THE ENFORCEABILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTI-CORRUPTION LAWS IN REDUCING CORRUPTION CASES IN INDONESIA

Derry Angling Kesuma, Mohammed Nasir Uddin

Abstract


The role of the legal system, particularly through the Anti-Corruption Commission (KPK) and other law enforcement agencies in Indonesia, is pivotal in addressing high-profile corruption cases. However, these efforts have been impeded by factors such as political interference, resource limitations, and a lack of anti-corruption culture, posing challenges for the future. This article employs a normative legal research methodology, utilizing statutory and conceptual frameworks. Data collection involved a thorough literature review of relevant laws and regulations related to anti-corruption issues. In this context, the collaboration between the legal system and civil society emerges as a synergistic force in establishing a robust anti-corruption ecosystem. Emphasizing preventive measures like asset declarations and conflict-of-interest regulations offers valuable insights into the proactive role the legal system can assume in averting corruption before it spreads.


Keywords


Effectiveness, enforceability of anti-corruption laws, corruption cases Enforcement mechanisms, Indonesia.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ackerman, Susan Rose, and Bonnie J Palifka. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences and Reform. England: Cambridge University Pers, 2016.

Bintoro, Sutarno, and Johnson Ridwan Ginting. Profil Lembaga Antikorupsi Di Berbagai Negara: Dasar Hukum, Pembentukan, Kewenangan, Anggaran, SDM, Struktur Organisasi, Kantor Perwakilan, Gedung, Kontak Informasi. Jakarta: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK), 2014.

Danil, H. Elwi. Korupsi : Konsep, Tindak Pidana, Dan Pemberantasannya. 1st ed. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.

Dwiyanto, Agus, and Erwan Agus Purwanto. Reformasi Birokrasi, Kepemimpinan, Dan Pelayanan Publik : Kajian Tentang Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gava Media, 2009.

Ginting, Rosalina. “Dampak Reformasi Birokrasi Terhadap Kinerja Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah CIVIS 5, no. 1 (2015): 704–12. https://journal.upgris.ac.id/index.php/civis/article/view/631/581.

Hakim, Andi. “Dinamika Pelaksanaan Good Governance Di Indonesia (Dalam Perspektif Yuridis Dan Implementasi).” Civil Service 10, no. 1 (2016): 15–33. https://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=1481311&val=17805&title=DINAMIKA%20PELAKSANAAN%20GOOD%20GOVERNANCE%20DI%20INDONESIA%20DALAM%20PERSPEKTIF%20YURIDIS%20DAN%20IMPLEMENTASI.

Indonesian Goverment. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (2002). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/44493/uu-no-30-tahun-2002.

Isra, Saldi, Yuliandri, Feri Amsari, and Hilaire Tegnan. “Obstruction of Justice in the Effort to Eradicate Corruption in Indonesia.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 51 (December 2017): 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.07.001.

Karunia, Ana Aniza. “Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Teori Lawrence M. Friedman.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi 10, no. 1 (2022): 158–128. https://jurnal.unigo.ac.id/index.php/golrev/article/view/987/599.

Khoirunnisa, and Didi Jubaidi. “Criminal Liability For Justice Collaborators Involved In Corruption Crimes In Indonesia’.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 25, no. 3 (2023): 491–506. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v25i3.33822.

Kumorotomo, Wahyudi. Etika Administrasi Negara . Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 1992.

Liu, Ting-An-Xu, Wen-Jong Juang, and Chilik Yu. “Understanding Corruption with Perceived Corruption: The Understudied Effect of Corruption Tolerance.” Public Integrity 25, no. 2 (March 4, 2023): 207–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2029095.

Nicola, Alvin, and Wawan Suyatmiko. “Corruption Perceptions Index 2022.” Transparency International; Indonesia The Global Coalition Against Corruption, January 31, 2023. https://transparansi.id/corruption-perceptions-index-2022/.

Rae, Gradiso Nyoman Tio. Good Govenance Dan Pemberantasan Korupsi : Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Substantif. Edited by Atoek Koesmoeryantati. Jakarta: Sabbero Inti Persada, 2020.

Renaldy, Sam. “Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Sebagai Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia 1, no. 1 (October 9, 2020): 48–58. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v1i1.5.

Sulaiman. “Anti-Corruption Ideology In Higher Education In Indonesia.” Student Journal of International Law 1, no. 1 (2021): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24815/sjil.v1i1.18080.

Supriyanto, Supanto, and Hartiwiningsih. “Redefinisi Unsur ‘Yang Dapat Merugikan Keuangan (Perekonomian) Negara’ Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Amanna Gappa 25, no. 2 (2017): 7–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20956/ag.v25i2.2507.

Sutrisno, Fenty Puluhulawan, and Lusiana Margareth Tijow. “Penerapan Asas Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Putusan Hakim Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Gorontalo Law Review 3, no. 2 (2020): 168–87. https://jurnal.unigo.ac.id/index.php/golrev/article/view/987/599.

Syahuri, Taufiqurrohman, Gazalba Saleh, and Mayang Abrilianti. “The Role of the Corruption Eradication Commission Supervisory Board within the Indonesian Constitutional Structure.” Cogent Social Sciences 8, no. 1 (December 31, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2035913.

Tänzler, Dirk. “Cultures of Corruption, An Empirical Approach to the Understanding of Crime.” Discussion Paper Series No 2, 2007, 1–13. https://d-nb.info/1095781472/34.

Yustia, Dewi Asri, and Firdaus Arifin. “Bureaucratic Reform as an Effort to Prevent Corruption in Indonesia.” Cogent Social Sciences 9, no. 1 (December 31, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2166196.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v26i1.35600

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
P-ISSN 0854-5499
E-ISSN 2527-8428
Published by Faculty of Law, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia