Blended learning challenges of EFL undergraduate students: Student learning experience in an AI-integrated ESP course

Pimsiri Taylor

Abstract


Blended learning can facilitate ESP learning, yet challenges in AI-integrated ESP learning are largely unexplored. This study aims to investigate the blended learning challenges of EFL undergraduate students from the perspective of student learning experience in an AI-integrated ESP course. The participants were 57 Thai mixed-level undergraduate students studying English for economics at a public university in Thailand. Using a mixed-method approach, student data were collected and analysed using Microsoft Teams learning analytics and triangulated with a questionnaire and focus group interview data. Study results showed similarities and differences in students’ blended learning challenges in the diverse target participants. Participants generally viewed technological and online learning aspects as the least challenging, in contrast with social aspects as the most challenging, followed by motivation and willingness to participate in the blended learning ESP course. Despite students’ academic achievement, data revealed students’ negative emotions and negative blended learning experiences amongst higher-proficiency students, but lower level of blended learning challenges due to easy learning tasks and lack of teacher support for more advanced language skills. In contrast, lower-proficiency students recorded more positive emotions and blended learning experiences but a higher level of blended learning challenges. Despite lower-level English, lower-proficiency students experienced teacher support both in using AI and ESP. The study highlights the importance of teacher support, which fulfils the incomplete roles of AI in ESP blended learning, and calls for a reconceptualisation of blended learning challenges. Implications for pedagogy and research on AI-integrated blended learning in ESP contexts are provided.


Keywords


artificial intelligence; blended learning; ESP; learning challenges; learning experience

Full Text:

PDF

References


Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2008). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to action research across the professions. Routledge.

Awidi, I.S., & Paynter, M. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers & Education, 128, 269-283, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013

Bouilheres, F., Le, L.T.V.H., McDonald, S., Nkhoma, C., & Jandug-Montera, L. (2020). Defining student learning experience through blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 3049–3069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10100-y

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004

Duong, T. L. N. & Nguyen, N. H. U (2021). The challenges of e-learning through Microsoft Teams for EFL students at Van Lang University in Covid-19. Asia CALL Online Journal, 12(4), 18-29. https://asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/60

Ertl, H., & Wright, S. (2008). Reviewing the literature on the student learning experience in higher education. London Review of Education, 6(3), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460802489348

Fadde, P. J., & Vu, P. (2014). Blended online learning: Misconceptions, benefits, and challenges. In P. Lowenthal, C. S. York & J. C. Richardson (Eds.), Online learning: Common misconceptions, benefits, and challenges (pp. 33-48). Nova.

Gaffas, Z. M. (2023). Students’ perceptions of e-learning ESP course in virtual and blended learning modes. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 10329–10358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11579-x

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.

Hockly, N. (2018). Blended learning, ELT Journal, 72(1), 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx058

Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023). Trends, research issues and applications of artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 112-131.

Ji, H., Han, I., & Ko, Y. (2022). A systematic review of conversational AI in language education: Focusing on the collaboration with human teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(1), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2142873

Jiang, R. (2022). How does artificial intelligence empower EFL teaching and learning nowadays? A review on artificial intelligence in the EFL context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1049401

Kerrs, M., & De Witt, C. (2010). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangement. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358165032000165653

Kovačić, A., & Bubaš, G. (2023). Using conversational artificial intelligence for online learning activities in English for specific purposes: A pilot study of students’ experiences with Bing Chat. 16th International Conference “Innovation in Language 36 Learning”: Hybrid Edition, Conference Proceedings (pp. 16-20). Filodiritto Publisher.

Margaryan, T., & Alyavdina, N. (2019). New trends in teaching English at a Russian technical university. In E. V. Smirnova & R.P. Clark (Eds.), Handbook of research on engineering education in a global context (pp. 274-284). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3395-5

Menggo, S., Darong, H.C. (2022). Blended learning in ESL/EFL class. LTT: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 25(1), 132-148. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i1.4159

Mulyadi, D., Hersulastuti, & Purnama, Y. (2019). Students’ perceptions of blended learning in mastering English for specific purposes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1339(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1339/1/012116

Ningsih, F. (2023). Classtime.com as an AI-based testing platform: Analysing ESP students’ performances and feedback, JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(3), 390-404. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i3.8286

Noirid, S., & Srisa-ard, B. (2007). E-learning models: A review of literature. 1st international Conference on Educational Reform 2007. Mahasarakam University

Paltridge, B., & Starfield. S. (2013). The handbook of English for specific purposes. Wiley-Blackwell.

Perveen, A. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous e-language learning: A case study of virtual university of Pakistan. Open Praxis, 8(1), 21-39.

Pivneva, S., Chernova, O., Abalyan, Z., Shangaraeva, L., Rubannikova, I., & Litvinov, A. (2023). Raising the level of motivation of economics students for studying English using the Myenglishlab Blended Learning Platform. Revista Conrado, 19(90), 270-276.

Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011

Qasem, F., Ghaleb, M., Mahdi, H.S., Al Khateeb, A., & Al Fadda, H. (2023). Dialog chatbot as an interactive online tool in enhancing ESP vocabulary learning. Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 3(2), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-10-2022-0072

Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A. & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701.

Sobaih, A.E.E., Salem, A.E., Hasanein, A.M., Elnasr, A.E.A. (2021). Responses to COVID19 in higher education: Students’ learning experience using Microsoft Teams versus social network sites. Sustainability,13(18), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810036

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute.http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf

Stanišić, N., Gajić, T., Đerić, I., Rončević, M. (2022). Blended learning approach to teaching ESP at tertiary level. Paper presented at Sinteza 2022 - International Scientific Conference on Information Technology and Data Related Research, 302-308. https://doi.org/10.15308/Sinteza-2022-302-308

Tiang-uan, A., & Taylor, P. (2021). Challenges in online English language learning: a study of an English medium instruction school in Thailand [MA dissertation, Thammasat University].

Taylor, P., Argasvipart, K., Kanokpermpoon, M., Rattanawisadrat, N., Dyamond, B. J., & Hrylytskyy, A. (2023). Stakeholders’ perceptions related to technology acceptance of Reading Progress in Microsoft Teams: A case study of a trilingual program at a secondary school in Thailand. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(2), 718–736.

Zerihun, Z., Beishuizen, J. & Van Os, W. (2012). Student learning experience as indicator of teaching quality. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 24, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9140-4

Zhang, R. (2021). Blended course evaluation in the context of English for specific purposes: Accountability and development. SAGE Open, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054502




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i3.37472

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats