1. Home
  2. Vol 12, No 1 (2025)
  3. Harisman

Assessing Middle School Students' Grasp of Definitions and Postulates in Euclid's Elements Volume I

Yulyanti Harisman, Cindy Eka Selvia, Hamdani Syaputra

Abstract


Many junior high school students lack exposure to the fundamental definitions and postulates of Euclid's Elements, leading to gaps in their understanding of basic geometric concepts. This research addresses the need to assess students' comprehension levels of Euclid's Elements in mathematics education. This research is qualitative and uses case study methods. The case study was conducted on eight junior high school students(six females and two males), from Padang, Indonesia. The instruments used in this research were open interviews and written tests related to the definition and postulates of Euclid's Elements Volume I. The data analysis was analyzed using Categorization Analysis (Content Analysis). The results assess the extent of junior high school students' knowledge and understanding of the definitions and postulates in Euclid's Elements Volume I. The findings of this research highlight the need to strengthen the teaching of Euclid’s definitions and postulates in junior high school curricula to improve students' understanding of basic geometric concepts. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of historical mathematical texts in education and suggests further studies on effective instructional methods to enhance students' comprehension and reasoning skills.

Keywords


definitions, Euclid's elements, geometry, postulates, volume I

References


Ackerberg-Hastings, A. (2022). Analysis and synthesis in Robert Simson's The Elements of euclid. In Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics: The CSHPM 2021, 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21494-3_8

Akhsani, L., Rochmad, R., & Isnarto, I. (2022). Euclid sebagai tokoh aliran humanis dalam perkembangan filsafat dan pembelajaran Matematika. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 5, 158–161. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/

Andamon, J. C., & Tan, D. A. (2018). Conceptual understanding, attitude and performance in mathematics of Grade 7 Students. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 7(8), 96-105.

Banionis, J. (2021). Euclid’s elements publication in vilnius. Lietuvos Matematikos Rinkinys, 47, 304-306. https://doi.org/10.15388/lmr.2007.24219

Bo, Á. J. C. (2023). The forgotten gifts of hermes: The latin reception of proclus’ commentary on euclid’s elements. Mediterranea, International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge, 8, 193-278. https://doi.org/10.21071/mijtk.v8i.15193

Corry, L. (2021). Distributivity-like results in euclid’s elements. In Distributivity-like Results in the Medieval Traditions of Euclid's Elements: Between Geometry and Arithmetic, 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79679-2_2

De Risi, V. (2021b). Gapless lines and gapless proofs: Intersections and continuity in euclid’s elements. Apeiron, 54(2), 233-259. https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2019-0012

De Risi, V. (2022). Euclid’s fourth postulate: Its authenticity and significance for the foundations of Greek mathematics. Science in Context, 35(1), 49-80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889723000145

Desita, R. K. (2021). Taxonomi bloom, peta konsep dalam evaluasi pembelajaran. Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo.

Evers, N. S. (2021). Lewis Carroll’s defense of euclid: Parallels or contrariwise. In Handbook of the Mathematics of the Arts and Sciences, 1093-1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57072-3_128

Fathoni, A. (2006). Metodologi penelitian dan teknik penyusunan skripsi. Rineka Cipta.

Gerace, W. J., Dufresne, R. J., Leonard, W. J., & Mestre, J. P. (2001). Problem solving and conceptual understanding. In Proceedings of the 2001 Physics education research conference, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2001.inv.005

Gunawan, I., Darhim, D., & Kusnandi, K. (2019). Exploration of the behavior of understanding mathematical concepts of junior high school students. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 042098. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042098

Jenkins, A. (2021). Non-normative euclideans: Victorian literature and the untaught geometer. In The Palgrave Handbook of Literature and Mathematics, 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55478-1_5

Kourniatis, N. (2020). From euclid to the age of the image. Design/Arts/Culture, 1, 42-52. https://doi.org/10.12681/dac.25909

Laskowska, A. M. (2021). The euclidean “division of the canon” and pythagorean harmonics. Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal, 11(2), 509-524. https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.11.2.10

Marsigit. (2012). Sejarah dan filsafat matematika. Scribd. Https://Www.Scribd.Com/Document/733112366/Marsigit-Sejarah-Dan-Filsafat-Matematika.

Mcleod, S. (2023). Jerome Bruner’s constructivist theory of learning and cognitive development. Simply Psychlogy.

Melisa. (2020). Siapa bilang mengajar matematika sulit. Guepedia. www.guepedia.com.

Muir, T., Beswick, K., & Williamson, J. (2008). “I’m not very good at solving problems”: An exploration of students’ problem solving behaviours. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(3), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2008.04.003

Nugraheni, N. (2021). Aliran humanis dalam filsafat matematika. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 4(3), 393-396.

Nur’aini, I. L., Harahap, E., Badruzzaman, F. H., & Darmawan, D. (2017). Pembelajaran matematika geometri secara realistis dengan geogebra. Matematika: Jurnal Teori dan Terapan Matematika, 16(2), 1-6.

Rohati, R., Kusumah, Y. S., & Kusnandi, K. (2022). The development of analytical rubrics: An avenue to assess students’ mathematical reasoning behavior. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(8), 2553–2566. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i8.7043

Shabel, L. A. (2020). Euclid: The role of the euclidean diagram in the elements. In Mathematics in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203953761-2

Sitasari, N. W. (2022). Mengenal analisa konten dan analisa tematik dalam penelitian kualitatif. In Forum Ilmiah Indonusa, 19(1), 77-84. https://digilib.esaunggul.ac.id/public/UEU-Journal-23188-11_2248.pdf

Surata, I. K., Sudiana, I. M., & Sudirgayasa, I. G. (2020). Meta-analisis media pembelajaran pada pembelajaran biologi I Ketut Surata I Made Sudiana I Gede Sudirgayasa. Journal of Education Technology, 4(1), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v4i1.24079

Vollmeyer, R., Burns, B. D., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). The impact of goal specificity on strategy use and the acquisition of problem structure. Cognitive Science, 20(1), 75-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80003-2

Vygotsky, L. S. (2011). Interaction between learning and development. Linköpings universitet.

Wahidmurni. (2017). Pemaparan metode penelitian kualitatif. 1–17. http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/1984/

Wilck, B. (2020). Euclid’s kinds and (their) attributes. History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis, 23(2), 362-397. https://doi.org/10.30965/26664275-02302005


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.24815/jdm.v12i1.36125

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Yulyanti Harisman, Cindy Eka Selvia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.