Model For Settling Ulayat Rights Conflicts Based On Traditional Law In Hitulama State Leihitu District Central Maluku Region

Leli Joko Suryono, Saiful Bahri Pelu

Abstract


There are still various institutions outside the court in addressing Ulayat land issues in Hitulama state, Leihitu district, Central Maluku area. There are many customary lands in this area that belong to customary law communities, which frequently leads to interest conflicts. Indigenous peoples set the King as the head of the customary alliance, symbol, as well as the system and model of customary law itself in resolving disputes over customary rights of indigenous peoples. The aim of this study is to define the model for settling customary rights disputes based on customary law and to see if the model used in Hitulama state, Leihitu district, Central Maluku region meets the principles of justice. The methodology employed is an empirically grounded, legally descriptive analytic approach. Study participants include local officials, elders, and members of the community who have been involved in land conflicts. This study's sample, selected using a non-random method, consists of natives living in Hitulama. Primary data were collected through in-person interviews. The basic legal materials are the laws and regulations directly pertaining to the issue of study; the secondary legal materials are books and scholarly articles; and the tertiary legal materials are dictionaries in Indonesian and English. Afterward, a qualitative analysis was performed on the collected data.

Keywords


Customary land disputes, customary law, dispute resolution, interest conflicts, the role of customary heads

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books

Government Data on Hitulama State year 2019

Murad, R. (1991). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Atas Tanah. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Nader, L., & Todd, J. (1978). Introduction: The disputing process. In The disputing process–Law in ten societies (pp. 1-40). Columbia University Press.

Pruitt, D. G., & Kugler, K. G. (2014). Some research frontiers in the study of conflict and its resolution. In P. T. Coleman, M. Deutsch, & E. C. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 1087–1109). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.

Salindeho, J. (2004). Manusia, tanah, hak dan hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Journal Articles

Bocarejo, D. (2020). Cultivating Justice beyond Law. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 43(2), 304-318.

Currie, E. (2019). Market, crime and community: Toward a mid-range theory of post-industrial violence. In The Crime Conundrum, Routledge,17-44.

De Silva, B. M., Higdon, D. M., Brunton, S. L., & Kutz, J. N. (2020). Discovery of physics from data: universal laws and discrepancies. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 3, 25.

Dwisvimiar, I. (2011). Keadilan dalam perspektif filsafat ilmu hukum. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(3), 522-531.

Lacey-Barnacle, M., Robison, R., & Foulds, C. (2020). Energy justice in the developing world: a review of theoretical frameworks, key research themes and policy implications. Energy for Sustainable Development, 55, 122-138.

Rasyad, M. (2019). Pembuatan Akta Perdamaian Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Ulayat Melalui Notaris Dikabupaten Agam. Soumatera Law Review, 2(1), 135-149.

Wantu, F. M. (2012). Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan dalam Putusan Hakim di Peradilan Perdata. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(3), 479-489.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v6i2.29118

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Copyright (c) 2022 Syiah Kuala Law Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License

Syiah Kuala Law Journal published by Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SKLJ.