Efek Penggunaan Sinbiotik Terhadap Kondisi Miklofora dan Histologi Usus Ayam Sentul Jantan

Eko Fauzi Hartono, Ning Iriyanti, Sri Suhermiyati

Abstract


ABSTRAK. Sinbiotik merupakan gabungan dari probiotik dan prebiotik yang dapat memperbaiki mikroflora di saluran pencernaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi penggunaan sinbiotik sebagai feed aditif terhadap jumlah Bakteri Asam Laktat (BAL), Escherichia colli, histologi tinggi dan lebar vili usus. Perlakuan R0 = Pakan kontrol, R1 Sinbiotik alami (2%), R2 = Sinbiotik Alami (4%), R3 = Sinbiotik Alami (6%), R4 = Sinbiotik Komersil (2%), R5 = Sinbiotik Komersil (4%), R6 = Sinbiotik Komersil (6%). Analisis statistik yang digunakan adalah ANOVA (Analisis Varian) dan uji lanjut menggunakan Orthogonal kontras. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pemberian sinbiotik alami berpengaruh nyata (P<0,05) terhadap kondisi mikroflora usus, meningkatkan jumlah bakteri asam laktat, dan menurunkan jumlah Escherichia colli) sedangkan pemberian perlakuan sinbiotik alami berpengaruh nyata (P<0,05) terhadap histologi tinggi dan lebar vili usus. Simpulan dari penelitian adalah penggunaan Sinbiotik Alami 2% dapat meningkatkan, jumlah bakteri asam laktat di duodenum, jejenum dan ileum, menurunkan bakteri Escherichia colli di ileum. Penggunaan sinbiotik komersil 4% meningkatkan, tinggi vili usus duodenum, jejenum dan ileum, dan lebar vili di ileum.

 

(Effect synbiotic usage toward microbiological and hystological states of sentul rooster intestine) 

ABSTRACT. Symbiotic is a combination of probiotic and prebiotic used to improve microflora in digestive system. This study aims to evaluate the symbiotic usage as a feed additive toward the number of lactic acid bacteria, Escherichia coli, the height and the width of villi. Treatment R0 = Diet control, R1 Natural Symbiotic (2%), R2 = Natural Symbiotic (4%), R3 = Natural Symbiotic (6%), R4 = Commercial Symbiotic (2%), R5 = Commercial Symbiotic (4%), R6 = Commercial Symbiotic (6%). Statistical analysis uses ANOVA (Analysis of Variant), while further test uses orthogonal contrast. The result showed that the given symbiotic was significantly (P<0,05) effect toward the condition of intestinal microflora, it increases the number of lactic acid bacteria and decreases Escherichia coli, as well as the treatment (P<0,05) toward histology of the height and the width of intestinal villi. As the conclusion, the use of 2% of natural symbiotic increases the amount of lactic acid bacteria in duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, but reduces Escherichia coli in ileum, the height of intestinal villi in duodenum and the width of intestinal villi in ileum, and administered 4% of commercial symbiotic increases the height of intestinal villi in duodenum, jejunum, ileum and the width of intestinal villi in ileum.

Keywords


Sinbiotik; bakteri asam laktat; Escherichia colli; vili usus; Symbiotic; Lactic acid bacteria; intestinal villi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azhar, M. 2009. Inulin sebagai prebiotik. Sainstek 12 (1):1-8.

Bedford, M., 2000. Removal of antibiotic growth promoters from poultry diets: Implications and strategies to minimize subsequent problems. World. Poultry Sci. J. 56:347-365.

Cao, BH., Karasawa, Y., Gou YM., 2005. Effect of green tea polyphenols and fructo-oligosaccharides in semi-furified diets on broiler’ performance and caecal microflora and their metabolites. Asian Australasian J of Anim Sci 18: 85-89.

Cappuccino, G. J., and Sherman, N., 2008. Microbiology a Laboratory Manual 8 Edition. State University of New York, Rockland Community College. United States.

Cumming JH, Macfarlane GT, Englyst HN. 2001. Prebiotik digestion and fermentation. Am J Clin Nurt 73:415-20.

Dellman, H.D., and E.M. Brown. 1992. Buku Teks Histologi Veteriner Edisi 3. Penerjemah : R. Hartono dan Siti S.J. Cetakan 1. UI-Press. Jakarta.

Fardiaz, D. 1992. Mikrobiologi Pengolahan Pangan. Pusat Antar Universitas. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Fukata T, Sasai K, Miyamoto T, Baba E. 1999. Inhibitory effect of competitive exclusion and fructo-oligosaccharide, singly and in combination, on Salmonella colonization of chick. J Food Protect 62:229-233

Fuller, R. 1992. History and development of probiotics. In: Probiotics The Scientific Basis. Fuller. (Ed.). Chapman & Hall. London, New York, Tokyo, Melbourne, Madras

Fuller, R. 1997. Probiotics 2 : Application and Practical Aspect. Chapman and Hall. London

Gomez-Alcon, R.A., Dudas, C., Huber, J.T., 1990. Influence of cultures of Aspergillus oryzae on rumen and tract digestibility of dietary component. J. Dairy Sci. 73:703-710.

Grimes, J.L., D.V. Maurice, S.F. Lightsey and J.G. Lopez, 1997. The effect of dietary Komersil® on layer hen performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 6: 399-403.

Gunal, M., Yayli, G., Kaya, O., Karahan, N., and Sulak, O., 2006. The Effects of Antibiotic Growth Promoter, Probiotic or Organic Acid Supplementation on Performance, Intestinal Microflora and Tissue of Broilers International Journal of Poultry Science 5 (2) : 149 – 155, 2006.

Hardiningsih, R., Napitupulu, R.N.R dan Yulinery, T., 2006. Isolasi dan uji resistensi beberapa isolat lactobacillus pada pH rendah. Biodiversitas 7(1): 15-17

Husmaini, Abbas, M.H., Purwati, E., Yuniza, A and Alimon, A.R., 2011. Growth and survival of lactic acid bacteria isolated from by product of virgin coconat oil as probiotic candidate for poultry. Internasional journal of poultry science 10(4): 309-314.

Iji, P. A., Hughes, R. J,. Choet, M &. Tivey, R. R., 2002. Intestinal structure and function of broiler chickens on wheat-based diets supplemented with a microbial enzyme. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14: 54-60.

Iriyanti, N., dan Rimbawanto E.A., 2001. Inokulasi Probiotik Lactobacillus Spp. Asal Ayam Buras Sebagai Upaya Perbaikan Performans Ayam Petelur. Laporan Penelitian. Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Jenderal Soedirman. Purwokerto.

Iskandar, S., Setioko, A.R., Sopiyana, S., Y. Saefudin, Suharto dan W. Diedjopratono. 2004. Keberadaan dan karakter ayam Pelung, Kedu dan Sentul di lokasi asal. Pros. Seminar Nasional Klinik Teknologi Pertanian Sebagai Basis Pertumbuhan Usaha Agribisnis Menuju Petani Nelayan Mandiri. Manado 9 – 10 Juni 2004. Puslitbang Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, Bogor. hlm. 1021 – 1033.

Kusuma, I.G.E., Arjana, A.A.G., dan. Berata, I.K., 2012. Pemberian Effective Microorganism (Em4®) Terhadap Gambaran Histopatologi Hati Tikus Putih (Rattus Norvegicus) Betina. Indonesia Medicus Veterinus 1(5): 582-595.

Kusumawati, I,. Zaini, N.C., 2005. Pengaruh Senyawa Prebiotik dari Bawan Merah (Allium cepa) Terhadap Pertumbuhan Bakteri Probiotik. Majalah Farmasi Erlangga, Vol.5 (1):20-24.

Mamiek, B., 1993. Fermacto versus enzymes. Fermacto. Pet. Ag. Inc. ed., Elgin, IL, USA.

McNaught, C.E., and MacFie, J., 2000. Probiotics in clinical practice: a critical review of the evidence. Int Dairy J. Nutr. Res. 21: 343-353.

Mile, R.D., Butcher, G.D., Henry, P.R. dan Littell, R.C. 2006. Effect of antibiotic growth promoters on broiler performance, intestinal growth parameter, and quantitative morphology. Journal Poultry Science 85: 476- 485.

Mounzouris, KC., Tsirtsikos, P., Kalamara E.,. Nitsch, S.,. Schatzmayr, G., Fegeros, K., 2007. Evaluation of the efficacy of probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus and Pediococcus strain in promoting boiler performance and modulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poult Sci .86: 309-317.

Piray, A.H., Kermanshahi, H., Tahmasbi, A.M., Bahrampour, J., 2007. Effects of cecal cultures and aspergillus meal prebiotic (Fermacto) on growth performance and organ weights of broiler chickens. Int. J. Poultry. Sci. 6:340-344.

Purwati, E., Syukur, S dan Hidayat, Z., 2005. Lactobacillus sp. Isolasi dari biovicophitomega sebagai probiotik. Proceeding Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia, Jakarta 24-25 Januari 2005.

Rebole A., L. T., Ortiz, M. L., Rodriguez, C., Alzueta, J. Trevino and S. Velasco. 2010. Effect of inulin and enzyme complex, individually or in combination, on growth performance, intestinal microflora, caecal fermentation characteristics and jejuna histomorphology in broiler chicken fed a wheat and barley-based diet. Poult Sci. 89:276-278.

Roberfroid MB. Inulin-type fructans: functional food ingredients. Journal of Nutr. 2007; 137(11):2493S–2502S.

Salminen S. dan Yuan, K. L., 2009. Handbook of Probiotics and Prebiotiks 2nd Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.

Samanta, S., Haldar, S., Ghosh TK., 2010. Comparative efficacy of and organic acid blend and bacitracin methylene disalicylate as growth promoters in broiler chickens: Effects on performance, gut histology, and small intestinal milieu. Vet. Med. Int; Article ID 645150.

Schmidl, M.K., and. Labuza, T.P., 2000. Functional Foods. Aspen Publisher, Maryland.

Smirnov, A., Perez, R., Amit-Romach, E., Sklan, D., Uni, Z., (2005) Mucin Dynamics and Microbial Populations in Chicken Small Intestine Are Changed by Dietary Probiotic and Antibiotic Growth Promoter Supplementation. J. Nutr. 135:187–192.

Solis de los Santos, F., Farnell, M.B., Tellez, G., Balog, J.M., Anthony, N.B., Torres- Rodriguez, A., Higgins, S., Hargis, B.M., Donoghue, A.M., 2005. Effect of Prebiotik on Gut Development and Ascites Incidence of Broilers Reared in a Hypoxic Environment. Poultry Sci. 84:1092-1100.

Sumarsih,S., Sulistiyanto, B., Sutrisno, C.I., dan Rahayu, E.S., 2012. Peran Probiotik Bakteri Asam Laktat Terhadap Produktivitas Unggas. FPP UNDIP Semarang – FTP UGM Yogyakarta.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1995. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika. Edisi kedua. Gramedia, Jakarta.

Ten Bruggencate SJM, Bovee-Oudenhoven IMJ, Lentink-Wissink MLG, Vander Meer R. 2003. Dietary fructo-oligosaccharides dosedependently increase translocation of Salmonella in rats. J Nutr 1333:2313-2318.

Yakhkeshi, S., Rahimi, S., Gharib, Naseri, K., 2011. The effect of comparison of herbal extract, antibiotic, probiotic and organic acid on serum lipids, immune response, GIT microbial population, intestinal morphology and performance of broiler. Journal of medicinal plants (10). 80-95.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17969/agripet.v16i2.5179

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Agripet

License URL: http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/agripet/about/submissions#copyrightNotice


Creative Commons LicenseISSN: 1411-4623E-ISSN: 2460-4534
Copyright© 2000-2024 | ISSN: 1411-4623 | EISSN: 2460-4534 
Jurnal Agripet is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Published by: 
Animal Husbandry DepartmentThe Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Syiah Kuala 
associated with Animal Scientist's Society of Indonesia (HILPI)
Jl. Tgk. Hasan Krueng Kalee No. 3, Kopelma Darussalam,
Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia.
Phone: +62-81383736633
Email: jurnalagripet@usk.ac.id


Online Submissions & Guidelines Editorial Policies | Contact Statistics Indexing | Citations