OVERCOMING DUALISM: THE IMPORTANCE OF CONSOLIDATING LAW AND REGULATION TESTING IN INDONESIA

Dodi Jaya Wardana

Abstract


This article highlights the significance of unifying the testing of all laws and regulations under the authority of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia. Currently, the testing of laws and regulations is divided between two state institutions, namely the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, resulting in dualism in the evaluation of laws and regulations. Through a normative-juridical approach, examining existing laws and theories, this article  reveals that the dualism of testing laws and regulations is a problem that needs to be addressed. The problem arises from the differences in decision outcomes between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court. The two institutions employ different benchmarks for material testing, with the Supreme Court relying on legislation and the Constitutional Court drawing on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The importance of unifying the testing of all laws and regulations lies in the fact that the unintegrated testing system causes confusion, creates institutional conflicts between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, and results in a lack of synchronization between laws and regulations from lowest to highest. Therefore, it is essential to conduct integrated testing of all laws and regulations, with the Constitutional Court serving as the authority responsible for this task. Notably, an increase in the number of Constitutional Court judges is necessary to achieve better development of laws and regulations testing in the future.


Keywords


Integrating; Testing of All Laws; The Authority; Constitutional Court, Indonesia.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin. “Model Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Satu Atap Melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY 25, no. 2 (July 14, 2018): 247–60. https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v25i2.6005.

Aris, Tenri Wulan. “Urgensi Judicial Review Satu Atap Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.” De Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 2 (July 25, 2020): 142–52. https://doi.org/10.33387/dejure.v1i2.1930.

Didin, Syafik. “Urgensi Penyatuan Kewenangan Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Oleh Lembaga Peradilan (Judicial Review) Di Indonesia.” Rechtidee 11, no. 2 (January 18, 2017): 208–25. https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v11i2.2159.

Dwi, Achmad, and Mulyanto. “Problematika Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Judicial Review) Pada Mahkamah Agung Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 1 (April 2, 2013): 57–65. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v2i1.11070.

Garoupa, Nuno. “Constitutional Review.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice, Volume 2, edited by Roger D. Congleton, Bernard Grofman, and Stefan Voigt, 133–55. Oxford University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190469771.013.7.

Hajri, Wira Atma, and Rahdiansyah Rahdiansyah. “Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia: Persoalan Dan Jalan Keluarnya.” UIR LAW REVIEW 2, no. 01 (April 16, 2018): 235–43. https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2018.2.01.1436.

Hamdi, Mirja Fauzul. “Reformulation of the Position of Auxiliary State Institutions as Legal Standing Related to Authority Disputes of State Institution.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 23, no. 1 (April 30, 2021): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i1.19869.

Helmi, Muhammad Ishar. “Penyelesaian Satu Atap Perkara Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-i 6, no. 1 (February 5, 2019): 97–112. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v6i1.10551.

Hidayat, Nanang Al, and Mela Sari. “Dualisme Judicial Review Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 7, no. 3 (October 1, 2018): 318–28. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2018.v07.i03.p04.

Hofi, Moh Ali. “Judicial Review Satu Atap Di Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Refleksi Terhadap Problematika Dan Tantangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia.” HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 2 (November 19, 2021): 221–34. https://doi.org/10.35316/hukmy.2021.v1i2.221-234.

Joko, Subri. “Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Mahkamah Agung Di Indonesia.” Universitas Islam Riau, 2019. https://repository.uir.ac.id/7913/.

Jun Mawalidin. “Konsistensi Konstitusi Indonesia Dalam Pelaksanaan Judicial Review Undang-Undang.” Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Dan Politik Islam 8, no. 1 (July 8, 2021): 43–63. https://doi.org/10.32505/politica.v8i1.3073.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum . Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group , 2013.

Masyithah, Sy, and Faisal A Rani. “Authority for the Development and Supervision of Regional Legal Products from Regional Autonomy Perspective.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 23, no. 2 (August 17, 2021): 275–94. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i2.21012.

Meidiana. “Integrasi Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 2 (March 24, 2020): 381–408. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.381-408.

MPR RI. Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Satu Atap Di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Edited by Biro Pengkajian. 1st ed. Jakarta: Badan Pengkajian MPR RI Bekerjasama dengan Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara-Hukum Administrasi Negara, 2017. https://www.scribd.com/document/632221785/250322-2017-Pengujian-Peraturan-Perundang-undangan-Satu-Atap-di-MK-pdf.

Putra, Antoni. “Dualis Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Legislasi Indonesia 15, no. 2 (2018): 69–79. https://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=949477&val=14663&title=DUALISME%20PENGUJIAN%20PERATURAN%20PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN.

RH, Priyambodo. “MK Siap Ambil Alih Wewenang MA Uji Aturan Di Bawah UU.” Antaranews.Com, May 29, 2007. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/64433/mk-siap-ambil-alih-wewenang-ma-uji-aturan-di-bawah-uu.

Rishan, Idul. “Konsep Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 1 (May 27, 2021): 001–021. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1811.

Riva’i, M. Muchtar, Uki Masduki, Berlianingsih Kusumawati, and Sulistyo Seti Utami. “Evaluasi Peraturan Walikota Tentang Penataan Ritel Modern Di Kota Tangerang Selatan Dengan Menggunakan Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA).” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 9, no. 1 (March 31, 2021): 95–111. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i1.818.

Satriawan, Muhammad Iwan, and Mukhlis Mukhlis. “Memurnikan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” SASI 24, no. 1 (July 8, 2018): 47–58. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v24i1.118.

Sirajuddin, and Winardi. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Tata Negara Di Indonesia. Malang: Setara Press, 2016.

Suparto, Suparto. “Problematika Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Mahkamah Agung ( Kajian Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 65 P/HUM/2018).” SASI 27, no. 1 (March 25, 2021): 61–72. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v27i1.417.

Syarif, Riswan Rais, Sultan Alwan, and Rudhi Achsoni. “Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 30/Puu-Xvi/2018 and Supreme Court Decision No. 65p/Hum/2018 Concerning the Prohibition of Concurrent Positions for Regional Representative Council Candidates (DPD.” Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist 7, no. 2 (2023): 44–50. https://jurnal-umbuton.ac.id/index.php/Volkgeist/article/view/3100.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v26i2.31400

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 31 times
PDF - 13 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
P-ISSN 0854-5499
E-ISSN 2527-8428
Published by Faculty of Law, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia