Analysis of Implementation and Optimization of Carbon Mitigation Mechanisms in Oil and Gas Industry Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Luthfiyah Revi Sukmasari*, Gunawan Nugroho

Abstract


Indonesia signed the Paris Agreement in 2016, thus actively contributing to tackling climate change has an obligation to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The main factor of global climate change is the increase of GHG, especially carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). PT X is committed to supporting Net Zero Emission 2060 by encouraging programs that have a good impact on the environment and Sustainable Development Goals (SDG's) 13 and supporting the government in handling the climate crisis. The ranking of alternatives is carried out using two structured methods, quantitative analysis using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), considering environmental, economic, and social aspects. used to help make decisions for the implementation of carbon mitigation mechanisms. From the observation of the previous implementation, carbon emissions in the production process were quite high. So it is necessary to make effective carbon mitigation efforts. There are three criteria that influence action decisions, namely environmental criteria, economic criteria and social criteria. The results of the weight value of each criterion are that the environment has the highest weight (0.61), followed by economic criteria (0.20) and social criteria (0.19) from these values indicate that environmental criteria are the most important criteria in decision making. The ranking results show that the Piston Modification Program and the Diesel Engine to Gas Engine Replacement Program are optimal options for short-term implementation. The Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) program should be considered for long-term investment, with the potential for large emission reductions and long-term cost savings.

Keywords


Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Sustainability, AHP, TOPSIS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alshamsi, A. M., El-Kassabi, H., Serhani, M. A., & Bouhaddioui, C. (2023). A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for data-driven distance learning recommendations. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 28, Issue 8). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11589-9

Bari, S., & Bari, S. (2019). Performance of a diesel engine run on diesel and natural gas in dual- fuel mode of on operation Performance of a diesel engine run and natural gas in dual- fuel mode of operation Assessing the feasibility of using. Energy Procedia, 160, 215–222.

Boyko, V., & Weber, J. (2024). Energy Efficiency of Pneumatic Actuating Systems with Pressure-Based Air Supply Cut-Off. Actuators, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/act13010044

Budinis, S., Krevor, S., Dowell, N. Mac, Brandon, N., & Hawkes, A. (2018). An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential. Energy Strategy Reviews, 22(May), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.003

Chauvy, R., Lepore, R., Fortemps, P., & De Weireld, G. (2020). Comparison of multi-criteria decision-analysis methods for selecting carbon dioxide utilization products. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 24, 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.002

Chen, T. L., Hsu, H. M., Pan, S. Y., & Chiang, P. C. (2019). Advances and challenges of implementing carbon offset mechanism for a low carbon economy: The Taiwanese experience. Journal of Cleaner Production, 239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117860

Dong, H., Fu, Y., Jia, Q., Zhang, T., & Meng, D. (2023). Low carbon optimization of integrated energy microgrid based on life cycle analysis method and multi time scale energy storage ☆. 206(November 2022), 60–71.

Elkadeem, M. R., Younes, A., Sharshir, S. W., Campana, P. E., & Wang, S. (2021). Sustainable siting and design optimization of hybrid renewable energy system: A geospatial multi-criteria analysis. Applied Energy, 295(February), 117071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117071

Emil Salim. (2018). MENGUKUR DAN REDUKSI GAS RUMAH KACA. http://perpustakaan.menlhk.go.id/pustaka/home/index.php?page=detail_news&newsid=474

Feng, T. tian, Li, R., Zhang, H. min, Gong, X. lei, & Yang, Y. sheng. (2021). Induction mechanism and optimization of tradable green certificates and carbon emission trading acting on electricity market in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 169(November 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105487

Hadidi, L. A., Aldosary, A. S., Al-Matar, A. K., & Mudallah, O. A. (2016). An optimization model to improve gas emission mitigation in oil refineries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 118, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.033

International Energy Agency. (2023). Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations in Net Zero Transitions. Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations in Net Zero Transitions. https://doi.org/10.1787/317cbf59-en

Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. (2022). Tekan Emisi Karbon, Indonesia Naikkan Target E-NDC Jadi 32 Persen. Migas.Esdm.Go.Id. https://migas.esdm.go.id/post/read/tekan-emisi-karbon-indonesia-naikkan-target-e-ndc-jadi-32-persen#:~:text=Jakarta%2C Indonesia berkomitmen mengurangi emisi,29%25 atau setara dengan 835

Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. (2024). Empat Strategi Mereduksi Emisi Karbon di Subsektor Migas. Direktorat Jendral Minyak Dan Gas Bumi.

Lambert, M., & Hassani, R. (2023). Diesel genset optimization in remote microgrids. Applied Energy, 340(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121036

Lau, H. C. (2022). Decarbonization roadmaps for ASEAN and their implications. Energy Reports, 8, 6000–6022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.04.047

Mehmood, K., Saifullah, Qiu, X., & Abrar, M. M. (2023). Unearthing research trends in emissions and sustainable development: Potential implications for future directions. Gondwana Research, 119, 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.02.009

Nasih, M., Harymawan, I., Paramitasari, Y. I., & Handayani, A. (2019). Carbon emissions, firm size, and corporate governance structure: Evidence from the mining and agricultural industries in Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092483

Nie, S., Cai, G., He, J., & Wang, S. (2023). Economic costs and environmental benefits of deploying CCUS supply chains at scale : Insights from the source – sink matching LCA – MILP approach. 344(March).

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2023). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 14 Tahun 2023 Tentang Perdagangan Karbon Melalui Bursa Karbon. Ojk.Go.Id.

Peraturan Menteri Energi Dan Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2021, Pub. L. No. 17, 1 (2021).

Prana, A., Hsieh, L. C., Abbas, S., Dermawan, D., & Kristianto, S. (2024). The inquiries for efficient decarbonization in the Indonesian upstream oil and gas field. 9(February).

Radhakrishnan Lawrence, K., Huang, Z., Nguyen, X. P., Balasubramanian, D., Gangula, V. R., Doddipalli, R. R., Le, V. V., Bharathy, S., & Hoang, A. T. (2022). Exploration over combined impacts of modified piston bowl geometry and tert-butyl hydroquinone additive-included biodiesel/diesel blend on diesel engine behaviors. Fuel, 322(December 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124206

Santoso, F. D. (2023). Carbon Capture Storage (CCS) Sebagai Pendorong Perekonomian Indonesia: Memanfaatkan Potensi untuk Masa Depan Hijau. https://www.pertamina.com/id/news-room/news-release/carbon-capture-storage-ccs-sebagai-pendorong-perekonomian-indonesia-memanfaatkan-potensi-untuk-masa-depan-hijau

Shires, T., Loughran, C., Jones, S., & Hopkins, E. (2009). Emissions Methodologies for the Compendium of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodologies for the. Compendium, August.

Sidemen, I. G. S. (2023). Indonesia Tabled CCS and CCUS in Net Zero Emission Road Map: Opening Possibilities for Cross-Border Carbon Trading/Storage.

Suryani, A. S. (2023). Peluncuran IDX Carbon di Indonesia. Info Singkat, 15(1), 16–20.

UNFCCC. (2022). ENHANCED NATIONALLY DETERMINED CONTRIBUTION REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA.

Wang, J. J., Jing, Y. Y., Zhang, C. F., & Zhao, J. H. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9), 2263–2278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021

Yang, L., Ji, S., Niu, W., Zare, A., Hunicz, J., & Brown, R. J. (2024). Effect of split injection strategy of diesel fuel on multi-stage heat release and performance of a RCCI engine fueled with diesel and natural gas. Fuel, 362(December 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.130930

Yin, Y., Mastalerz, M., Lennon, J. T., Drobniak, A., & Schimmelmann, A. (2020). Characterization and microbial mitigation of fugitive methane emissions from oil and gas wells: Example from Indiana, USA. Applied Geochemistry, 118(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2020.104619

Yu, H., & Solvang, W. D. (2017). A carbon-constrained stochastic optimization model with augmented multi-criteria scenario-based risk-averse solution for reverse logistics network design under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1248–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.066




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v7i3.39124

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Riwayat: Educational of History and Humanities indexed by

sinta_logodoaj_logoDimensions_logoCROSSREF_logoROAD_logoPKP_Index_logoGoogle_Scholar_logogaruda_logoonesearch_logoBASE_logoWordcat_logo

___________________________________________________________
Riwayat: Educational of History and Humanities

E-ISSN 2775-5037
P-ISSN 2614-3917

Published by History Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Province Aceh. Indonesia
W :https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/riwayat
E : riwayat@usk.ac.id

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.