Board Features and Timely Disclosure of Audited Accounts of Listed Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria

Luka Mailafia, Jibril Adamu

Abstract


Objective–This study examines the moderating effect of company age on the relationship between board features on timely disclosure of audited financial statements. Specifically it tests the effects of board size, proportionate audit committee size, board independence on timely disclosure of the banks under study; and assess the influence of age as a moderator of board size, proportionate audit committee size, and board independence respectively as they affect timely disclosure of the listed deposit money banks in Nigeria.

 

Design/methodology–The sample of 10 banks out of 15 listed deposit money banks in Nigeria were used. Secondary data was gathered from the sampled banks’ annual accounts and reports. Correlational research design was used to examine the relationship between the studied variables. Descriptive statistics, correlation, and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were eventually carried.

 

Results –This study finds that board size and proportionate audit committee size are negatively related to timely disclosure of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria with the later exerting significant effect on the dependent variable. Furthermore, company age moderates both corporate governance and timely disclosure. Therefore, this study recommends that companies should strategize ways to improve corporate governance practice in order to inspire confidence on investors by timely disclosure of the financial report.

 

Contribution – The study has been able to provide evidence on age as a moderator to some corporate governance determinants of timeliness disclosure peculiar to Nigerian Deposit Money Banks. It has also addressed the measurement issue regarding audit committee size, introduced a new term known as ‘proportionate audit committee size’ as a variable.


Keywords


Timeliness Disclosure; Board Features; Proportionate Audit Committee Size

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams, R. (2012). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework & survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107.

Afify, H. A. E. (2009). Determinants of audit report lag: Does implementation of corporate governance have any impact? Applied Accounting Research, 10(1), 56–86.

Ahmed, M. I., & Che-Ahmad, A. (2016). Effects of corporate governance characteristics on audit report lags Special Issue for "International Soft Science Conference (ISSC 2016), 11-13 April 2016, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia”; ISSN: 2146-4138 available at http: www.econjournals.com. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(7), 159–164. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311387556_Effects_of_Corporate_Governance_Characteristics_on_Audit_Report_Lags

Al-Matari, Y. A., Al-Swidi, A. K., & Al-Matari, E. M. (2012). Board of directors, audit committee characteristics and performance of saudi arabia listed companies. International Review of Management and Marketing,2(4), 241–251. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ3/2012-03-5.html

Azubike, J. U., & Aggreg, B. (2014). Corporate governance and audit delay in Nigerian quoted companies. European Journal of Accounting and Finance Research, 2(10), 22–33.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

Dehkordi, H. Y., & Makerem, G. J. (2011). Determinants of audit report lag: Evidence from Korea-an examination of auditor-related factors. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 24(2), 27–44.

Dimitropoulos, P. E., & Asterious, D. (2010). The effect of board composition on the in formativeness and quality of annual earnings: Empirical evidence from Greece. Research in International Business and Finance, 24(2), 190–205.

Hamdam, M., Al-Hayale, A. M., & Aboagela, E. M. (2009). The impact of audit committee characteristics on earnings management: Additional evidence from jordan. Ahlia University.

Hashim, U. J. B., & Rahman, R. B. A. (2010). Board independence, board diligence, board expertise and impact onaudit report lag in Malaysian market. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/ abstract=1717479

Hope, O. K., & Langli, J. C. (2008). Auditor independence in private firm setting. In Working Paper,Rotman School of Management.

Imen, F. S., & Anis, J. (2015). External auditor’s characteristics, corporate governance and audit reporting quality. IPASI International Journal of Management, 3(2), 58–66.

Iyoha, F. O. (2012). Company attributes and the timeliness of financial reporting in Nigeria. Business Intelligence Journal, 5(1), 41–49. Retrieved from http://eprints.covenantuniversity.edu.ng/7206/1/Article_4.pdf%0A

Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

John, K., & Senbet, L. W. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 371–403.

Kelton, A., & Yang, Y. (2008). The impact of corporate governance of the internet financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27, 62–87.

Kim, H. J., & Yoon, S. S. (2005). The impact of corporate governance on earnings management in Korea. Malaysian Accounting Review, 7(1), 43–59.

Leventis, S., Weetman, P., & Caramanis, C. (2005). Determinants of audit report lag: Some evidence from the Athens Stock Exchange. International Journal of Auditing, 9(1), 45–58.

Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer, 48, 59–77.

Mohamad-Nor, M. N., Shafie, R., & Wan-Hussin, W. N. (2010). Corporate governance and audit report lag in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), 6(2), 57–84.

Okougbo, P., & Efobi, U. R. (2014). Timeliness of financial reporting in nigeria. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 28(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2014.11463127

Oraka, A. O., Okoye, J. A., & Ezejiofor, R. A. (2019). Determinants of financial reporting timeliness : An empirical study of Nigerian deposit money banks. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research, 5(9), 18–35.

Owusu-Ansah, S., & Yeoh, J. (2005). The effect of legislation on corporate reporting practices. Abacus, 41(1), 92–109.

Saqer, S. Y. (2015). Timeliness of audited financial reports of jordanian listed companies. IPASI International Journal of Management, 3(2), 39–47.

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2011). Code of corporate governance for public companies in Nigeria. Abuja, Nigeria.

Soltani, B. (2002). Timeliness of corporate and audit reports: some empirical evidence in the french context. The International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 215–246.

Turel, A. (2010). Timeliness of financial reporting in emerging capital markets: Evidence from Turkey. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/29799//1/MPRA_paper

Wu, C.-H., Wu, C.-S., & Liu, V. W. (2008). The release timing of annual reports and board characteristics. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 2(1), 103–108.

Zaitul, K. (2010). Board of directors, audit committee, auditor characteristics and the timeliness of financial reporting in listed companies in Indonesia. University of Malaysia.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jaroe.v4i1.17865

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Published by:

Accounting Department
Economics and Business Faculty
Syiah Kuala University
Kopelma Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia - 23111
E-ISSN: 2621-1041

 

Creative Commons License
Journal of Accounting Research, Organization and Economics by Accounting Department of Economics and Business Faculty of Syiah Kuala University is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JAROE/index.