The Implications of Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 2 of 2023 on the Principle of Judicial Independence and Legal Certainty in Interfaith Marriages

Lina Kristie Yonathin, Ariawan Gunadi

Abstract


This study examines the implications of Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 2 of 2023 for legal certainty and judicial independence in cases involving the registration of inter‑faith marriages in Indonesia. The country’s rich diversity of ethnicities, cultures, and religions creates considerable complexity in regulating marriage—particularly where it appears to conflict with Article 2(1) of the Marriage Act, which requires conformity with the parties’ respective religious laws. That provision often obstructs legal recognition of inter‑faith marriages, even though Article 28B(1) of the 1945 Constitution guarantees the freedom to form a family. Supreme Court Circular Letter No. 2 of 2023 seeks to standardise judicial practice by prohibiting the registration of such marriages, yet it generates tension with human‑rights principles and the Population Administration Act, which leaves room for registration via a court ruling. Employing a normative juridical approach, this research explores the disharmony among these regulations and their impact on legal certainty. The findings indicate that the Circular Letter provides administrative clarity but simultaneously restricts judicial independence, as reflected in disciplinary action against judges in Court Order No. 423/Pdt.P/2023/PN Jkt.Utr. The tension between legal certainty and judicial independence highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing religious norms, individual freedoms, and social cohesion within a plural society. The study recommends more inclusive regulatory frameworks that accommodate social dynamics without compromising the rule‑of‑law principle.

Keywords


Inter‑Faith Marriage; Supreme Court Circular Letter; Judicial Independence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, Y. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum. Sinar Grafika.

Ali, Z. (2006). Sosiologi Hukum. Sinar Grafika.

Amri, A. (2020). Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam. Media Syari’ah : Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial, 22(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v22i1.6719

Ashshiddiqi, M. H., Pratama, M. Z. S., Rahminingsih, S. E., Frengki, M., & Anggriawan, T. P. (2023). Dinamika Keabsahan Perkawinan beda Agama dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata di Indonesia. Proceeding of Conference on Law and Social Studies.

Aulia, M. F. (2022). ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN PENERAPAN HUKUM KELUARGA DI MESIR DAN DI INDONESIA. Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam, 2(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v2i2.14327

Dahwal, S. (2016). Hukum Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Teori dan Praktiknya di Indonesia. Mandar Maju.

Denaya, S., & Dewi, M. P. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Sema Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 Tentang Petunjuk Bagi Hakim Dalam Mengadili Perkara Permohonan Pencatatan Perkawinan Antar-Umat yang Berbeda Agama dan Kepercayaan. Viva Justicia: Journal of Private Law, 1(1), 222–248.

Elnizar, N. E. (2023). Nasib Kawin Beda Agama dan Terbitnya SEMA No.2 Tahun 2023. Hukumonline.com. https://www.hukumonline.com/stories/article/lt64cb75d5cbc5c/nasib-kawin-beda-agama-dan-terbitnya-sema-no2-tahun-2023/

Gonadi, A. V. C., & Djajaputra, G. (2023). Analisis Perspektif Pro Kontra Masyarakat Terhadap Penerapan Sema No. 2 Tahun 2023. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 2974–2988. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1072

Halilah, S., & Arif, M. F. (2021). ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM MENURUT PARA AHLI. Siyasah : Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 4(2), 56–65.

Hermanto, Y. R. (2024). Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Positif, Hukum Islam dan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia. Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization, 12(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/jolsic.v12i1.85113

Irfani, N. (2020). ASAS LEX SUPERIOR, LEX SPECIALIS, DAN LEX PESTERIOR: PEMAKNAAN, PROBLEMATIKA, DAN PENGGUNAANNYA DALAM PENALARAN DAN ARGUMENTASI HUKUM. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(3), 305. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i3.711

Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi (19 ed.). Prenada Media Group.

Matheus, J., & Gunadi, A. (2024). Pembentukan Lembaga Pengawas Perlindungan Data Pribadi Di Era Ekonomi Digital: Kajian Perbandingan Dengan KPPU. JUSTISI, 10(1), 20–35.

Munawaroh, N. (2023). Kekuatan Hukum Produk Hukum MA: PERMA SEMA, Fatwa, dan SK KMA. Hukumonline.com. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/kekuatan-hukum-produk-hukum-ma--perma-sema--fatwa--dan-sk-kma-cl6102/

Radbruch, G. (2022). Legal Philosphy (S. W. Kim (ed.)). Sam Young Sa.

Ridwan. (2014). Direksi & Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah. UII Press.

Rusli, & Tama, R. (1986). Perkawinan Antar Agama Dan Permasalahannya: Sebagai Pelengkap UU Perkawinan No. 1 Tahun 1974. Pionir Jaya.

Suhartono, S. (2019). Hukum Positif Problematik Penerapan dan Solusi Teoritiknya. DIH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(2), 201–211.

Sunggono, B. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Yamin, M. (1952). Proklamasi dan Konstitusi. Djambatan.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v9i2.48033

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 61 times
PDF - 47 times

Copyright (c) 2025 Syiah Kuala Law Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License

Syiah Kuala Law Journal published by Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SKLJ.