The Integration of Judicial Review in Indonesia

Airlangga Gama Shakti, Maharani Wicahyaning Tyas, M. Lutfi Rizal Farid

Abstract


The judicial review is the essence of constitutional justice. At this time, Indonesia has adopted a dualism system in judicial review, which creates problems. This study aims to analyze the current judicial review system and examine the integration of judicial review by the Constitutional Court as ius constituendum. In reviewing the legal problems in this research, the Constitutional Court used the juridical-normative method. Furthermore, this research also uses a regulatory approach and a comparative study in Austria and Germany. The results show that Articles 24A and 24C of the Indonesia Constitutionhave delegated the Supreme Court the right to judicial review of regulations under the law, while the Constitutional Court has judicial review against the Indonesia Constitution. This raises problems, from practice to the difficulty of guarding the hierarchy of norms from Regional Regulations to the Indonesia Constitution. Judicial review at the Supreme Court also still has problems, especially transparency and accountability, because they have a closed nature. If analyzed in Austria, the Constitutional Court has the authority to judicial review the constitutionality of laws and the legality of administrative regulations (policies). In Germany, the Federal Constitutional Court has the authority to judicial review the law against the constitution. Therefore, there is a need for an urgency to integrate the judicial review by the Constitutional Court through the Amendment to the Indonesia Constitutionand several revisions to the regulations.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Fatih, S. (2017). Model Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Satu Atap Melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 25(2), 247–260.

Andalas, P. S. K. F. (2016). Perkembangan Pengujian Perundang- Undangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(6), 147–224. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk%x

Aris, T. W. (2020). Urgensi Judicial Review Satu Atap Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. de Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.33387/dejure.v1i2.1930

Armia, M. S. (2017). Constitutional Courts and Judicial Review: Lesson Learned for Indonesia. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 8(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v8i1.940

Asshiddiqie, J. (2005). Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara. Konstitusi Pers.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2015). Konstitusi Bernegara (Praksis Kenegaraan Bermartabat dan Demokratis). Setara Press.

Aung, N. N. (2022). The Basis of Constitutional Adjudication in Germany. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no1.2419

Badan Pengkajian MPR RI. (2017). Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Satu Atap di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Badan Pengkajian MPR RI.

Butt, S. (2019). The Indonesian Constitutional Court: Reconfiguring Decentralization for Better or Worse? Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 14(1), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2018.19

Chalid, H., & Yaqin, A. A. (2019). Menggagas Pelembagaan Constitutional Question Melalui Perluasan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Undang-Undang. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(2), 363–390. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1628

Constitutional Court Austria, C. C. A. (2010). The Constitutional Court. Janetschek, 3860 Heidenreichstein. https://www.vfgh.gv.at/downloads/VfGH_Broschuere_eng_barrierefrei_Final.pdf

Corkin, N. C. (2011). Developments in abstract judicial review in Germany, Austria and Italy [University of Birmingham]. https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/2835/

Dicosola, M., Fasone, C., & Spigno, I. (2015). Foreword: Constitutional Courts in the European Legal System After the Treaty of Lisbon and the Euro-Crisis. German Law Journal, 16(6), 1317–1330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200021155

Dwisvimiar, I. (2011). Keadilan dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(3), 522–531. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.3.179

Faber, R. (2008). The Austrian Constitutional Court – An Overview. ICL Journal, 2(1), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2008-0105

Faiz, P. M. (2016). Legal Problems of Dualism of Judicial Review System in Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 16(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.2.535

Hasani, I., Halili, H., & Balakrishnan, V. (2022). Undelivered constitutional justice? Study on how the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia are executed. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 19(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v19i1.48378

Hidayat, N. A., & Sari, M. (2018). Dualisme Judicial Review Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 7(3), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2018.v07.i03.p04

Junaenah, I. (2016). Tafsir Konstitusional Pengujian Peraturan di Bawah Undang-Undang. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(3), 503–529. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1332

Kelsen, H. (1945). General Theory of Law and State. Russell & Russell.

Kommers, D. P. (2019). German Constitutionalism: A Prolegomenon. German Law Journal, 20(4), 534–556. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.46

Lohse, E. J. (2015). The German Constitutional Court and Preliminary References—Still a Match not Made in Heaven? German Law Journal, 16(6), 1491–1508. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200021234

Mahkamah Agung RI, M. A. R. (2022). Summary Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung RI. https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/summary-laporan-tahunan-mahkamah-agung-ri

Mahkamah Konstitusi, M. K. (2022). Rekapitulasi Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang | Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.RekapPUU&menu=4

Marquez, X. (2011). Knowledge and Law in Plato’s Statesman and Laws: A Response to Klosko. Political Studies, 59(1), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00850.x

Meidiana, M. (2019). Integrasi Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-undangan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 381–408. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.381-408

Polamolo, S. (2016). “Nalar Fenomenologi”; Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pusaran Kekuasaan dan Bahaya Krisis Weltanschauung. Jurnal Konstitusi, 11(2), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk%x

Pratiwi, L. G. (2020). Kewenangan Uji Material (Judicial Review) terhadap Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. SASI, 26(4), 514–526. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i4.268

Putra, A. (2018). Dualisme Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 15(2), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v15i2.172

Qamar, N. (2014). Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 1(1), 1–15.

Siahaan, M. (2021). Integrasi Konstitusional Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(4), 729–752. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1742

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2003). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suparto, S. (2021). Problematika Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Mahkamah Agung (Kajian Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 65 P/HUM/2018). SASI, 27(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.417

Tiara, H., & Zuhri, M. (2017). Mekanisme Pemeriksaan Dalam Persidangan Hak Uji Materiil Di Mahkamah Agung. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Kenegaraan, 1(2), 60–70.

Triningsih, A. (2016). Politik Hukum Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Penyelenggaraan Negara. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(1), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1316

Zaky, M. (2016). Perbandingan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia Dengan Germany Federal Constitutional Court dan Implikasinya Secara Global. Transnasional-Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 11(1), 27–37.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v6i3.26940

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Copyright (c) 2023 Syiah Kuala Law Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License

Syiah Kuala Law Journal published by Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SKLJ.