A corpus-based study of authorial presence in the academic writing of Indonesian higher education EFL learners

Suhandoko Suhandoko, Dian Riesti Ningrum, Ali Mustofa

Abstract


Using appropriate stance markers is essential to enhance argumentation. However, scholars have consistently reported that linguistic, cultural, and instructional factors make developing persuasive skills in L2 writing instruction challenging. This quantitative study employed a corpus-based methodology to investigate the use of stance markers in the academic writing of Indonesian EFL learners to establish persuasive arguments. The dataset comprises academic essays from 59 learners who were part of their academic writing coursework. The stance markers were identified using AntConc software and analyzed following Hylands (2019) stance framework. The research revealed learners reliance on transitions to create a logical structure in their text, while the use of boosters slightly surpasses the use of hedges, reflecting their growing understanding of the need to balance certainty with caution in academic writing. The high frequency of markers for disagreement and doubt indicates their ability to engage effectively with alternative viewpoints. The findings of this study challenge the stigma that Asian EFL learners are less assertive in expressing their arguments and challenging opposing views because they adhere to their cultural communicative norms. However, we found the limited use of markers indicating subjectivity and evaluation, which points to a potential gap in pedagogical approaches and suggests the need for more targeted instruction to bridge culturally appropriate communication norms and academic writing conventions.

Keywords


Corpus Analysis; Stance Markers; Indonesian EFL learners; Higher Education; Academic Writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alotaibi, H. S., & Arabi, H. (2020). Taking authorial stance in Arabic research articles introductions. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 20(2), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.20.2.2

Anthony, L. (2004). AntConc: A learner and classroom friendly, multi-platform corpus analysis toolkit. In L. Anthony, S. Fujita, & Y. Harada (Eds.), IWLeL 2004: An Interactive Workshop on Language e-Learning (pp. 7–13). Waseda University.

Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge University Press.

Chang, P. (2012). Using a stance corpus to learn about effective authorial stance-taking: A textlinguistic approach. ReCALL, 24(2), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000079

Chen, R. (2020). Single author self-reference: Identity construction and pragmatic competence. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 100856. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEAP.2020.100856

Deng, L., & He, P. (2023). “We may conclude that:” a corpus-based study of stance-taking in conclusion sections of RAs across cultures and disciplines. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1175144

Hashemi, M. R., & Hosseini, H. (2019). Stance and culture: A comparative study of English and Persian authorial stance in applied linguistics research articles. Advanced Education, 12. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.123284

Hidayat, R., Sukri, S., & Burhanuddin, B. (2023). Nasalization [N-] in Indonesian: Generative morphology perspective. Path of Science, 9(4), 4001–4009. https://doi.org/10.22178/POS.91-9

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse: English in a global context. Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2019). Points of reference: changing patterns of academic citation. Applied Linguistics, 40(1), 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx012

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2016). Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33(3), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316650399

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/APPLIN/25.2.156

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESP.2004.08.003

Lancaster, Z. (2014). Exploring valued patterns of stance in upper-level student writing in the disciplines. Written Communication, 31(1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515170

Lancaster, Z. (2016). Expressing stance in undergraduate writing: Discipline-specific and general qualities. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.006

Liu, Y., Hu, X., & Liu, J. (2022). A corpus-based study on Chinese and American students’ rhetorical moves and stance features in dissertation abstracts. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004744

Liu, Y., & Liu, J. (2019). A corpus-based comparative study of generality in Chinese EFL students’ and international scholars’ stance in academic writing. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 42(3), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2019-0023

Malawet, N., & Trakulkasemsuk, W. (2021). Use of adverbials in discussion sections of research articles in Thai and international journals. REFLections, 28(2), 228–247. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v28i2.253785

Nursanti, E., Andriyanti, E., & Wijaya, I. A. (2023). (Im)politeness employed by multilingual Indonesian EFL learners in argumentative conversations. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 1000–1021. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.26033

Pérez Blanco, M. (2016). The construction of attitudinal stance: A corpus-based contrastive study of negative evaluative adjectives in English and Spanish opinion discourse. Languages in Contrast, 16(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.16.1.02per

Qiu, X., & Jiang, F. (2021). Stance and engagement in 3 MT presentations: How students communicate disciplinary knowledge to a wide audience. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, 100976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100976

Sabzevar, A., Haghverdi, H., & Biriya, R. (2019). A corpus-based analysis of epistemic stance adverbs in essays written by native English speakers and Iranian EFL learners. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 12(25), 32–52.

Shen, Q., & Tao, Y. (2021). Stance markers in English medical research articles and newspaper opinion columns: A comparative corpus-based study. PLoS ONE, 16(3 March), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247981

Sirijanchuen, N., & Gampper, C. (2018). Academic citations within rhetorical move structures in ELT research article introductions written by Thai and international scholars. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 11(2), 1–20.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Pres.

Tang, R., & John, S. (1999). The “I” in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5

Warschauer, M. (2017). The pitfalls and potential of multimodal composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 86–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSLW.2017.10.005

Yang, W. (2020). A keyword analysis of stance and engagement in three-minute thesis (3MT) presentations. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 20(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2002-01

Yoon, H. J. (2021). Interactions in EFL argumentative writing: effects of topic, L1 background, and L2 proficiency on interactional metadiscourse. Reading and Writing, 34(3), 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11145-020-10085-7/TABLES/7

Zhang, L., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Development and validation of the questionnaire on EFL students’ perceptions of authorial stance in academic writing. In Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2021-0003

Zhang, L., & Zhang, L. J. (2023). Improving EFL students’ stance-taking in academic writing with SFL-based instruction: A qualitative inquiry. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231164758

Zhang, L., Zhang, L. J., & Xu, T. S. (2023). Effects of teacher explicit instruction in stance-taking on students’ perceptions of stance and on their academic writing beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1140050




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i3.39813

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats