1. Home
  2. Vol 21, No 3 (2021)
  3. Nurizzan

Hubungan kemampuan visuospasial dengan kemampuan anatomi

M. Ghilman Nurizzan

Abstract


Along with the development of medical learning methods, anatomy remains one of the most difficult subjects to understand among other basic medical education sciences. The study of the structure of the human body, its parts and the relationships between these parts involves the processing of visuospatial information, namely the understanding of the form, location, and position of an object against other objects in 3-dimensional space. The purpose of this research is to find out how the relationship between visuospatial abilities and anatomical abilities of the students of the Faculty of Medicine, Sebelas Maret University

Keywords


Visuospasial; anatomi; mahasiswa; kognitif

References


Depdiknas. Standar Kompetensi Pendidikan Kedokteran Dasar Indonesia (KIPDI III) Jakarta; 2006.

Bandyopadhyay R, Biswas R. Students’ Perception and Attitude on Methods of Anatomy Teaching in a Medical College of West Bengal, India. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2017;: p. AC10-AC14.

Losco CD, Grant WD, Armson A, Meyer AJ, Walker BF. Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science: A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 44. Medical Teacher. 2017;: p. 234-243.

Nguyen N, Mulla A, Nelson AJ, Wilson TD. Visuospatial Anatomy Comprehension: The Role of Spatial Visualization Ability and Problem-Solving Strategies. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2013;: p. 1-9.

Lufler RS, Zumwalt AC, Romney CA, Hoagland TM. Effect of Visual–Spatial Ability on Medical Student’s Performance in a Gross Anatomy Course. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2012;: p. 3-9.

Rochford K. Spatial learning disabilities and underarchievement among university anatomy students. Medical Education. 1985;: p. 19.

Guillot A, Champely S, Batier C, Thiriet P, Collet C. Relationship Between Spatial Abilities, Mental Rotation and Fuctional Antomy Learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2007;: p. 502.

Hegarty M, Keehner M, Khooshabeh P, Montello DR. How spatial abilities enhance, and are enhanced by, dental education. Learning and Individual Differences. 2009;: p. 61-70.

Zeidner M. Test Anxiety The State of the Art Mount Carmel: Kluwer Academic Publisher; 1998.

Ouanes S, Popp J. High Cortisol and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a review of the literature. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2019;: p. 7.

Small DM, Gitelman D, Simmons K, Bloise SM, Parrish T, Mesulam MM. Monetary Incentives Enhance Processing in Brain Regions Mediating Top-down Control of Attention. Oxford University Press. 2005;: p. 1860.

Eckerlein N, Roth A, Engelschalk T, Steuer G, Schmitz B, Dresel M. The Role of Motivational Regulation in Exam Preparation: Results From a Standardized Diary Study. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;: p. 6.

Sansgiri SS, Sail K. Effect of Students's Perception of Course Load on Test Anxiety. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2006;: p. 2.

MacInnis DJ. Constructs and Measures of Individual Differences in Imagery Processing: a Review. Advances in Consumer Research. 1987;: p. 88-92


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.24815/jks.v21i3.20977

Refbacks