CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE AS SYSTEM ACTUALIZATION PROOF OF CRIMINAL HARASSMENT IN SCOPE CORPORATION
Abstract
Based on the results of a survey by the Never Okay Project, 70.81% of respondents have been victims of violence and harassment in the world of work. This is because there is no specific regulation that becomes a legal umbrella in cases of harassment in the corporate sphere. The rigid evidence system in Indonesia is also the reason for the increase in casualties. Circumstantial Evidence as a criminal proof system in cases of harassment carried out within the corporate scope is urgent because the protection of victims of harassment can be improved by showing a relationship between facts or events related to harassment behavior. This research uses a juridical-normative approach method, which focuses on analyzing legal norms contained inside or outside laws and regulations. This study concludes that the protection of workers victims of harassment in the corporate sphere is still minimal, so it requires specific legal regulations governing the prevention, handling, and protection of victims. In addition, more rigid regulations are needed regarding the use of Circumstantial Evidence as evidence in cases of harassment within the corporate sphere, by formulating clear guidelines or provisions in the criminal procedure law.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul Halim B. (2013). Budaya Hukum Masyarakat Dalam Perspektif Sistem Hukum. Jurnal UKSW, http://eprints.unlam.ac.id/id/eprint/138
Al Hafis, R. I., & Yogia, M. A. (2017). Abuse of power: Tinjauan terhadap penyalahgunaan kekuasaan oleh pejabat publik di Indonesia. Publika: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 3(1), 80-88.
Amiruddin, M. C., & Syamsuddin, R. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Pertimbangan Tentang Keyakinan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Dengan Berdasarkan Circumstantial Evidence Atau Bukti Tidak Langsung (Studi Putusan No. 777/Pid. B/2016/Pn. Jkt. Pst Kasus Jessica Kumala Wongso). Alauddin Law Development Journal, 3(3), p.531-543.
Andre, Joy (2022, Juni 09). Kala Kasus Atasan Pukul Pegawai Pajak di Kota Bekasi Berujung Damai, tapi Sanksi Tetap Menanti. Retrieved June 20, 2023, From Megapolitan Kompas: https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2022/06/09/07104681/kala-kasus-atasan-pukul-pegawai-pajak-di-kota-bekasi-berujung-damai-tapi?page=all
Andriani, Vivitri. E. (2018, Oktober). Interpersonal Communication in Workplace Bullying. In International Conference on Media and Communication Studies (ICOMACS 2018) (pp. 58-60). Retrieved June 24, 2023, From Atlantis Press: https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icomacs-18/25900595
Ciby, M., & Raya, R. P. (2014). Exploring victims' experiences of workplace bullying: A grounded theory approach. Vikalpa, 39(2), p.69-82.
CNN Indonesia. (2023, Mei 09). Kronologi Bos Ajak Staycation Karyawati AD, Bermula dari Makan Siang. Retrieved June 20, 2023, From CNN Indonesia: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230509103846-20-947084/kronologi-bos-ajak-staycation-karyawati-ad-bermula-dari-makan-siang
CNN Indonesia. (2023, Mei 11). Fakta-Fakta Pembunuhan Mayat Dicor Semen di Semarang. Retrieved June 20, 2023, From CNN Indonesia: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230511082234-12-948085/fakta-fakta-pembunuhan-mayat-dicor-semen-di-semarang
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (1996). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Deutsch, R. M. (2013). Circumstantial Evidence in Workplace Harassment Cases: An Emerging Standard. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, 17(2), p.307-337.
Dixon, D., & Shepherd, R. (2018). Proof of workplace harassment and the probative value of Circumstantial Evidence: Lessons from Canadian labour arbitration. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 41(4), p. 1570-1606.
Evans, Colin. (2010). Criminal Justice: Evidence, New York: Chelsea House Publisher.
Fuady, Munir. (2012). Teori Hukum Pembuktian Pidana dan Perdata. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. p.5
Harahap, M. Yahya (2016). Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hastanto, Ikhwan (2021, September 02). Sebelum Kasus Pegawai KPI Viral, Polisi Kerap Remehkan Laporan Perundungan dan Pelecehan. Retrieved June 22, 2023 From Vice: https://www.vice.com/id/article/5dbend/kepolisian-indonesia-kerap-meremehkan-laporan-perundungan-dan-pelecehan-seperti-dialami-pegawai-kpi-yang-viral
Hiariej, Eddy. O.S. (2012). Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian, Jakarta: Erlangga p.54
Hidayanti, Lilik. (2016). Pembulian di Tempat Kerja dalam Konteks Asia, Research Report, p.133-142.
Huda, M. W. S., & Izza, R. L. (2022). Quo Vadis Perlindungan Kekerasan Seksual: Urgensi RUU PKS Sebagai Perlindungan Korban Kekerasan Seksual. Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, 2(2), p.172-187.
International Labour Organization: Convention No. 190 on Violence and Harassment (Geneva: ILO,2019. Retrieved June 10, 2023, From ILO.ORG: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C190
Kamarusdiana. (2018). Filsafat Hukum, Jakarta: UIN Jakarta Press.
Kasim, Umar. (2009). Ketentuan Harassment di Tempat Kerja, Info Hukum 2(11) p.34-48
Larry E. Sulivan & Marie S. Rosen. (2010). Encyclopedia of Law Enforcement, California: Sage Publications.
Martha, A.E. (2020). Advokasi Perempuan Korban Kekerasan Melalui Model Clinic Legal Education. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 27(3), 547–567.
Nugroho, B. (2017). Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Dalam Putusan Hakim Menurut KUHAP. Yuridika, 32(1), p. 17-36.
Palit, B.R. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap tindak kekerasan dan pelecehan seksual di dunia kerja berdasarkan konvensi ilo no. 190 tahun 2019. Lex administratum, 9(7). E-jurnal unsrat.
Pangestu, K., Suyanto, H., & Agustanti, R. D. (2021). Aplication of Circumstantial Evidence in Criminal Laws in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Novelty. 12(1), 54-66
Prayitno, N.A. (2021). Terjadi Sejak 2011, Ini Update Terbaru Kasus Pelecehan di KPI Pusat. Retrieved June 10, 2023, From Popbela: https://www.popbela.com/career/working-life/niken-ari/terjadi-sejak-2011-ini-update-terbaru-kasus-pelecehan-di-kpi-pusat?page=all
Press release Organisasi Perburuhan Internasional (ILO) dan Never Okay Project. Temuan Survei Pekerja tentang Kekerasan dan Pelecehan di Tempat Kerja, Rabu, 28 September, Hotel Le Meridien Jakarta. Retrieved June 10, 2023, From ILO.ORG: https://www.ilo.org/jakarta/lang--en/index.htm
Qosim, N. (2022). Fenomena tindak morahara dalam drama “harassment game” karya masaki nishiura dan munenori sekino. Doctoral dissertation, SekolahTinggi Bahasa Asing JIA #KODEPT043131
Sahan, Makbule. (2020). The First International Standard on Violence and Harassment in the World of Work, Bussines and Human Rights Journal Cambridge 5(2), 289-295.
Siregar, M. (2018). Bukti Tidak Langsung (Indirect Evidence) Dalam Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 13(2), p. 187-200.
Soekanto, S & Sri Mamudji. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Rajawali Perss.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v7i3.33157
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Copyright (c) 2023 Syiah Kuala Law Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Syiah Kuala Law Journal published by Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SKLJ.






