Seleksi in Vitro Genotipe Mutan (M3) Kipas Putih untuk Toleransi terhadap Kekeringan
Abstract
Selection of 3rd generation soybean mutants (M3) of Kipas Putih has been selected for tolerance of drought stress. The research was conducted at the Tissue Culture Laboratory of Faculty of Agriculture, Syiah Kuala University, Darussalam - Banda Aceh. Gamma ray irradiation was performed at Puslitbang Teknologi Isotop dan Radiasi BATAN, Pasar Jumat Jakarta. Seed of Varietas Wilis and Dering soy bean was used as control for drought tolerant and Kipas Putih was used as original variety. Selection was performed in vitro by using 20% Polyethylene Glycol (PEG). The results showed there were 8 genotype mutants categorized as tolerant to drought stress, ie KP100-26, KP100-28, KP200-31A, KP200-38, KP200-51, KP200-62, KP300-34, and KP300-47. Eleven mutan genotypes were categorized as medium tolerant and six genotypes were sensitive to drought. Selection of M4 generation selected lines are needed to find the drought tolerant and high-yielding mutant.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aisyah, S. I., H. Aswidinoor, A. Saefuddin, B. MArwoto, dan S. Sastrosumarjo. 2009. Induksi mutasi pada stek pucuk anyelir (Dianthus caryophyllus Linn.) melalui iradiasi sinar gamma. J. Agron. Indonesia. 37(1):62-70
Atman. 2009. Strategi Peningkatan Produksi Kedelai di Indonesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Tambua, Vol. VIII, No.1, Januari-April 2009: 39-45.
Badan Tenaga Nuklir Nasional. 2010. Kedelai Varietas Unggul Baru Hasil Pemuliaan Mutasi Radiasi. www.batan.go.id/kip/documents/Kedelai.
Ben-Hayyim, G. 1987). Relationship between Salt Tolerance and Resistance to Polyethylene Glycol-Induced Water Stress in Cultured Citrus. Plant Physiology, 85, 430-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.85.2.430.
Biswas, J., B. Chowdhury, A. Bhattacharya, and A.B. Mandal. 2002. In vitro screening for increased drought tolerance in rice. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 38:525–530.
Crowder, L. V. 2006. Genetika Tumbuhan. (diterjemahkan oleh Lilik Kusdiarti). Yogyakarta: UGM Press
Fischer, R.A. and Maurer, R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. l. Grain yield response. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 29, 897-912.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897
Hamayun, M., Khan, S.A., Shinwari, Z.K., Khan, A.L., Ahmad, N. and Lee, I. 2010. Effect of Polyethylene Glycol Induced Drought Stress on Physio-Hormonal Attributes of Soybean. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42, 977-986.
Herison, C., Rustikawati, Sujono H. S., Syarifah I. A. 2008. Induksi mutasi melalui iradiasi sinar gamma terhadap benih untuk meningkatkan keragaman populasi dasar jagung (Zea mays L.). Akta Agrosia 11(1):57-62.
Imran, M., Abdul, R., Ishfaq, A.H., Shuaib, K., Ahmad, A.K., Abdul, Q. and Muhammad, A. 2012. Interaction of Callus Selection Media and Stress Duration for in Vitro Selection of Drought Tolerant Callus of Wheat. African Journal of Biotechnology, 4000-4006.
Khodarahmpour, Z. 2011. Effect of Drought Stress Induced by Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) on Germination Indices in Corn (Zea mays L.) Hybrids. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 18222-18227.
Kong, L., S.M. Attree, L.C. Fowkw. 1998. Effects of polyethylene glycol and methylglyoxal bis (guanylhydrazone) on endogenous polyamine levels and somatic embrio maturation in white spruce (Picea glauca). Plan Sci 133: 211-220.
Lawyer, D.W. 1970. Absorbtion of polyethylene glycol by plant effect on plant growth. New Fisiol. 69:50-513
Levitt J. 1980. Responses of Plants of Environmental Stress: Water, Radiation and Other Stresses. Vol. 11. New York: Academic Press.
Michel, B.E dan M.R. Kaufman. 1973. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiol. 57:914-916.
Ragab, A.R., Abdel-Raheem, A.T., Kasem, Z.A., Omar, F.D. and Samera, A.M. 2007. Evaluation of R1 Tomatosomaclone Plants Selected under Poly Ethylene Glycol (PEG) Treatments. African Crop Science Society, 8, 2017-2025.
Sakthivelu, G., Devi, M.K.A., Giridhar, P., Rajasekaran, T., Ravishankar, G.A., Nedev, T. and Kosturkova, G. 2008. Drought-Induced Alterations in Growth, Osmotic Potential and in Vitro Regeneration of Soybean Cultivars. General and Applied Plant Physiology, 34, 103- 112.
Setiawan, Tohari, Dja’far Shiddieq. 2012. Pengaruh Cekaman Kekeringan Terhadap Akumulasi Prolin Tanaman Nilam (Pogostemon cablin Benth.). Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian 15 (2): 85 – 99.
Snyman, H.A. 1998. Dynamics and Sustainable Utilization of Rangeland Ecosystems in Arid and Semi-Aridclimates of South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments, 39, 645-666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jare.1998.0387
Supadi. 2009. Dampak Impor Kedelai Berkelanjutan Terhadap Ketahanan Pangan. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. Volume 7 No. 1. Maret 2009:87-102.
Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu JH, Zhu JK. 2006. Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J 45: 523–539
Waraich, E.A., Ahmad, R., Ashraf, M.Y. and Eh Saifullah. 2011. Role of Mineral Nutrition in Alleviation of Drought Stress in Plants. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5, 764-777.
Yunita, R. 2009. Pemanfaatan variasi somaklonal dan seleksi in vitro dalam perakitan tanaman toleran cekaman abiotik. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian 28(4):142-148.
Zakiah. 2011. Dampak Impor Terhadap Produksi Kedelai Nasional. Jurnal Agrisep. 12(1):76-85.
Zuyasna, Efendi, Chairunnas, dan Arwin. 2016. Efektivitas Polietlen Glikol Sebagai Bahan Penyeleksi Kedelai Kipas Merah Bireun yang Diradiasi Sinar Gamma Untuk Toleransi Terhadap Cekaman Kekeringan. Jurnal Floratek 11 (1)): 66-74
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17969/floratek.v12i2.9757
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN / E-ISSN: 1907-2686 / 2597-9108
Copyright © 2024 Departemen Agroteknologi
Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Syiah Kuala.