Exploring Indonesian EFL teacher-student interactions in online learning
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alghasab, M., & Handley, Z. (2017). Capturing (non-)collaboration in wiki-mediated collaborative writing activities: The need to examine discussion posts and editing acts in tandem. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 664–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1341928
Alghasab, M., Hardman, J., & Handley, Z. (2019). Teacher-student interaction on wikis: Fostering collaborative learning and writing. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.12.002
Andujar, A. (2016). Benefits of mobile instant messaging to develop ESL writing. System, 62, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.07.004
Attali, Y. (2011). Immediate feedback and opportunity to revise answers: Application of a graded response IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(6), 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621610381755
Batlle, J., & Deal, M. (2021). Teacher epistemic stance as a trouble in foreign language classroom interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 176, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.023
Blaine, A. M. (2019). Interaction and presence in the virtual classroom: An analysis of the perceptions of students and teachers in online and blended advanced placement courses. Computers and Education, 132, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.004
Branigan, H. E., & Donaldson, D. I. (2020). Teachers matter for metacognition: Facilitating metacognition in the primary school through teacher-pupil interactions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, Article 100718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100718
Cole, M. T., Shelley, D. J., & Swartz, L. B. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1748
Daud, A. (2019). Teaching writing using Google Apps for Education (GAFE). Indonesian Journal of Economics, Social, and Humanities, 1(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.31258/ijesh.1.1.2
Graham, K. (2016). Extending the language classroom with Edmodo. Modern English Teacher, 25(2), 41–43.
Guo, W., Lau, K. L., & Wei, J. (2019). Teacher feedback and students’ self-regulated learning in mathematics: A comparison between a high-achieving and a low-achieving secondary schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.07.001
Gutentag, T., Orner, A., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2022). Classroom discussion practices in online remote secondary school settings during COVID-19. Computers in Human Behavior, 132, Article 107250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107250
Haoucha, M. (2012). The role of peer feedback, teacher written and taped. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 5(5), 73–108.
Hofmann, R., & Mercer, N. (2016). Teacher interventions in small group work in secondary mathematics and science lessons. Language and Education, 30(5), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1125363
Hu, B. Y., Wang, S., Song, Y., & LoCasale-Crouch, J. (2020). Exploring the complex relationship between developmentally appropriate activities and teacher-child interaction quality in rural Chinese preschools. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, Article 105112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105112
Ivone, F. M., Jacobs, G. M., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Far apart, yet close together: Cooperative learning in online education. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17285
Jones, R. H., Garralda, A., Li, D. C. S., & Lock, G. (2006). Interactional dynamics in online and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.12.001
Kasula, A. (2016). Is Google Classroom ready for ELL? The Word, 24(2), 11–12.
Kellogg, S., Booth, S., & Oliver, K. (2014). A social network perspective on peer supported learning in MOOCs for educators. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 263–289. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1852
Major, L., Warwick, P., Rasmussen, I., Ludvigsen, S., & Cook, V. (2018). Classroom dialogue and digital technologies: A scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 1995–2028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9701-y
Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3482
Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. Journal of the Learning Science, 17(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701793182
Michinov, N., & Michinov, E. (2008). Face-to-face contact at the midpoint of an online collaboration: Its impact on the patterns of participation, interaction, affect, and behavior over time. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1540–1557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.03.002
Ohlsson, R. (2018). Student-teacher conferencing in Swedish upper secondary school: Dimensions of dominance and relations between perspectives in institutional discourse. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 18, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.03.010
Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374
Pritchard, R. J., & Morrow, D. (2017). Comparison of online and face-to-face peer review of writing. Computers and Composition, 46, 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2017.09.006
Purnawarman, P., Susilawati, S., & Sundayana, W. (2016). The use of Edmodo in teaching writing in a blended learning setting. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i2.1348
Raes, A., Vanneste, P., Pieters, M., Windey, I., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Depaepe, F. (2020). Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Computers and Education, 143, Article 103682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103682
Sa’adah, L., Nurkamto, J., & Suparno, S. (2018). Oral corrective feedback: Exploring the relationship between teacher’s strategy and students’ willingness to communicate. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(2), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v5i2.11532
Saclarides, E. S., & Munson, J. (2021). Exploring the foci and depth of coach-teacher interactions during modeled lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, Article 103418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103418
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x
Sortkær, B. (2019). Feedback for everybody? Exploring the relationship between students’ perceptions of feedback and students’ socioeconomic status. British Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 717–735. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3522
Suh, S., & Michener, C. J. (2019). The preparation of linguistically responsive teachers through dialogic online discussion prompts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.015
Sulistyo, T., Eltris, K. P. N., Mafulah, S., Budianto, S., Saiful, S., & Heriyawati, D. F. (2020). Portfolio assessment: Learning outcomes and students’ attitudes. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15169
Sweet, T. M. (2016). Social network methods for the educational and psychological sciences. Educational Psychologist, 51(3–4), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1208093
Sybing, R. (2021). Examining dialogic opportunities in teacher-student interaction: An ethnographic observation of the language classroom. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, Article 100492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100492
Tang, H. (2021). Teaching teachers to use technology through massive open online course: Perspectives of interaction equivalency. Computers and Education, 174, Article 104307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104307
Van Gasse, R., Vanlommel, K., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2020). Teacher interactions in taking action upon pupil learning outcome data: A matter of attitude and self-efficacy? Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, Article 102989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102989
Xing, W., Tang, H., & Pei, B. (2019). Beyond positive and negative emotions: Looking into the role of achievement emotions in discussion forums of MOOCs. Internet and Higher Education, 43, Article 100690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100690
Zacharias, N. T. (2007). Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback. RELC Journal, 38(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206076157
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.23804
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.