Sustainability Accounting Practices in Social Enterprises in the Era of Circular Economy
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, C. A., Alhamood, A. M., & He, X. (2022). The development and implementation of GRI standards: practice and policy issues. In Handbook of accounting and sustainability (pp. 26–43). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Allsop, D. B., Chelladurai, J. M., Kimball, E. R., Marks, L. D., & Hendricks, J. J. (2022). Qualitative methods with Nvivo software: A practical guide for analyzing qualitative data. Psych, 4(2), 142–159.
Angotti, M., Ferreira, A. C. de S., Eugénio, T., & Branco, M. C. (2024). A narrative approach for reporting social and environmental accounting impacts in the mining sector–giving marginalized communities a voice. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(1), 42–63.
Aranda-Usón, A., Scarpellini, S., & Moneva, J. M. (2024). Dynamic capabilities for a" circular accounting" and material flows in a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 209, 107756.
Aureli, S., Foschi, E., & Paletta, A. (2025). Management accounting for a circular economy: current limits and avenue for a dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 38(9), 291–319.
Awan, U., & Sroufe, R. (2022). Sustainability in the circular economy: insights and dynamics of designing circular business models. Applied Sciences, 12(3), 1521.
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412.
Engez, A., Leminen, S., & Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2021). Urban living lab as a circular economy ecosystem: Advancing environmental sustainability through economic value, material, and knowledge flows. Sustainability, 13(5), 2811.
Gunbayi, I. (2024). Rigor in qualitative research. Journal of Action Qualitative & Mixed Methods Research (JAQMER), 3(2).
Ika, S. R., Nugroho, J. P., Achmad, N., & Widagdo, A. K. (2021). The impact of corporate governance on environmental reporting: Evidence from the Indonesian manufacturing industry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 739(1), 12030.
John, C. K., Ajibade, F. O., Ajibade, T. F., Kumar, P., Adelodun, B., Fadugba, O. G., Adewumi, J. R., & Akinbile, C. O. (2025). The Sustainability Shift: Addressing Environmental Degradation Through Circular Practices. In Circular Economy and Environmental Resilience: Solutions for a Sustainable Tomorrow, Volume 1 (pp. 167–203). Springer.
Kekeya, J. (2021). Qualitative case study research design: The commonalities and differences between collective, intrinsic and instrumental case studies. Contemporary PNG Studies, 36, 28–37.
Michalke, A., Kunz, J., & Gaugler, T. (2025). True Cost Accounting: Assessing Environmental and Social Damages of Production. Taylor & Francis.
O’Reilly, S., Mac An Bhaird, C., Gorman, L., & Brennan, N. M. (2025). Accounting practitioners’ perspectives on small-and medium-sized enterprises’ environmental sustainability reporting. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 26(6), 26–46.
Qian, W., Tilt, C., & Belal, A. (2021). Social and environmental accounting in developing countries: contextual challenges and insights. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(5), 1021–1050.
Reynolds, M. (2025). Measuring the Circular Economy:(de) coupling during strategic organisational transitions.
Scarpellini, S. (2022). Social impacts of a circular business model: An approach from a sustainability accounting and reporting perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(3), 646–656.
Sheehan, M., Garavan, T. N., & Morley, M. J. (2023). The microfoundations of dynamic capabilities for incremental and radical innovation in knowledge‐intensive businesses. British Journal of Management, 34(1), 220–240.
Supriadi, I., Maghfiroh, R. U., & Abadi, R. (2025). Circular Accounting and Regenerative Business Models: How Environmental Foresight Drives SME Competitive Advantage Through Dynamic Capabilities. Jurnal Inovasi Akuntansi (JIA), 3(1), 38–47.
Valentinov, V., & Hajdu, A. (2021). Integrating instrumental and normative stakeholder theories: a systems theory approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(4), 699–712.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v8i4.49230
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 149 timesPDF - 55 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
__________________________________________________________
Riwayat: Educatioanl Journal of History and Humanities
Published: Departemen of History Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Provinsi Aceh. Indonesia
Situs web: https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/riwayat
Email: riwayat@usk.ac.id

Karya ini dilisensikan di bawah Lisensi Internasional Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0.
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities