Bacterial pathogens associated with eyeglasses and risks of infection: A cross-sectional study in South-West Nigeria

Seyi Samson Enitan, Okeoghene Marcel Edafetanure-Ibeh, Grace Eleojo Itodo, Michael Olugbamila Dada, Grace Oluwatoyin Mensah-Agyei, Richard Yomi Akele, Stephen Olasebikan Makanjuola, Saratu Omagbemi Ajike, Nwachi Idume Ogbonna, Jamiu Monsur Olalekan

Abstract


Ocular infections have been associated with bacterial contamination of eyeglasses. This study assessed bacterial contaminants associated with the eyeglasses of the staff and students of Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria. A total of 100 participants comprising 33 males and 67 females (aged 16-76 years) were recruited for the study after obtained the written informed consents. A structured questionnaire was used to collect the demographic and clinical information. A total of 100 eyeglasses were examined for bacterial contamination using standard bacteriological methods. A one–way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey–Kramer multiple comparisons test were used to determine the differences between the bacterial loads among the eyeglasses of study participants. We found that the percentage of eyeglass lenses with unacceptable levels of contamination (>105CFU/mL) and acceptable levels of contamination were 19% and 46%, respectively. The percentages of eyeglass handles with unacceptable and accepted level of contamination were 49% and 7%, respectively. Most of the isolated bacteria were sensitive to the tested antibiotics. Risk factors associated with bacterial contamination of eyeglasses were exposure to dusty environment, irregular cleaning, and poor compliance with eyeglass care guidelines. Our study further underscores the claim that eyes glasses may serve as potential vehicles for bacteria capable of causing ocular infections.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bauer A. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Am J clin pathol 1966; 45:149-158.

Butt U, et al. Infection risk from surgeons' eyeglasses. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 2012; 20(1):75-77.

Charan J and Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian journal of psychological medicine 2013; 35(2):121-126.

Cheesbrough M. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, in: Cheesbrough Me (Ed.) District Laboratory Practice in Topical Countries, Part 2. 2006a. Cambridge university press, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 132-142.

Cheesbrough M. Biochemical tests to identify bacteria, in: Cheesbrough Me (Ed.) District Laboratory Practice in Topical Countries, Part 2. 2006b. Cambridge university press, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 63-70.

Cheesbrough M. Klebsiellae, in: Cheesbrough Me (Ed.) District Laboratory Practice in Topical Countries, Part 2. 2006c. Cambridge university press, Cape Town, South Africa, p. 187.

Cheesbrough M. Staphylococcus aureus, in: Cheesbrough Me (Ed.) District Laboratory Practice in Topical Countries, Part 2. 2006d. Cambridge university press, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 178-179.

Cobo F. 2022. Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Clinical Findings of Anaerobic Bacteria. MDPI, p. 351.

Cowan S, et al. A classification of the Klebsiella group. Microbiology 1960; 23(3):601-612.

Enitan SS, et al. Fungal Pathogens Associated with Hair Combs Used by Undergraduate Female Students of a Private University in South West Nigeria: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Anti-Fungal Susceptibility Study. 2020.

Francis RH, et al. The case for using evidence-based guidelines in setting hospital and public health policy. Frontiers in surgery 2016; 3:20.

Girma A and Aemiro A. The Bacterial Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Urinary Tract Infection Patients at Pawe General Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Scientifica 2022; 2022.

Graham JE, et al. Ocular pathogen or commensal: a PCR-based study of surface bacterial flora in normal and dry eyes. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2007; 48(12):5616-5623.

Junior IOD, et al. Clinical Characteristics of External Ocular and Periocular Infections and Their Antimicrobial Treatment Patterns Among a Ghanaian Ophthalmic Population; A Multicenter Study. 2022.

Kaschke M, et al. Optical devices in ophthalmology and optometry: technology, design principles and clinical applications. 2013.

Kayser FH, et al. Bacteria as human pathogens. Medical Microbiology. Thieme, London 2005; 254.

Lange VR. Eyewear contamination levels in the operating room: Infection risk. American journal of infection control 2014; 42(4):446-447.

Miles AA, et al. The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. Epidemiology & Infection 1938; 38(6):732-749.

Nwaugo V, et al. Fungal contamination of eye lenses and frames of patients attending optometry clinic at Abia State University, Uturu, Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology 2008; 7(19).

Ochei JO and Kolhatkar AA. Medical laboratory science: theory and practice. McGraw Hill Education, 2000.

Osaro-Matthew RC, et al. Bacterial contamination of medicated glasses amongst staff and students of Michael Okpara University of Agriculture Umudike, Nigeria. The International Journal of Science and Technoledge 2015; 3(9):261.

Schaftenaar E, et al. Ocular infections in sub‐Saharan Africa in the context of high HIV prevalence. Tropical Medicine & International Health 2014; 19(9):1003-1014.

Willcox MD. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and inflammation during contact lens wear: a review. Optometry and Vision Science 2007; 84(4):273-278.

Wu YT, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa survival at posterior contact lens surfaces after daily wear. Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry 2015; 92(6):659.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/tigh.v2i2.28488

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



2021 | Trends in Infection and Global Health (TIGH)