LEGAL STUDY ON THE ACTION OF PKPU ADMINISTRATORS THAT CONDUCTED ILLEGAL INCREASE OF CREDITORS’ RECEIVABLES

Margareth Rae Sita

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the implementation of the duties and authorities of the Administrator in compiling the number of PKPU Creditors' receivables and the legal liability of the Administrator who illegally enlarges the number of PKPU Creditors' receivables using a normative juridical approach. This study concludes with several results. Firstly, the task and authority of the Administrator in compiling the number of Creditors' receivables based on Law Number 37 of 2004 is to receive all claims from Creditors and then match these claims with notes and reports held by the Debtor. In practice, some Administrators do not match claims in compiling the number of receivables. Secondly, the Administrator who illegally enlarges the number of PKPU Creditors' receivables can be held legally responsible based on Law Number 37 of 2004. If it has harmed the Debtor's assets, the Administrator can be sued through civil law based on Articles 1365 and 1366 of the Indonesian Civil Code.


Keywords


PKPU, Administrator, Debtor, Creditor, Supervisory Judge.

References


Books

Agustina, R. (2003). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Fuady, M. (2002). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (1st ed.). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sunarmi. (2010). Hukum Kepailitan (2nd ed.). Jakarta: PT Sofmedia.

Journal Articles

Ali, T. H. S. (2018). Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Dalam Rangka Mencegah Kepailitan (Studi Kasus Putusan PKPU PT. Asmin Koalindo Tuhup Di Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat). Law Review, 17(3), 205-228.

Amboro, F. Y. P. (2020). Restrukturisasi Utang Terhadap Perusahaan Go Public Dalam Kepailitan Dan PKPU. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(1), 103-111.

Damlah, J. (2017). Akibat Hukum Putusan Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Lex Crimen, 6(2), 91-98.

Ismail, A. (2021). Analisis Alternatif Restrukturisasi Utang Atau Penutupan Perusahaan Pada Pandemi Covid-19 Melalui PKPU, Kepailitan Dan Likuidasi. Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(1), 43-56.

Kheriah. (2013). Independensi Pengurus Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Dalam Hukum Kepailitan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 238-257.

Kinanti, A. P. & Suryono, A. (2022). Analisis Tanggung Jawab Kurator Secara Pribadi Dan Jabatan. Privat Law, 10(2), 169-178.

Nugroho, L. D. (2017). Peluang Digunakannya Lembaga Mediasi Untuk Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Debitor Pailit. Rechtidee, 12(2), 245-266.

Nurudin, A. (2014). Menyoal Tentang Honorarium Kurator/Pengurus Boedel Pailit Dalam Pelaksanaan Kepailitan. Jurnal Spektrum, 11(1), 1-10.

Sofia, A. N. (2020). Kedudukan Hak Suara Kreditor Preferen Dalam Persetujuan Rencana Perdamaian Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU). Jurist-Diction, 3(4), 1415-1430.

Winastri, R. K., Priyono, E. A., & Hendrawati, D. (2017). Tinjauan Normatif Terhadap Ganti Rugi Dalam Perkara Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Yang Menimbulkan Kerugian Immateriil (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Istimewa Jakarta No. 568/1968.G). Diponegoro Law Journal, 6(2), 1-18.

Laws and Regulations

Indonesian Civil Code.

Indonesian Criminal Code.

Law Number 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations.

Website

Dirgantara, A. (2021, Juli 16). Bareskrim Tangkap Kurator Pengurus PKPU di PN Jakpus. Retrieved September 12, 2021, from detikNews: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5646484/bareskrim-tangkap-kurator-pengurus-pkpu-di-pn-jakpus.

Hardum, S. E. (2021, Juli 16). Bareskrim Polri Jemput Paksa Kurator di Pengadilan Jakarta Pusat. Retrieved September 12, 2021, from Berita Satu: https://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/801595/bareskrim-polri-jemput-paksa-kurator-di-pengadilan-jakarta-pusat.

PT JSR dan PT AOS Duga Ada Penggelembungan Tagihan. (2021, Mei 20). Retrieved February 8, 2022, from Media Indonesia: https://mediaindonesia.com/ekonomi/406090/pt-jsr-dan-pt-aos-duga-ada-penggelembungan-tagihan.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v6i3.28581

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times


Copyright (c) 2023 Syiah Kuala Law Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License

Syiah Kuala Law Journal published by Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SKLJ.