Lexical bundles in accepted and rejected Scopus-indexed hard science research article introductions

Eri Kurniawan, Cicih Permatasari, Cicih Permatasari

Abstract


Lexical bundles are essential components of academic discourse, contributing to linguistic fluency in written and spoken communication. Their role is particularly crucial in publishing research articles in high-impact international journals. While previous studies have explored lexical bundle usage across various sections of research articles, little research has compared their use in accepted versus rejected introductions. This study aims to address this gap by examining the similarities and differences in lexical bundle usage within the introductions of accepted and rejected hard science research articles written by Indonesian scholars. This study employs a mixed-methods comparative research design. It analyzes 30 research article introductions from a hard science Scopus-indexed journal based on Bibers structural (noun/prepositional phrase-based) and Hylands functional (research-oriented, text-oriented, participant-oriented) frameworks. The findings indicate that accepted introductions contain a higher frequency of four-word lexical bundles. Structurally, both datasets are dominated by noun/prepositional phrase bundles and research-oriented bundles, but accepted introductions feature more structurally complete units. Functionally, research-oriented bundles are the most prevalent in both groups, emphasizing research processes and results in hard science writing. However, distinct differences in structural and functional subcategories suggest that proficiency in formulaic expressions may influence manuscript acceptance. This study contributes to understanding lexical bundle use in academic writing and provides practical implications for writing pedagogy, particularly for non-native scholars seeking publication in international journals.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., Zhao, L. (2013). Turning good research into good publications. Nankai Business Review International, 4, 92-106. https://doi.org/10.1108/20408741311323317

Anthony, L. (2020). AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software

Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (2016). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Routledge.

Berūkštienė, D. (2018). A corpus-driven analysis of structural types of lexical bundles in court judgments in English and their translation into Lithuanian. Kalbotyra, 70(70), 7.

https://doi.org/10.15388/klbt.2017.11181

Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., & Quirk, R. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman London.

Budiwiyanto, A., & Suhardijanto, T. (2020). Indonesian lexical bundles in research articles: Frequency, structure, and function. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10, 292-303.

https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i2.28592

Byrd, P., & Coxhead, A. (2010). On the other hand: Lexical bundles in academic writing and in the teaching of EAP. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 5(5), 31-64.

Çandarlı, D. (2012). A cross-cultural investigation of English and Turkish research article abstracts in educational sciences. Studies about language, 2, 12-17.

https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.0.20.1770

Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397–423.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001

Cortes, V. (2006). Teaching lexical bundles in the disciplines: An example from a writing intensive history class. Linguistics and education, 17(4), 391-406.

Coxhead, A. (2004). Using a class vocabulary box: How, why, when, where, and who. RELC Guidelines, 26(2): 19–23.

Coxhead, A., & Byrd, P. (2007). Preparing writing teachers to teach the vocabulary and grammar of academic prose. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 129–147.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.002

Čolović-Marković, J. (2012). The effects of explicit instruction of formulaic sequences on second-language writers [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Utah.

Demirel, E. T., & Ahmadi, S. (2013). Lexical bundles in research article acknowledgments: A corpus comparison. Hecettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 28, 457-468.

Gilquin, G., Granger, S., & Paquot, M. (2007). Learner corpora: The missing link in EAP pedagogy. English for Academic Purposes, 6, 319-335.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.007

Gouverneur, C. (2008). The phraseological patterns of high frequency verbs in advanced English for general purposes: A corpus-driven approach to EFL textbook analysis. In F. Meunier & S. Granger (Eds.), Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching (pp.223-243). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. The University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001

Hyland, K. (2012). Bundles in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 150-169.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000037

Hyland, K., & Jiang, K. (2016a). Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33(3), 251-274.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316650399

Hyland, K., & Jiang, K. (2018). Academic lexical bundles: How are they changing?. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23, 383-407. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17080.hyl.

Huang, J. C. (2014). Learning to write for publication in English through genre-based pedagogy: A case in Taiwan. System, 45(1), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.05.010

Kennedy, G. (2008). Phraseology and language pedagogy: Semantic preference associated with English verbs in the British National Corpus. In F. Meunier & S. Granger (Eds.), Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching (pp.21-31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Jalali, Z. S., & Moini, M. (2018). A corpus-based study of lexical bundles in discussion section of medical research articles. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 10(1), 95–124.

https://doi.org/10.22111/IJALS.2018.4265

Jalali, Z. S., & Moini, M. R. (2014). Structure of lexical bundles in introduction section of medical research articles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 719–726.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.473

Jalali, Z. S., Moini, M. R., & Arani, M. A. (2015). Structural and functional analysis of lexical bundles in medical research articles: A corpus-based study. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 13(1), 51–69.

Jalilifar, A., & Ghoreishi, S. M. (2018). From the perspective of functional analysis of lexical bundles in applied linguistics‎ research articles‎. International Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 161–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2018/2/310351

Jones, M., & Haywood, S. (2004). Facilitating the acquisition of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 269–292). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Kachru, Y. (2008). Language variation and corpus linguistics. World Englishes, 27, 1-8.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2008.00532.x.

Kurniawan, E., Dallyono, R., & Cahyowati, A. (2019). Exploring logical connectors in journals with different indexing levels: A comparison between international and national indexed journals. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9, 76-84.

https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i1.16088

Kurniawan, E., & Lubis, A. H. (2020). A comparative move analysis on the qualitative and quantitative findings and discussion sections written by EFL undergraduate students. Asian ESP Journal, 16(6.1), 137-162.

Lee, J. S., Saberi, d., Lam, M., & Webster, J. J. (2018). Assisted nominalization for academic English writing. In Alonso J. M., Catala A., & M. Theune (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop of Intelligent Interactive Systems and Language Generation (2IS&NLG) (pp. 26-30). Association for Computations Linguistics.

Li, J. & Schmitt, N. (2009). The acquisition of lexical phrases in academic writing: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 85-102.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.001

Metoyer-Duran, C. (1993). The readability of published, accepted, and rejected papers appearing in College & Research Libraries. College & Research Libraries, 54(6), 517–526.

https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_54_06_517

Meunir, F., & Granger, S. (2007). Phraseology in foreign language

learning and teaching. John Benjamins Publishing.

Nagano, R. L. (2015). Research article titles and disciplinary conventions: A corpus study of eight disciplines. Journal of Academic Writing, 5(1), 133–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v5i1.168

Nasrabady, P., Elahi Shirvan, M., & Ehsan Golparvar, S. (2020). Exploring lexical bundles in recent published papers in the field of applied linguistics. Journal of World Languages, 6(3), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2020.1797992

Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.

Nation, P. (2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. Cengage Learning.

Nation, P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. Routledge.

Pang, W. (2010). Lexical bundles and the construction of an academic voice: A pedagogical perspective. Asian EFL Journal, 47(1), 10-11.

Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479-497.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7

Pearson, W. (2021). A comparative study of lexical bundles in IELTS writing task 1 and 2 simulation essays and tertiary academic writing. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 15(1), 27–52.

Rajagopalan, J. (2015, May 20). Journal indexing 101: Understanding the basics. Retrieved from https://www.editage.com/insights/journal-indexing-101-understanding-the-basics

Rashtchi, M., & Mohammadi, M. A. (2017). Teaching lexical bundles to improve academic writing via tasks: Does the type of input matter? Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 14(2), 201-219.

Safnil. (2007). The dialogue technique of teaching writing research article introduction (RAI) in English. Forum Pendidikan, 26(2), 127-133.

Salazar, D. (2014). Lexical bundles in native and non-native scientific writing: Applying a corpus-based study to language teaching. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Savelyeva, E. N. (2021). Structural and functional analysis of lexical bundles in music research articles: A corpus-based approach [Unpublished thesis]. Dalarna University.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Shahriari, H., Ghonsooly, B., & Fatemi, A. H. (2013). An analysis of lexical bundles in research article abstracts by Iranian and native English-speaking authors of applied linguistics articles. The Asian ESP Journal, 9(1), 5–25.

Shahriari, H. (2017). Comparing lexical bundles across the introduction, method and results sections of the research article. Corpora, 12(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2017.0107

Shirazizadeh, M., & Amirfazlian, R. (2021). Lexical bundles in theses, articles and textbooks of applied linguistics: Investigating intradisciplinary uniformity and variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100946

Schmitt, N., & Carter, R. (2004). Formulaic sequences in action: An introduction. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), formulaic and sequences: Acquisition, processing use (pp. 1-22). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Suherdi, D., Kurniawan, E., & Lubis, A. H. (2020). A genre analysis of research article ‘findings and discussion’ sections written by Indonesian undergraduate EFL students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i1.24989

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Taieb, A. B., & Toumi, N. (2021). Exploring conventionalized phraseology in advanced academic writing of Tunisian linguistics students: A lexical bundles analysis. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 1-30.

Ucar, S. (2017). A corpus-based study on the use of three-word lexical bundles in the academic writing by native English and Turkish non-native writers. English Language Teaching, 10(12), 28.

https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n12p28

Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge

University Press.

Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford University Press.

Wray, A., & Fitzpatrick, T. (2008). Why can't you just leave it alone? Deviations from memorized language as a gauge of nativelike competence. In F. Meunier & S. Granger (Eds.), Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching (pp.123-147). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Yuliawati, S., Ekawati, D., & Mawarrani, R. E. (2021). Investigating lexical bundles in the corpora of English and Indonesian research articles with the sketch engine. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 20(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2021.20.2.5

Zare, J., & Valipouri, L. (2022). Lexical bundles in chemistry research articles. Front Psychol.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.906641




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i2.38505

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats