grade Eight of SMP 1 Takengon i.e. category of the easy items at 57% classified as unbalanced, category of the medium items at 37% classified as unbalanced, and category of the difficult items at 6% classified as unbalanced. From results of this study proved that (1) the distribution of linguistic questions on cognitive domain not balanced by the percentage proportion balancing of the items for grade of the SMP and (2) the difficulty levels of linguistic questions on cognitive domain not balanced by the percentage proportion balancing for amount of the items. Thus, an evaluation of distribution and difficulty levels of linguistic questions on cognitive domain on the second semester final exam year 2013/2014 in Indonesian subject at Grade Eight of SMP 1 Takengon still require adjustments in the future.

References


Athanassiou, Nicholas dkk. 2003. Critical Thinking in the Management Classroom: Bloom's Taxonomy as a Learning Tool. Journal of Management Education, (online). Vol. 27 No. 5. (http://jme.sagepub.com/-content/27/5/533, diakses 14 April 2014).

Arikunto, Suharsimi (Ed). 2013. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Daryanto. 2010. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Djaali dan Muljono. 2008. Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Djiwandono, M. Soenardi. 1996. Tes Bahasa dalam Pengajaran. Bandung: ITB.

--------. 2008. Tes Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Macanan Jaya Cemerlang.

Eisner, Elliot W. 2000. Prospects: The Quarterly Review of Comparative Education. Journal International Bureau of Education, (online). Vol. 30 No. 3. (http://www.google.com/url, diakses 15 April 2014).

Guskey, Thomas R. 2007. Closing Achievement Gaps: Revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom's Learning for Mastery. Journal of Advanced Academics (online). Vol 19 No. 1 (http://joa.sagepub.com/content/19/1/8, diakses 14 April 2014).

Hamalik, Oemar. 2008. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Harjanto. 2010. Perencanaan Pengajaran. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Ibrahim, R. dan Nana Syaodih S. Perencanaan Pengajaran. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Maryati dan Sutopo. 2008. Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia 2. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Mulyasa, E. (Ed). 2006. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 2009. Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Yogyakarta: Anggota IKAPI.

Patel, Rambhai N. 2010. Educational Evaluation: Theory and Practice (online). Mumbai: Himalaya Publishing House.

Peng, Samuel S. dkk. 2009. Educational Evaluation in East Asia: Emerging Issues and Challenges (online). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated.

Purwanto, M. Ngalim (Ed.). 2012. Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sanjaya, Wina. 2010. Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sudijono, Anas. 2008. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Sudjana, Nana. 2009. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sunarto dan Agung Hartono. 2002. Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih (Ed.). 2005. Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

--------. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 1986. Menyimak sebagai suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

--------. 2005. Membaca sebagai suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

--------. 2005. Menulis sebagai suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

--------. 2007. Berbicara sebagai suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Tayibnapis, Farida Yusuf. 2008. Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Thoha, M. Chabib. 2003. Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Wirajaya, Asep Yudha dan Sudarmawarti. 2008. Berbahasa dan Bersastra Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24173/mb.v8i1.22152

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) - 0 times PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



MASTER BAHASA (JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAN SASTRA INDONESIA)

ISSN 2337-4462  (print) | ISSN 2655-0040 (online)
Organized by Universitas Syiah Kuala 
Published by Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia FKIP Universitas Syiah Kuala
Website : http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/mb
Email     : mpbsippsunsyiah@gmail.com

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.   

 

Flag Counter View My Stats