Dynamics of the Development of Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for Contemporary Management Theory

Risky Irawan

Abstract


The development of science in the 21st century has undergone significant transformations not only in the empirical and technical domains but also in conceptual and philosophical dimensions. Philosophy of science—concerned with ontology, epistemology, and axiology—has experienced dynamic shifts shaped by globalization, digitalization, and technological acceleration. These developments have had strong implications for contemporary management theory, which must address increasing complexity, ambiguity, and ethical challenges. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of philosophy of science in the last decade and their influence on management theory, with particular attention to leadership, innovation, ethics, and sustainability. Using a qualitative literature study, the research draws upon scholarly articles, books, and conference papers to construct a conceptual framework. Findings indicate four major transformations: (1) ontology has moved from positivist and mechanistic views toward complexity and context-dependence; (2) epistemology has shifted to pluralism, acknowledging the legitimacy of multiple methods; (3) axiology has increasingly emphasized value-laden inquiry, recognizing the ethical and social dimensions of scientific practice; and (4) technological advancement, particularly in artificial intelligence and data-driven systems, has challenged conventional standards of knowledge, fairness, and accountability. These philosophical shifts demand that management theory evolve into a more adaptive, value-sensitive, and contextually grounded practice. Practical illustrations, including responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and algorithmic bias in recruitment, demonstrate how philosophy of science can enrich management’s responsiveness to global and local challenges. Ultimately, this study highlights the importance of philosophical literacy in sustaining management theory’s relevance in contemporary contexts.


Keywords


Philosophy of Science, Management Theory, Epistemic Pluralism.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ares Faujian, Touheed Ahmed, Shahzeb Shahzeb, & Sudrajat Sudrajat. (2024). The relationship between the philosophy of science and technology in the development of Indonesian society. Jurnal Ilmiah WUNY, 7(1).

Blackburn, S. (2019). Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.

Cahyono, H., Iskandar, I., Setyawati, E., & Pahrudin, A. (2024). History and Study of Philosophy of Science in the Development of Value-Based Management Islamic Education. JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan), 9(1), 197-210.

Chen, Z., et al. (2023). Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dastin, J. (2018, October 10). Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. Available via Google Scholar and news archives.

Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.

Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press. (Seminal treatment of values in science.)

Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.

Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106–116.

Elliott, K., & Korf, N. (2024). Values in science: What are values anyway? European Journal for Philosophy of Science (preprint).

Emerald Insight. (2023). Philosophy of science and research paradigm for business research in the transformative age of automation, digitalization, hyperconnectivity, obligations, globalization and sustainability. Emerald Insight.

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines / related works; see also Floridi’s Google Scholar profile.

Frederiksen, D. J., & Kringelum, L. B. (2021). Five potentials of critical realism in management and organization studies. Journal of Critical Realism, 20(1), 18–38.

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Lohse, S., et al. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: a case for epistemic pluralism in evidence-based public health. BMJ Global Health / PubMed Central.

Lohse, S., et al. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: a case for epistemic pluralism in evidence-based public health policy. BMJ Global Health.

Manurung, G., & Hendayana, Y. (2023). The Future of Management Theory: A Review of the Literature on Innovation, Sustainability, and Transformative Leadership. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 6(5).

Mingers, J. (2014). The contribution of critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for OR/MS and systems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(11), 1256–1269.

Nabila, N. M. M., & Mansur, A. (2025). Development Of Philosophy And Science, Understanding The Philosophy Of Science, And Directions Of The Philosophy Of Science. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Studies (IJIS), 1(1), 14-22.

Nagel, T. (2020). What Does It All Mean? A Very Short Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.

Ningsih, S., Yusnandar, W., Sipahutar, M. A., & Mujiatun, S. (2024). Development of Philosophy of Science in Management in The Digital Era. Jurnal Ekonomi, Se-Institut.

Raghavan, M., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2020). Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: evaluating claims and practices. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM), arXiv:1906.09208.

Raghavan, M., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2020). Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: evaluating claims and practices. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT*).

Raghavan, M., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2020). Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: Evaluating claims and practices. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372828

Rolin, K. (2015). Values in science: The case of scientific collaboration. Philosophy of Science, 82(5), 1234–1245.

Serino, M., et al. (2024). Mapping epistemic pluralism: a network analysis of marginalized knowledge. Social Networks (2024).

Setiawan, R. A., & Sauri, S. (2024). The Role of Philosophy of Science in the Development of Science. al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 7(4).

Smith, N. (2022). Philosophy: The Basics. Routledge.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318.

Wati, R. (2024). Analyzing and Viewing the Development of Construction of the Philosophical View of Positivism. Journal of World Science, 3(8), 906–913.

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971

Zangwill, N. (2020). Epistemic pluralism. Metaphilosophy, 51(3), 400–415.

Zangwill, N. (2020). Epistemic pluralism. Metaphilosophy, 51(3), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12409

Zangwill, N. (2020). Epistemic pluralism. Metaphilosophy. (Defends pluralist approaches to knowledge.)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v8i4.49500

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 54 times
PDF - 36 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

__________________________________________________________

Riwayat: Educatioanl Journal of History and Humanities


Published: Departemen of History Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Provinsi Aceh. Indonesia

Situs web: https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/riwayat
Email: riwayat@usk.ac.id

Lisensi Creative Commons
Karya ini dilisensikan di bawah Lisensi Internasional Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0.