Needs Analysis for developing augmented reality-based critical reading materials for EFL students

Ida Yulianawati, Zubaedah Wiji Lestari, Syafryadin Syafryadin, Natalia Anggrarini

Abstract


English has been a compulsory subject in higher education across Indonesia. However, concerns about students proficiency remain widespread. Despite the importance of integrating technology into English instruction, especially for enhancing critical reading and thinking skills, many teachers still rely on intuition rather than a systematic needs analysis when developing teaching materials. Consequently, the content often fails to address learners actual needs or improve language mastery effectively. This study aims to explore the specific needs and challenges EFL students face in developing critical reading skills and their perceptions of augmented reality (AR)-based materials used in such classes. A mixed-methods approach was employed, involving surveys and interviews with 79 purposively selected students from two private universities in West Java, Indonesia. Findings revealed that students commonly use online platforms as sources for critical reading activities. They acknowledged the importance of critical reading and expressed that AR significantly enhanced their engagement and fostered independent learning. Pedagogical advantages of AR-based materials included promoting multisensory learning, improving students critical literacy and confidence, increasing enjoyment, and supporting a student-centered approach to technology. Additionally, AR allowed for the integration of virtual and real-world element in meaningful learning environments, which helped reduce cognitive load. The students also recognized ARs role in expanding access to education by making learning experiences more inclusive, engaging, and responsive to diverse learning preferences. Overall, AR-based materials were perceived as a valuable tool to support the development of critical reading skills in English language education.

Keywords


Augmented Reality, Critical Reading; Critical Thinking; Material Development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Roomy, M. A. (2022). Investigating the effects of critical reading skills on students’ reading comprehension. Arab World English Journal, 13(1), 366-381. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.24

Baba, J., & Affendi, F. R. (2020). Reading habit and students’ attitudes towards reading: A study of students in the faculty of education UiTM Puncak Alam. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(1), 109-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i1.8988

Bråten, I., & Braasch, J. L. (2017). Key issues in research on students’ critical reading and learning in the 21st-century information society. Improving reading and reading engagement in the 21st century: International research and innovation, 77-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4331-4_4

Brown, C. W. (2022). Taking action through redesign: Norwegian EFL learners engaging in critical visual literacy practices. Journal of Visual Literacy, 41(2), 91-112.

Charff, M., & Jensen, L. (2019). Enhancing critical reading through e-readers: A classroom approach. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(1), 75-92.

Chea, P., & Chaijaroen, S. (2019). Design and development of a constructivist web-based learning environment with augmented Reality to enhance critical reading for first-year information technology students of a two-year college in Cambodia. In Innovative Technologies and Learning: Second International Conference, ICITL 2019, Tromsø, Norway, December 2–5, 2019, Proceedings 2 (pp. 527-536). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35343-8_56

Creswell, J. W. (1999). Mixed-method research: Introduction and application. In Handbook of educational policy (pp. 455-472). Academic press.

Damayanti, I. L., Derinalp, P., Asyifa, F., & Suryatama, K. (2024). Exploring English for Academic Purposes Program: Needs analysis and impact evaluation. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(3), 1616-1635

Devagiri, J. S., Paheding, S., Niyaz, Q., Yang, X., & Smith, S. (2022). Augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence in industry: Trends, tools, and future challenges. Expert Systems with Applications, 207, 118002.

Din, M. (2020). Evaluating university students’ critical thinking ability as reflected in their critical reading skill: A study at bachelor level in Pakistan. Thinking Skill and Creativity, 35, 100627.Al Roomy, M. A. (2022). Investigating the Effects of Critical Reading Skills on Students’ Reading Comprehension. Arab World English Journal, 13(1), 366-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100627

Ebadi, S., & Ashrafabadi, F. (2022). An exploration into the impact of augmented Reality on EFL learners’ Reading comprehension. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9745-9765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11021-8

Fuad, M., Suyanto, E., Muhammad, U. A., & Suparman, S. (2023). Indonesian students’ reading literacy ability in the cooperative, integrated reading and composition learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(4), 2121-2129. http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i4.25171

Fukuda, S. T., Lander, B. W., & Pope, C. J. (2024). EXPLORING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT WITH FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT AND ICT TOOLS. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 27(2), 911-930.

Gönen, S. İ. K., & Kızılay, Y. (2022). Reading beyond the lines: Teaching critical reading in higher education. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 22(1). https://www.readingmatrix.com/files/27-mb6vs3ty.pdf

Hatlevik, O. E., Throndsen, I., Loi, M., & Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2018). Students’ ICT self-efficacy and computer and information literacy: Determinants and relationships. Computers & Ed cation, 118, 107-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.011

Henry, C. C., & Mohamad, M. (2021). The use of mobile technology in enhancing the critical reading skills of pre-university ESL students. Creative Education, 12(3), 678-695. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.123047

Hung, C. Y., Lin, Y. T., Yu, S. J., & Sun, J. C. Y. (2023). Effects of AR‐and VR‐based wearables in teaching English: The application of an ARCS model‐based learning design to improve elementary school students' learning motivation and performance. Journal of computer-assisted learning, 39(5), 1510-1527.

Jamaluddin, N., Huang, R., & Lin, Y. (2022). Collaborative approaches to AR-based critical reading. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(2), 230-246.

Jamrus, M. H. M., & Razali, A. B. (2019). Augmented reality in teaching and learning English reading: realities, possibilities, and limitations. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 724-737. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i4/6696

Javorcikova, J., & Badinská, M. (2022). Reading and critical thinking skills of undergraduate students: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 655-666. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2104655J

Jones, M., & Smith, P. (2021). Addressing gaps in tertiary students’ critical reading skills. Higher Education Review, 47(2), 187-205.

Kaur, R., & Ahmed, S. (2021). User-centered design principles for AR in education. Educational Technology Research & Development, 69(5), 343-361.

King-O’Brien, K. (2021). Writing back to the news” reading the news as a pedagogical strategy to empower students, improve their critical reading skills, and fight “fake news. Pedagogy, 21(2, 295-309.

Lee, J., Wang, Y., & Chen, P. (2023). Augmented Reality in active learning for critical reading. Computers in Education Journal, 56(1), 17-34.

Li, C. S., & Wan, R. (2022). Critical reading in higher education: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101028

Malekani, A. W. (2023). Use pattern of social networks among undergraduate students and its implications on library use and usefulness in higher learning institutions. Access: An International Journal of Nepal Library Association, 2(01), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.3126/access.v2i01.58890

Marrahí-Gómez, V., & Belda-Medina, J. (2022). The application of augmented Reality (AR) to language learning and its impact on student motivation. International Journal of Linguistics Studies, 2(2), 07-14.

Mokmin, N. A. M., Hanjun, S., Jing, C., & Qi, S. (2024). Impact of an AR-based learning approach on the learning achievement, motivation, and cognitive load of students on a design course. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(2), 557-574.

Nygren, T., & Guath, M. (2022). Students evaluating and corroborating digital news. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(4), 549-565. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1897876

O’Brien, J., & Kin, M. (2021). Incorporating news reading into critical reading curricula. Educational Strategies Quarterly, 15(3), 54-73.

OECD. PISA 2022 Results. https://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/

Ozensoy, A. U. (2021). The effect of critical reading skill on academic success in social studies. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 93, 319-337. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2021.93.15

Pitafai, S. (2022). A study of the investigation of English reading comprehension of undergraduate students using online newspaper. Journal of Asin Language Teaching and Learning (Online), 3(1), 41–52. Retrieved from https://so10.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jote/article/view/502

Piriyasurawong, P. (2020). Scaffolding augmented reality model to enhance deep Reading skills. TEM Journal, 9 4), 1760-1764. http://dx.doi.org/10.18421/TEM94-58

Rahim, W., Nipa, M. N., Sami, S. R., & Emti, S. H. (2023). Exploring the Challenges in Developing Reading Skills at the Tertiary Level: A Study in the Asian EFL Context of Bangladesh.

Robinson, J. (2022). Gathering data for instructional design: Needs analysis strategies. Instructional Design Review, 33(1), 45-62.

Runge, S., & Clayton-Code, K. (2024). Technology in the metro classroom: Twitter as a tool for student engagement. Kentucky Journal of Excellence in College Teaching & Learning, 20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286948393_Tweeters_on_Campus_Twitter_a_Learning_Tool_in_Classroom

Saidin, N. F., Abd Halim, N. D., Yahaya, N., & Zulkifli, N. N. (2024). Enhancing students’ critical thinking and visualization skills through mobile augmented Reality. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 16(1), 1-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2024.16.001

Sart, G. (2023). The effects of effective usage and the development of technology as 21st-century skills on university students' self-confidence. In EDULEARN23 proceedings (pp. 8546-8546). IATED.

Shane-Simpson, C., Manago, A., Gaggi, N., & Gillespie-Lynch, K. (2018). Why do college students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computers in human behavior, 86, 276-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.041

Şimşek, B., & Direkçi, B. (2023). The effects of augmented reality storybooks on student’s reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(3), 754-772. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13293

Şimşek, B., Direkci, B., Koparan, B., Canbulat, M., Gülmez, M., & Nalçacıgil, E. (2024). Examining the effect of augmented reality experience duration on reading comprehension and cognitive load. Education and Information Technologies, 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13293

Soroya, S. H., & Ameen, K. (2020). Millennials’ Reading behavior in the digital age: A case study of Pakistani university students. Journal of Library Administration, 60(5), 559-577.

Sulistyanto, H., Prayitno, H. J., Narimo, S., Anif, S., Sumardjoko, B., & Wardhani, N. W. (2024). A study of the use of Augmented Reality in learning: Impacts on increasing students’ critical thinking skills. Asian Journal of University Education, 20(2), 369-379. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v20i2.27093

Sural, I. (2018). Augmented reality experience: Initial perceptions of higher education students. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 565-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11435a

Sutherland, A., & Incera, S. (2021). Critical reading: What do faculty think students should do?. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 51(4), 267-290.

Thompson, S., & Thompson, N. (2023). The critically reflective practitioner. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Wang, Y., & Chen, P. (2020). Scaffolding reading processes with AR applications. Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 56-68.

Wulandari, M., & Purnamaningwulan, R. A. (2024). EXPLORING INDONESIAN EFL PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS EXPERIENCES IN AI-ASSISTED TEACHING PRACTICUM: BENEFITS AND DRAWBACKS. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 27(2), 878-894.

Yu, S. J., Hsueh, Y. L., Sun, J. C. Y., & Liu, H. Z. (2021). Developing an intelligent virtual reality interactive system based on the ADDIE model for learning pour-over coffee brewing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100030

Yulian, R. (2022). Developing Augmented Reality (AR) as Assisted Technology in Reading Based on Content-Language Integrated Learning. JTP-Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 24(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v24i1.23626

Yunus, M., & Ubaidillah, M. F. (2021). EFL teacher educators’ experiences in teaching critical reading: evidence from Indonesia. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 11(2), 422-441. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v11i2.3133

Zhao, W., & Farhana, N. (2023). The participatory role in designing AR applications. Educational Design Quarterly, 19(3), 87-101.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i3.43391

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats