Impeachment of the Head of State in Indonesia: Threats to Presidentialism or Improving the Constitutional System
Abstract
One crucial element in a presidential-based system is the impeachment process for the president. Prior to the amendments, Indonesia lacked a clear mechanism for removing a president during their term. The removal was determined by a majority vote in the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR), which posed problems because this process was entirely political and did not involve legal aspects. After the amendments, the idea emerged that in a presidential system, a president cannot be removed solely through political means; a legal process must be followed first. Therefore, this article aims to explain the mechanism of presidential impeachment in Indonesia by comparing it with other countries. The method used in this study is normative juridical. Based on the analysis conducted, it is evident that presidential impeachment in Indonesia, in a normative sense, contradicts the principle of checks and balances, particularly because this process does not involve a second chamber.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anwar, C. (1999). Konstitusi dan kelembagaan negara. Jakarta: CV. Novindo Pustaka Mandiri.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2012). Pengantar ilmu hukum tata negara (Cet. 4). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Arry. (2016). Impeachment dalam sistem presidensial: Kajian teoretik dan normatif di Indonesia sebelum dan sesudah amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa, 3(1), 1-13.
Akgemci, E. (2022). Authoritarian populism as a response to crisis: The case of Brazil. Uluslararası İlişkiler / International Relations, 19(74), 37–51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27130875
Darmodiharjo, D. (1985). Santiaji Pancasila: Suatu tinjauan filosofis, historis dan yuridis. Jakarta: Kurnia Esa.
Doval, G. P., & Actis, E. (2016). The political and economic instability of Dilma Rousseff’s second government in Brazil: Between impeachment and the pragmatic turn. India Quarterly, 72(2), 120–131. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48505491
Faiz, P. M., & Redhani, E. (2018). Analisis perbandingan peran kamar kedua parlemen dan kekuasaan kehakiman dalam proses pemberhentian presiden. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(2), 231-256. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1521
Ginsburg, T., Huq, A., & Landau, D. (2021). The comparative constitutional law of presidential impeachment. The University of Chicago Law Review, 88(1), 81–164. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26966492
Hadi, S. (2016). Impeachment presiden dan/atau wakil presiden (studi perbandingan antara Indonesia, Amerika Serikat, dan Filipina). DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(23), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v12i23
Hinojosa, V. J., & Pérez-Liñán, A. S. (2006). Presidential survival and the impeachment process: The United States and Colombia. Political Science Quarterly, 121(4), 653–675. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20202766
Isenbergh, J. (1999). Impeachment and presidential immunity from judicial process. Yale Law & Policy Review, 18(1), 53–109. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40239516
Katyal, N. K. (2000). Impeachment as congressional constitutional interpretation. Law and Contemporary Problems, 63(1/2), 169–191. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1192447
Kopchak, K. (2022). Overview of bicameral legislatures potential impact on the executive selection process. Indiana Journal of Constitutional Design, 9, Article 2. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijcd/vol9/iss1/2/?utm_source=www.repository.law.indiana.edu%2Fijcd%2Fvol9%2Fiss1%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
Karakteristik Pemakzulan Presiden di Indonesia. (2022). Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(3), 552.
Krisna, I. G. N. B., Suryawan, G. B., & Arthanaya, W. (2020). Mekanisme impeachment presiden dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 1(2), 296-299.
Linan, A. P. (2007). Presidential impeachment and the new political instability in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2005). Mekanisme impeachment dan hukum acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi
Palmer, N. (1999). Legitimizing impeachment. Journal of American Studies, 33(2), 343–349. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27556649
Passaglia, P. (2018). Unicameralism, bicameralism, multicameralism: Evolution and trends in Europe. Perspective on Federalism, 10(2), 1-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/pof-2018-0014
Pérez-Liñán, A. (2014). A two-level theory of presidential instability. Latin American Politics and Society, 56(1), 34–54. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43286513
Rahman, Abdul (2017). Pemakzulan kepala negara: Telaah sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia dan ketatanegaraan Islam. Jurnal Syari’ah dan Hukum Diktum, 15(2), 127-150.
Rahman, Abdul. (2019). Impeachment: Perspektif ketatanegaraan Indonesia dan ketatanegaraan Islam. Al-Risalah, 19(1)
Satriya, Catur Alfath. (2022). Karakteristik Pemakzulan Presiden di Indonesia.Jurnal Konstitusi 19(3) https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1932
Syawawi, R. (2010). Pengaturan pemberhentian presiden dalam masa jabatan menurut UUD 1945 (studi komparatif sebelum dan sesudah perubahan). Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(6), 54-96. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk763
Toding, A. (2017). DPD dalam struktur parlemen Indonesia: Wacana pemusnahan versus penguatan. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(2), 296-314. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk142
Zulhidayat, M. (2019). Perbandingan konstitusional: Pengaturan impeachment di Indonesia dan Italia. Jurnal Hukum Replik, 7(1).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v8i3.41664
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Copyright (c) 2024 Syiah Kuala Law Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Syiah Kuala Law Journal published by Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SKLJ.