Intake and growth performance of Brahman and Boran crossbred heifers fed on optimized ash-based vitamin-mineral winter block with bentonitic clay binders
Abstract
Though use of cement as a binder has produced acceptable results in the manufacture of feed block, there are questions on the possible negative health effects and high cost associated with the use of building cement in the production of feed blocks. The objective of the study was to compare supplementation effect of cement and bentonite + cement as binders in optimised ash-based winter blocks on feed intake, weekly weight gain and hair characteristics of beef cattle. Sixteen Brahman x Boran crossbred heifers with initial body weight of 250 ± 5kg were allocated to four treatments in a completely randomized design. Treatments based on the binder used in fabricating the optimized ash-based vitamin-mineral winter block were: cement agglutinated block, bentonite + cement agglutinated block, negative control (no supplement), and positive control (commercially available winter block). Animals were penned and fed on Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) hay constituting 11% crude protein (CP); 8 MJ/kg DM for seventy days (dry season). Feed and supplement blocks were weighed daily animal weights were collected on weekly basis. Hair samples were measured at the beginning and end of the experiment. There was no significant difference in voluntary feed intake between bentonite + cement block and the positive control (P<0.05). Block intake was significantly higher (P<0.05) for the commercially available block (0.70±0.05kg/head/day) than in the cement agglutinated block (0.44±0.04 kg/head/day) and the bentonite + cement agglutinated block (0.49±0.04 kg/head/day). All animals that received supplement block had significantly higher weight gains than those that did not receive supplement (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hair length across all treatments (P<0.05). Ash-based winter block agglutinated by a combination of cement and bentonite clay is a viable supplement which helps trim down amount of cement in feed blocks and improve animal performance. Use of the locally produced optimised ash-based vitamin-mineral block for nourishing ruminant animals is highly recommended.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahuja, A., D. Parmar. 2017. Role of minerals in reproductive health of dairy cattle: A review. International Journal of Livestock Research, 1. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20170806042724
Arthington, J.D. 2006. Trace mineral nutrition and immune competence in Cattle. 2003.
Asaolu, V.O. 2012. Development of moringa multi-nutrient block as a dry season feed supplement for ruminants. In Livestock Research for Rural Development, 24(3).
Ben Salem, H., T. Smith. 2008. Feeding strategies to increase small ruminant production in dry environments. Small Ruminant Research, 77(2–3): 174–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.03.008
Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G., M. Abo-Ismail, G.E. Carstens, L.L. Guan, R. Hegarty, D.A. Kenny, M. Mcgee, G. Plastow, A. Relling, I. Ortigues-Marty. 2018. Review: Biological determinants of between-animal variation in feed efficiency of growing beef cattle. Animal, 12(2): S321–S335. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001489
Dove, H. 2009. Feed supplementation blocks. Urea-molasses multi-nutrient blocks: simple and effective feed supplement technology for ruminant agriculture. Grass and Forage Science, 64(1): 106–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2008.00673.x
Furtado, D.A., T.B.d.S. Castro, J.P. Lopes Neto, R.A. Constantino, M.D.G.G. Cunha, J.W.B. do Nascimento. 2018. Physical-mechanical properties of multinutrient blocks with different binders for goats and sheep intake. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental, 22(8), 558–563. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n8p558-563
Gasselin, M., M. Boutinaud, A. Prézelin, P. Debournoux, M. Fargetton, E. Mariani, J. Zawadzki, H. Kiefer, H Jammes. 2020. Effects of micronutrient supplementation on performance and epigenetic status in dairy cows. Animal, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731120001159
Gusha, J., T. Chiuta, S. Katsande, P.I. Zvinorova, S.M. Kagande. 2017. Performance of cattle reared on rangelands supplemented with farm-formulated diets during the dry season in Zimbabwe. 1163–1169.
Kikelomo, A.M. 2016. Preliminary physico-chemical investigation of local binding agents in mineral salt licks production for ruminants. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 1(4), 997–1003. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/1.4.52
Madzimure, J., M. Chimonyo, K.K. Zander, K. Dzama. 2012. Diurnal heat-related physiological and behavioural responses in South African indigenous gilts. Journal of Arid Environments, 87, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.05.010
Mondal, T., M. Gupta, B. Parthasarathi, A. Khatti, S. Singh, S. Choudhary. 2018. Transition stress in dairy cattle-role of energy balance and micronutrients. International Journal of Livestock Research, 8(5): 1. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20171211022928
Mubi, A.A., I.D. Mohammed, A. Kibon. 2012. Effects of multinutrient blocks supplementation on the performance of cattle grazing natural pastures in the Wet Season of Guinea Savanna Region of Nigeria, 8(1): 33–37.
Salman, A.D., K.M. El Shargi, R.S. Al-Habsi, T. Al-Sadairi. 2017. New development of feed blocks technology in the Sultanate of Oman. In Livestock Research for Rural Development, 29(6).
Sansoucy, R., G. Aarts, T.R. Preston. 1988. Molasses-urea blocks as a multinutrient supplement for ruminants. In Sugarcane as Feed, Proc. of an FAO Experts consultation held in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, 7–11.
Wangchuk, K., J. Wangdi, M. Mindu. 2018. Comparison and reliability of techniques to estimate live cattle body weight. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 349–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1302876
Żarczyńska, K., P. Żarczyński, P. Sobiech, A. Snarska, A. Stopyra, M. Wieteska, A. Płaczek. 2017. The effect of micronutrient deficiencies on the health status of transition cows. Journal of Elementology, 22(4): 1223–1234. https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2017.22.2.1447
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13170/ajas.7.1.21227
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
DETAIL VISITORS STATISTIC COUNTER CLICK HERE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - 4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).