Exploring reading self-efficacy among EFL learners from different academic disciplines

Patsawut Sukserm

Abstract


Reading self-efficacy plays a crucial role in the academic success of EFL learners, yet the extent to which it varies across academic disciplines remains underexplored. This study aims to (1) examine the level of reading self-efficacy among EFL learners from business, social sciences, and sciences; (2) investigate the relationship between different components of reading self-efficacy; and (3) compare self-efficacy levels across these academic disciplines. A total of 217 university-level EFL students in Thailand participated in the study. A 25-item reading self-efficacy questionnaire with strong reliability (Cronbachs alpha = 0.915) was employed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and ANOVA. The results reveal significant positive correlations between assessment of content (AOC) and summary of content (SOC) (r = 0.522, p 0.001), and between opinion on content (OOC) and SOC (r = 0.387, p 0.001). ANOVA results indicate significant differences in recognition of content elements (ROE) across disciplines, with business students scoring higher than science students (p = 0.015). Business students also demonstrated significantly higher self-efficacy in OOC compared to social science and science students (p = 0.001). These findings suggest that reading self-efficacy is influenced by students academic disciplines, supporting the view that self-efficacy is task-specific and context-dependent. Therefore, EFL instructors should implement tailored instructional approaches that address discipline-specific reading challenges to enhance students reading confidence and academic performance.

Keywords


Reading Self-Efficacy; Reading skills; Academic Disciplines; EFL Learners; University level

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alzukari, R. (2024). Academic Self-efficacy, Achievement Motivation, and Academic Success of International Graduate Students (Order No. 31485193). Available from Publicly Available Content Database. (3095927037). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/academic-self-efficacy-achievement-motivation/docview/3095927037/se-2

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Anderson, R. C. (2000). Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts. Psychology Press.

Anderson, R. C. (2000). Theoretical models and processes of reading. International Reading Association.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans, Green.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Longman.

Hasyim, F. (2018). The effects of self-efficacy on motivation of reading English academic text. Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies, 5(1), 25-34.

Kang, H. (2021). Sample size determination and power analysis using the G* Power software. Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 18, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17

Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394.

Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives,

the classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective domain. David McKay Co., Inc.

Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Heinemann.

Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic Motivation of Adolescents (pp. 1-26). IAP.

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press.

Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 207-231.

Sukserm, P., Masantiah, C. & Saengngam, J. (2023). Exploratory Factor Analysis of Self-Efficacy in English Reading of Tertiary Students. Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University, 27(2), 149–163.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.

Turney, S. (2022). Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r): ): ): Guide & Examples. Scribbr. https:// www.scribbr.com/statistics/pearson-correlation- coefficient/

Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751-796.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i3.41863

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats