Hide
Show all
Email this article 
Development of Minimum Competency Assessment (MCA)-Like Mathematics Problems Using Financial Context in Algebra
Abstract
The asesmen kemampuan minimum or Minimum Competency Assessment (MCA) is a new form of assessment in Indonesia implemented in several schools since 2021. Implementing MCA aims to prepare students for the skills needed in the 21st century. However, the availability of MCA-type mathematics problems is still limited for learning in printed books and online-based media. This research aims to produce MCA-like mathematics problems using financial contexts in algebra that are valid, practical, and effective. This research employed a development study consisting of six stages: preliminary, self-evaluation, expert reviews, one-to-one, small group, and field test stages. The test subjects were 85 students of grade 11 in one vocational high school in Sigli, Aceh, Indonesia. The research instruments were a validation sheet, an interview sheet, and a practicality and effectiveness test questionnaire. This research has produced 21 MCA-type items with a financial context in algebra that is valid, practical, and effective. Therefore, the generated mathematics problems can be used by teachers to improve students' numeracy and financial literacy skills.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustyaningrum, N., & Gusmania, Y. (2017). Praktikalitas dan keefektifan modul geometri analitik ruang berbasis konstruktivisme. Jurnal Dimensi, 6(3), 412-420. https://doi.org/10.33373/dms.v6i3.1075
Aisah, H., Zaqiah, Q. Y., & Supiana, A. (2021). Implementasi kebijakan asesmen kemampuan minimum (AKM): Analisis implementasi kebijakan AKM. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Al- Affan, 1(2), 128–135. http://ejournal.stit-alquraniyah.ac.id/index.php/jpia/
Bangsawan, I. P. R. (2018). Minat baca siswa. Dinas Pendidikan, Pemuda, Olahraga, dan Pariwisata Kabupaten Banyuasin.
Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2019). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson.
Colwell, J., & Enderson, M. C. (2016). When I hear literacy: Using pre-service teachers’ perceptions of mathematical literacy to inform program changes in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.001
De Lange, J. (2003). Mathematics for Literacy. Quantitative Literacy: Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges, 80, 75–89.
Fauzan, A. (2002). Applying realistic mathematics education (RME) in teaching geometry in Indonesian primary schools. [Thesis]. University of Twente.
Fauziah, A., Sobari, E. F. D., & Robandi, B. (2021). Analisis pemahaman guru sekolah menengah pertama (SMP) mengenai asesmen kompetensi minimum (AKM). Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(4), 1550–1558. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i4.608
Foundation for Young Australians. (2016). The new basics: Big data reveals the skills young people need for the New Work order FYA’s New Work order report series.
G 20. (2012). G20 leaders’ declaration.
Green, D. A., & Riddell, W. C. (2001). Literacy, numeracy and labour market outcomes in
Canada, 89-552. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin press.
Haji, S., Yumiati, Y., & Zamzaili, Z. (2018). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyesaikan soal- soal PISA (programme for international student assessment) di SMP kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 3(2), 177–183.
Hazudin, S. F., Tarmuji, N. H., Kader, M. A. R. A., Majid, A. A., Aziz, N. N. A., & Ishak, M. (2018). The relationship between previous mathematics performance, and level of financial literacy and financial well-being of university students. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5041701
Kadir, L., & Masi, L. (2014). Mathematical creative thinking skills of students’ junior high school in Kendari City. In International Seminar on Innovation in Mathematics and Mathematics Education 1st ISIMMED, 26–30.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Merdeka belajar episode 22: Transformasi seleksi masuk perguruan tinggi negeri.
Kurniawan, A. P., Budiarto, M. T., & Ekawati, R. (2022). pengembangan soal numerasi berbasis konteks nilai budaya Primbon Jawa. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 7(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2022.7.1.20-34
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology/Berrett- Koehler Publishers.
Lewy, L., Zulkardi, Z., & Aisyah, N. (2009). Pengembangan soal untuk mengukur kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi pokok bahasan barisan dan deret bilangan di kelas IX akselerasi SMP Xaverius Maria Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 14–23.
Loevinger, J. (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3(3), 635–694. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1957.3.3.635
Lusardi, A. (2015). Financial literacy skills for the 21st century: Evidence from PISA. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 49(3), 639–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12099
Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The Economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5
Madison, B., & Steen, L. (2008). Evolution of numeracy and the national numeracy network. Numeracy, 1(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.1.1.2
Mawaddah, S., Noorbaiti, R., Aulia, M., Eryanto, A. N. E., & Mahlina, O. (2022). Instrumen asesmen kompetensi minimum numerasi konteks lingkungan lahan basah khas Kalimantan Selatan. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v10i1.12062
Muzaki, A. (2019). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis siswa. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3), 493-502. http://journal.institutpendidikan.ac.id/index.php/mosharafa
NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.
Ningsih, D. C., & Susanta, A. (2022). Kajian soal-soal dalam buku teks matematika kelas V berdasarkan frameworks PISA. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 6(3), 799–814. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v6i3.658
Niss. (1996). Chapter 1: Goals of mathematics teaching MOGENSNISS.
Novita, R., & Hartono, Y. (2012). Exploring primary student’s problem-solving ability by doing tasks like PISA’s question. Indonesian Mathematical Society Journal on Mathematics Education, 3(2), 133–150.
OECD. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life first results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world first results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world volume 1 – analysis. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What students know and can do. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264091450-en
OECD. (2012). Better policies for better lives. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and analytical framework. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en
OECD. (2015). OECD guidelines on corporate governance of state-owned enterprises, 2015 Edition. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264244160-en
OECD. (2016a). Education at a glance 2016. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2016-en
OECD. (2016b). PISA 2015 results (Vol. I). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 results (Vol. I). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Vol. I). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Ozkale, A., & Ozdemir E, E. (2022). An analysis of the interaction between mathematical literacy and financial literacy in PISA. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(8), 1983–2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1842526
Purwanto, A. J. (2021). Pemahaman siswa kelas XI SMK Negeri 1 Pujer dalam menyelesaikan soal AKM numerasi. Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning, 1(2), 109-115.
Purwitaningrum, R., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2021). Developing instructional materials on mathematics logical thinking through the Indonesian realistic mathematics education approach. International Journal of Education and Learning, 3(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v3i1.178
Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran. (2020). AKM dan implementasinya pada pembelajaran. Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran, Badan Penelitian, Pengembangan dan Perbukuan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/19690/1/file_akm2.pdf
Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran. (2021). Framework asesmen kompetensi minimum. Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran, Badan Penelitian, Pengembangan dan Perbukuan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan. (2022). Asesmen kompetensi minimum. https://pusmenjar.kemdikbud.go.id/an/page/asesmen_kompetensi_minimum
Robbins, S. P., & Udaya, J. (1994). Teori organisasi: Struktur, desain, dan aplikasi. PT. Prenhallindo.
Savard, A., & Cavalcante, A. (2021). Financial numeracy as part of mathematics education. Financial Numeracy in Mathematics Education: Research and Practice.
Septian, A., Komala, E., & Komara, K. A. (2019). Pembelajaran dengan model creative problem solving (CPS) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa. PRISMA, 8(2), 182-190. https://jurnal.unsur.ac.id/prisma
Sole, M. A. (2017). Financial education: Increase your purchasing power. The Mathematics Teacher, 111(1), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.111.1.0060
Stacey, K. (2010). Mathematical and scientific literacy around the world. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(1), 1–16.
Susanti, S., & Maulina, I. (2024). Peningkatan kemampuan literasi dan numerasi serta minat baca anak melalui pojok baca pada anak kelompok B di Tk Aletheia Pontianak. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bangsa, 2(5), 1674–1679. https://doi.org/10.59837/jpmba.v2i5.1089
Syaifuddin, M., Rahmah, K., Sah, R. W. A., & Fauza, M. R. (2022). Development of The AKM test with javanese cultural context to measure numeracy literacy skills in statistical materials for high school student. Wacana Akademika: Majalah Ilmiah Kependidikan, 6(3), 245-254.
Tandililing, E. (2010). Implementasi rRealistic mathematics education (RME) di sekolah. Guru Membangun, 25(3).
Tessmer, M. (2013). Planning and conducting formative evaluations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203061978
van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research.
van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2005). The role of contexts in assessment problems in
mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(2), 2–23.
Yusrizal. (2016). Pengukuran dan evaluasi hasil belajar dan proses belajar. Pale Media Prima.
Zulkardi, Z. (2002). Developing a learning environment on realistic mathematics education for Indonesian student teachers [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Twente.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v11i2.34377
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Zuhrawati, Anwar, Cut Morina Zubainur, Mohd Isha Awang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Didaktik Matematika
ISSN 2355–4185 (print) | 2548–8546 (online)
Published by:
Universitas Syiah Kuala incorporated with the Indonesian Mathematics Educators Society (I-MES)
Mathematics Education Department Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia - 23111
Website : http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/DM/
Email : jurnal.jdm@usk.ac.id
Jurnal Didaktik Matematika by Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.