Unlocking potential: Integrating pronunciation into business instruction to inspire students and strengthen content teachers

Budsaba Kanoksilpatham, Chongrug Pariwatnanont

Abstract


Integrating content and language instruction has gained popularity worldwide because it allows students to improve their content knowledge while concurrently honing their language skills. Although this approach seems beneficial in principle, it can be quite demanding, particularly on the content teachers’ part in practice. This study aims to examine the effect of language instruction integrated into a content class at a university in Thailand. Based on a content teacher’s voluntary participation, a class of business students (N = 52) were exposed to 5-8 minutes of English word stress instruction in eight business lessons spanning over the entire course. A similar 40 business words for the pretest and post-test were administered at the beginning and toward the end of the course. Subsequently, a focus group discussion of six students was conducted to elicit the students’ attitudes toward such integrated instruction. The analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data shows that integrating pronunciation instruction with content instruction can be beneficial. Cognitively, the students’ word stress placement skills have substantially improved, as determined by a high value of the t-test. Psychologically, the students had positive attitudes, greater motivation to learn English, higher engagement in the lessons, and more confidence in speaking English. Overall, the study demonstrates that pronunciation instruction minimally integrated with content instruction could lead to immense pronunciation success. The study has important implications for English language educators who seek to effectively integrate pronunciation instruction into their content instruction programs, benefiting both students and content teachers.

Keywords


business words; intelligibility; language and content integrated instruction; pronunciation; word stress

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anamaria-Mirabela, P., & Monica-Ariana, S. (2014). Business English outside the box. Business jargon and abbreviations in business communication. Annals of Faculty of Economics, 1(2), 111-119.

Boonraksa, T., & Naisena, S. (2022). A study on English collocation errors of Thai EFL students. English Language Teaching, 15(1), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n1p164

Chaisuriya, A., & Sun-Young, S. (2019). Examining English test practicality among different stakeholders in Thailand. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(1), 107-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.1.7.107

Darcy, I. (2018). Powerful and effective pronunciation instruction: How can we achieve it? Catesol Journal, 30(1), 13-45.

Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins.

Education First. (2023). EF EPI English Proficiency Index. https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi/regions/asia/thailand/

Fernández-Sanjurjo, J., Fernández-Costales, A., & Arias Blanco, J. M. (2019). Analysing students’ content-learning in science in CLIL vs. non-CLIL programmes: Empirical evidence from Spain. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(6), 661-674. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1294142

Galante, A., & Piccardo, E. (2022). Teaching pronunciation: Toward intelligibility and comprehensibility. ELT Journal, 76(3), 375-386. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab060

Gálvez Gómez, M. D. M. (2021). The effects of CLIL on FL learning: A longitudinal study. In M. L. Pérez Cañado (Ed.), Content and language integrated learning in monolingual settings: New insights from the Spanish context (pp. 141-165). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68329-0_8

Garcia, C., Kolat, M., & Morgan, T. (2018). Self-correction of second language pronunciation via online, real-time, visual feedback. In J. Levis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 54-65). Iowa State University.

Ghosh, M., & Levis, J. M. (2021). Vowel quality and direction of stress shift in a predictive model explaining the varying impact of misplaced word stress: Evidence from English. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 628780. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.628780

Golombek, P., & Jordan, S. R. (2005). Becoming “black lambs” not “parrots”: A poststructuralist orientation to intelligibility and identity. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 513-533. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588492

Griva, E., & Kasvikis, K. (2014). CLIL in primary education: Possibilities and challenges for developing L2/FL skills, history understanding and cultural awareness. In Ν. Bakić-Mirić & D. Erkinovich Gaipov (Eds.), Current trends and issues in education: An international dialogue. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Hahn, L. D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 201-223. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588378

Huensch, A. (2019). Pronunciation in foreign language classrooms: Instructors’ training, classroom practices, and beliefs. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 745-764. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818767182

Inceoglu, S. (2021). Exploring the relationship between explicit instruction, pronunciation awareness, and the development of L2 French connected speech processes. Language Awareness, 30(4), 336-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1881527

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2014). Thai elementary school teachers’ English pronunciation and effects of teacher variables: Professional development. TESL-EJ, 18(1), 1-13.

Kanoksilapatham, B., & Khamkhien, A. (2022). CLIL implemented and scaffolded in an EFL higher education context: Engineering research methodology course, Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 502-514. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.36913

Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2017). Pronunciation acquisition. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 260-279). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-15

Lacabex, E. G., & Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. (2020). Explicit phonetic instruction vs. implicit attention to native exposure: Phonological awareness of English schwa in CLIL. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 58(4), 419-442. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0079

Lasagabaster, D., & Doiz, A. (2016). CLIL students’ perceptions of their language learning process: Delving into self-perceived improvement and instructional preferences. Language Awareness, 25(1-2), 110-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1122019

Levis, J. M. (2018). Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge University Press.

McGregor, A., & Reed, M. (2018). Integrating pronunciation into the English language curriculum: A framework for teachers. CATESOL Journal, 30(1), 69-94.

Pennington, M. C. (2021). Teaching pronunciation: The state of the art 2021. RELC Journal, 52(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211002283

Pommée, T., Balaguer, M., Mauclair, J., Pinquier, J., & Woisard, V. (2022). Intelligibility and comprehensibility: A Delphi consensus study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 57(1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12672

Rahbar, S., Ahangari, S., & Saeidi, M. (2020). Raising the learners’ awareness of prosodic features in pronunciation and its impact on listening comprehension: Insights from noticing hypothesis (Schmidt, 1995). Journal of Foreign Language Research, 10(2), 260-271. https://doi.org/10.22059/JFLR.2020.287970.674

Saengboon, S. (2019). Shadow education in Thailand: A case study of Thai English tutors’ perspectives towards the roles of private supplementary tutoring in improving English language skills. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 12(1), 38-54.

Saito, K. (2021). What characterizes comprehensible and native‐like pronunciation among English‐as‐a‐second‐language speakers? Meta‐analyses of phonological, rater, and instructional factors. TESOL Quarterly, 55(3), 866-900. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3027

Sato, T., & Hemmi, C. (2022). Development of second language productive skills through CLIL in a Japanese university: A pre-experimental longitudinal study. Language Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2022-2040

Savski, K. (2023). Negotiating hegemonies in language policy: Ideological synergies in media recontextualizations of audit culture. Current Issues in Language Planning, 24(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.2006945

Tantiwich, K., & Sinwongsuwat, K. (2021). Thai University students’ problems of language use in English conversation. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 598-626.

Walker, R., Low, E. L., & Setter, J. (2021). English pronunciation for a global world. Oxford University Press.

Wongsa, M., & Son, J. B. (2022). Enhancing Thai secondary school students’ English speaking skills, attitudes and motivation with drama-based activities and Facebook. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1853134

Yaniafari, R. P., & Rihardini, A. A. (2021). Face-to-face or online speaking practice: A comparison of students’ foreign language classroom anxiety level. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 8(1), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v8i1.3058

Yenkimaleki, M., & van Heuven, V. J. (2021). Effects of attention to segmental vs. suprasegmental features on the speech intelligibility and comprehensibility of the EFL learners targeting the perception or production-focused practice. System, 100, 102557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102557




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i2.34767

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats