How do they interact? Exploring issues of interaction forms in an online writing classroom

Anak Agung Putri Maharani, Made Hery Santosa

Abstract


As the 21st century progresses, there is a growing emphasis on equipping students with essential skills, including writing, which is considered crucial to master. Online writing has become particularly significant in fostering this skill, as advanced technology enhances classroom activities and creates new opportunities for interaction between lecturers and students. This study aimed to assess the levels of six types of interaction, identify the forms of interaction students value most, determine the forms most frequently conducted by lecturers, and explore the benefits of these interactions in an online writing course. This study utilized a sequential explanatory design involving 122 respondents. Data were collected using two research instruments: a questionnaire and interviews. The findings revealed that respondents demonstrated two preferences for a high level of interaction, both of which showed a notable increase in the six forms of interaction. Among these, four types of interaction were perceived by students as playing a critical role in their online writing activities. However, only three forms of interaction were identified as being frequently implemented by the lecturer, reflecting an emphasis on student-centred learning. Each type of interaction was acknowledged as contributing distinct benefits to the students. This study underlines the importance of adopting diverse and student-centred interactions in online writing courses to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes.

Keywords


e-learning; online writing; student-centred learning; student interaction; virtue

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, T. (2004). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press.

Anderson, T., & Garrison, D. R. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In C. C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education: Institutional responses for quality outcomes (pp. 1-24). Atwood Publishing.

Asadi, N., Khodabandeh, F., & Yekta, R. R. (2019). Comparing and contrasting the interactional performance of teachers and students in traditional and virtual classrooms of advanced writing courses in distance education university. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.640552

Aydin, H. (2013). Interaction between teachers and students in online learning. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 14(3A), 1337-1352.

Babar, S., & Hidayat, M. (2022). Online flipped classroom (e-FCR): Way forward in Covid 19 era. Journal of Ayub Medical College, 34(4), 1056-1057. https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-04-S4-10282

Bair, D. E. (2011). Paradoxes of online teaching. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(2), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050210

Black, A. L., Crimmins, G., Dwyer, R., & Lister, V. (2020). Engendering belonging: Thoughtful gatherings with/in online and virtual spaces. Gender and Education, 32(1), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2019.1680808

Borba, M. C., Chiari, A. S. de S., & Almeida, H. R. F. L. de. (2018). Interactions in virtual learning environments: New roles for digital technology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(3), 269-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9812-9

Boyd, P. W. (2008). Analyzing students’ perceptions of their learning in online and hybrid first-year composition courses. Computers and Composition, 25(2), 224-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2008.01.002

Carliner, S., & Shank, P. (2008). The e-learning handbook: Past promises, present challenges. Pfeiffer.

Čėsnienė, Ž. (2015). Effects of the peer-review method on writing proficiency. Pedagogika, 120(4), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2015.038

Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Dharmadjaja, P. N., & Tiatri, S. (2021). The effect of online interaction types and acceptance of technology factors on student satisfaction with online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. In S. Tiatri & L. C. Seong (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Economics, Business, Social, and Humanities (ICEBSH 2021) (pp. 936-942). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210805.148

Dobie, T. E., & Anderson, E. R. (2015). Interaction in teacher communities: Three forms teachers use to express contrasting ideas in video clubs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.01.003

Ene, E., & Upton, T. A. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.005

Farisi, M. I. (2016). Developing 21st-century social studies skills through technology integration. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 16-30.

Fatma, N., & Mustafa. (2016). The effects of student-content interaction on academic performance in distance-learning courses. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 7(3), 60-68.

Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653

Goodwin, B. B., & Twani, E. (2017). Let’s rethink online learning. McREL International.

Gultom, A., & Suhartini. (2020). Student interaction, teacher competence, and technology in online learning: Does it create a meaningful learning? In A. Wiyarsi, W. S. B. Dwandaru, A. W. Subiantoro, A. Samsudin, & Pujianto (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020) (pp. 169-180). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.024

Harjanto, A. K., Sumardi, & Marmanto, S. (2022). Classroom interaction: A case study in Indonesian pre-service English teachers’ online writing course. International Journal of Education and Social Science Research, 5(3), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.37500/ijessr.2022.5311

Haro, A. V., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2018). The effects of an online learning environment with worked examples and peer feedback on students’ argumentative essay writing and domain-specific knowledge acquisition in the field of biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), 390-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1472132

Harper, B. (2018). Technology and teacher-student Interactions: A review of empirical research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(3), 214-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1450690

Henderson, K. (2021, June 23). Benefits of and strategies for teacher collaboration in strategies for teacher collaboration in MTSS. Branching Minds. https://www.branchingminds.com/blog/teacher-collaboration-mtss

Hewett, B. L. (2015). Reading to learn and writing to teach: Literacy strategies for online writing instruction. Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Inayati, N., Rachmadhani, R. A., & Utami, B. N. (2021). Student’s strategies in online autonomous English language learning. Journal of English Educators Society, 6(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.1035

Inoue, Y. (2010). Cases on online and blended learning technologies in higher education: Concepts and practices. IGI Global.

Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39, 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1355800021012139 9

Kayalis, T., & Natsina, A. (2010). Teaching literature at a distance: Open, online and blended learning. Continuum International Publishing Group.

Keengwe, J., & Schnellert, G. (2012). Fostering interaction to enhance learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 8(3), 28-35.

Kollof, M. A. (2011). Strategies for effective student/student interaction in online courses. In 17th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning (pp. 1-5). The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. https://studylib.net/doc/18404369/strategies-for-effective-student-student-interaction-in-o

Kozulin, A. (2015). Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 322-328). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.23094-8

Krishnamurthi, M. (2000). Enhancing student-teacher interactions in internet-based courses. In ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 2601-2610). Asee Peer. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--8359

Kumar, P., Saxena, C., & Baber, H. (2021). Learner-content interaction in e-learning- the moderating role of perceived harm of COVID-19 in assessing the satisfaction of learners. Smart Learning Environments, 8(5), Article number 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00149-8

Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education, 20(2014), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001

Kwak, S. (2017). Approaches reflected in academic writing MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 138-155. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2845

Leh, A. S. C., Kouba, B., & Davis, D. (2005). Twenty-first-century learning: Communities, interaction and ubiquitous computing. Educational Media International, 42(3), 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980500161296

Madland, C., & Richards, G. (2016). Enhancing student-student online interaction: Exploring the study buddy peer review activity. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(3), 158-175. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2179

Mafulah, S., Basthomi, Y., Cahyono, B. Y., & Suryati, N. (2023). Exploring Indonesian EFL teacher-student interactions in online learning. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 686-703. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.23804

Malinovski, T., Lazarova, M., & Trajkovik, V. (2012). Learner-content interaction in distance learning models: Students’ experience while using learning management systems. International Journal of Innovation in Education, 1(4), 362-376. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijiie.2012.052737

Martin, F., & Parker, M. (2014). Use of synchronous virtual classrooms: Why, who, and how? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 192-210.

Mehall, S. (2020). Purposeful interpersonal interaction in online learning: What is it and how is it measured? Online Learning, 24(1), 182-204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.2002

Meilleur, C. (2018, June 11). Online learning: 6 types of interactions at play. Knowledge One. https://knowledgeone.ca/online-learning-6-types-of-interactions-at-play/

Meri-Yilan, S. (2020). Writing online dialogue journals and penzu for student-teacher interaction and autonomous learning: A research plan. In O. Viberg, J. Mynard, W. Peeters, & M. Saqr (Eds.), Proceedings of the Harnessing the Potentials of Technology to Support Self-Directed Language Learning in Online Learning Settings Symposium (STELLA 2020) (Article number 5). CEUR-WS. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2828/article_5.pdf

Miao, J., & Ma, L. (2022). Students’ online interaction, self-regulation, and learning engagement in higher education: The importance of social presence to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 815220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815220

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Monalisa. (2017). Interaction in EFL writing class: Lecturers’ reflection. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 4(2), 144-155. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v4i2.8323

Morgan, L., Paucar-Caceres, A., & Wright, G. (2014). Leading effective global virtual teams: The consequences of methods of communication. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 27(1), 607-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-014-9315-2

Mynbayeva, A., Sadvakassova, Z., & Askalova, B. (2018). Pedagogy of the twenty-first century: Innovative teaching methods. New Pedagogical Challenges in the 21st Century - Contributions of Research in Education, 3-20. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72341

Nacu, D., Martin, C. K., & Pinkard, N. (2018). Designing for 21st-century learning online: A heuristic method to enable educator learning support roles. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 1029-1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9603-0

Nasihah, M., & Senta, A. N. (2022). Revealing the challenges and practical ways in teaching writing online. Journal of English for Academic and Specific Purposes (JEASP), 5(1), 297-302. https://doi.org/10.18860/jeasp.v5i1.16581

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. JALN, 6(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v6i1.1870

Pineteh, E. A. (2012). Using virtual interactions to enhance the teaching of communication skills to information technology students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01193.x

Rhode, J. F. (2009). Interaction equivalency in self-paced online learning environments: An exploration of learner preference. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(1), Article number 6. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i1.603

Riis-Johansen, M. O., & Myran, I. H. (2023). Patterns in naturally occurring interactions in early writing instruction. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984231213475

Saputra, F. (2019). The classroom interaction between a teacher and the tenth-grade students at SMA Al-Falah Islam Jambi [Unpublished master’s thesis] UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi.

Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082

Song, D., Rice, M., & Oh, E. Y. (2019). Participation in online courses and interaction with a virtual agent. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 20(1), 44-62. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3998

Sun, H. L., Sun, T., Sha, F. Y., Gu, X. Y., Hou, X. R., Zhu, F. Y., & Fang, P. T. (2022). The influence of teacher-student interaction on the effects of online learning: Based on a serial mediating model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 779217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779217

Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208

Tarrayo, V. N., Anudin, A. G., Mendoza, H. B., & Parungao-Callueng, E. S. (2022). Challenges and opportunities in teaching writing online amidst the pandemic: Voices from English language teachers in Philippine universities. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4), 74-90. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2022v47n4.5

The importance of teacher collaboration. (2017, June 8). Arkansas State University. https://degree.astate.edu/online-programs/education/master-of-science/ed-leadership/importance-of-teacher-collaboration/

Tu, C. H. (2001). How Chinese perceive social presence: An examination of interaction in online learning environment. Educational Media International, 38(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980010021235

Virtue, D. (2017). Increasing student interaction in technical writing courses in online environments. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 80(2), 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490617689880

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.38995

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 52 times
PDF - 31 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats