Comparative analysis of interactional metadiscursive resources in academic writing by L2 and L1 English writers
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdollahzadeh, E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 288-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.019
Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Series: Studies in corpus linguistics (Vol. 24). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.24
Al-Mudhaffari, M., & Hussin, S. (2020). Interactional metadiscourse strategies in academic discourse: An analysis of research articles produced by Arab writers. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 28(1), 35-52.
Al-Zubeiry, H. Y. A. (2023). Stance-marking of interaction in research articles written by non-native speakers of English: An analytical study. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.26648
Ashofteh, Z., Shirvan, M. E., & Golparvar, S. E. (2020). The move structure of abstracts in applied linguistics research articles in light of the distribution and functions of metadiscourse markers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 2077-2096. https://doi.org/10.17263/JLLS.851035
Aull, L. L., & Lancaster, Z. (2014). Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus-based comparison. Written Communication, 31(2), 151-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314527055
Azar, A. S., Hassaram, P., Farook, F. I. M., & Romli, N. H. (2022). A comparative analysis of stance features in research article introductions: Malaysian and English authors. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 22(2), 261-287. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2022-2202-14
Bajwa, N. u. H., Langer, M., König, C. J., & Honecker, H. (2019). What might get published in management and applied psychology? Experimentally manipulating implicit expectations of reviewers regarding hedges. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1351-1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03164-2
Bal-Gezegin, B., & Baş, M. (2020). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A comparison of research articles and book reviews. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.710204
Can, T., & Cangır, H. (2019). A corpus-assisted comparative analysis of self-mention markers in doctoral dissertations of literary studies written in Turkey and the UK. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 42, 100796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100796
Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Connor, U. (2004). Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(4), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. S. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002
Deng, L., Fatemeh, B., & Gao, X. (2021). Exploring the interactive and interactional metadiscourse in doctoral dissertation writing: A diachronic study. Scientometrics, 126(8), 7223-7250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04064-0
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2021). Engaging with the reader in research articles in English: Variation across disciplines and linguacultural backgrounds. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.02.003
Ghahraman, V., Karlsson, M., Kazemi, A., Saeedi, S., & Elhami, A. (2023). On the functions of hedging in research articles (RAs): A study on RA discussions. International Journal of Language Studies, 17(January), 165-187. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7513381
Hinkel, E. (2005). Hedging, inflating, and persuading in L2 academic writing. Applied Language Learning, 15(1), 29-53.
Ho, V., & Li, C. (2018). The use of metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first-year university students’ timed argumentative essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.001
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K. (2019). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Lee, J. J., & Casal, J. E. (2014). Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: Across-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering. System, 46(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.009
Lee, J. J., & Deakin, L. (2016). Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.004
Li, T., & Wharton, S. (2012). Metadiscourse repertoire of L1 Mandarin undergraduates writing in English: A cross-contextual, cross-disciplinary study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(4), 345-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.07.004
Loi, C. K., & Lim, J. M. H. (2019). Hedging in the discussion sections of English and Malay educational research articles. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 19(1), 36-61. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1901-03
Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural differences in academic rhetoric: A textlinguistic study. Peter Lang.
Mu, C., Zhang, L. J., Ehrich, J., & Hong, H. (2015). The use of metadiscourse for knowledge construction in Chinese and English research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20(2015), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003
Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1
Swales, J. (1985). English language papers and authors’ first language: Preliminary explorations. Scientometrics, 8(1-2), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02025223
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, G. (2008). Ken Hyland, Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Language in Society, 37(1), 138-141. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404508080111
Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36(1), 82-93. https://doi.org/10.2307/357609
Wingate, U. (2012). ‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001
Zhang, M. (2019). Exploring personal metadiscourse markers across speech and writing using cluster analysis. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 26(4), 267-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2018.1480856
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i2.35456
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.