Daily behavior and interaction of cats (Felis catus) with humans at a canteen in IPB University



Understanding feral cat behavior can be one of the aspects that is necessary for proper management and taking policy action in controlling the cat population. This study aimed to observe the daily activities of feral cats and see the correlation between the number of visitors on cat-to-human interaction at a canteen in IPB University. Observation of cat’s daily behavior was conducted by scan sampling method and cats’ interaction with humans was conducted by ad libitum sampling. Our results showed that self-care (66.27%) dominated the daily behavior of cats followed by negative behavior (20.83%) and affiliative behavior (12.9%). Correlation test showed there was a significant negative correlation between the number of visitors and frequency of affiliative behavior (p = 0.024). The number of visitors also shows a positive correlation to self-care (p = 0.034). No significant correlation between the number of visitors and negative encounters behavior (p = 0.27). The highest frequency value of cat-human interaction was approaching human (A) 28.15%, followed by vocalization (MV) 28.15% and eye contact (KM) 22.71%. Cat-human interaction behavior did not significantly correlate with the number of visitors (p >0.05). Our result implies that the feral cat’s use the canteen as a place to rest, not a place to find food and daily activities and human-cat interactions were specific for each study site. Therefore, in the management of feral cats, it was necessary to pay attention to the conditions of their respective habitats.


Behavior; Cat-Human; Feral Cat; Interaction


Lepczyk, C.A.; Dauphiné, N.; Bird, D.M.; Conant, S.; Cooper,R.J.; Duffy, D.C.; Hatley, P.J.; Marra, P.P.; Stone, E.; Temple, S.A. 2010. What conservation biologists can do regarding trap-neuter-return: response to Longcore et al. Con Bio. 24 627-629. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01426.x.

National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC). 2007. Animal welfare (companion cats) code of welfare. 2007. Auckland: New Zealand. New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.

Levy, J. K.; Crawford, C. 2004. Humane strategies for controlling feral cat populations. AVMA. 225 (9) 1354-1360. DOI: 10.2460/javma.2004.225.1354.

Kennedy, B.P.A.; Cumming, B.; Brown, W.Y. 2020. Global strategies for population management of domestic cats (Felis catus): A systematic review to inform best practice management for remote indigenous communities in Australia. Animals. 10 663. DOI: 10.3390/ani10040663.

Lepczyk, C.A.; Lohr, C.A.; Duffy, D.C. 2015. A review of cat behavior in relation to disease risk and management options. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 173 29-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.07.002.

Julianti, S.; Qomariah I,N.; Anshari, M.A;, Salimah, I.; Widayati, K.A. 2021. Aktivitas harian dan perilaku makan kucing domestik liar di lingkungan kantin IPB. Al-Kauniyah 14 (2) 244-253.DOI: 10.15408/kauniyah.v14i2.15730.

Altmann, J. 1974. Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour. 49(3). 227-267.

Stella, J.; Croney, C.; Buffington T. 2014. Environmental factors that affect the behaviour and welfare of domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) housed in cages. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 160 94-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.08.006.

Baumeister, R.F.; Leary M.R. 1995. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117 497–529. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.

Hofmann, W.; Vohs K.D.; Baumeister, R.F. 2012. What people desire, feel conflicted about, and try to resist in everyday life. Psychol. Sci. 23 (6) 582-588. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612437.

Waap, H.; Gomes, J.; Nunes,T. 2014. Parasite communities in stray cat populations from Lisbon, Portugal. J. Helminthol. 88 389–395. DOI: 10.1017/S0022149X1300031X.

Lozano, J.; Virgós, E.; Malo, A.F.; Huertas, D.L.; Casanovas, J. 2003. Importance of scrub-pastureland mosaics for wild-living cats occurrence in a Mediterranean area: implication for the conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris). Biodivers. Conserv. 12 921-935.DOI: 10.1023/A:1022821708594.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.24815/jn.v23i1.26515


  • There are currently no refbacks.