National Criminal Law Transition: Existence and Implications of Criminal Law Before the Enactment of New Criminal Code

Bintara Sura Priambada, Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara, Shofiana Nurul Arifin

Abstract


Transitional provisions in the New Criminal Code that emphasize the implementation of the New Criminal Code starting in 2026 actually raise legal problems. This problem is because there is a substance in criminal law reform whose implementation awaits the enactment of the New Criminal Code. This research with a focus on the implications of the enactment of the transitional provisions of the application of the New Criminal Code to the substance of criminal law reform before the New Criminal Code can be implemented is a normative legal research with a concept and statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that the existence of transitional provisions in the New Criminal Code on the one hand seeks to guarantee legal certainty. The transitional provisions in the New Criminal Code also pose problems because there are several substances for reforming the criminal law that cannot be implemented because they are waiting for the New Criminal Code to be declared effective and can be implemented starting in 2026. the enactment of the New Criminal Code in 2026. As a transitional solution, arrangements through a Joint Decree need to be made in addition to referring to the provisions of the lex favor reo principle as an alternative.

Keywords


New Criminal Code; Criminal Law Reform; Transitional

Full Text:

PDF

References


A, M., Wardhani, A. C., & Cahyowati, T. D. (2021). Who Believes Hoaxes? Xenophobia and Religiosity as Hoax Predictors among Social Media Users. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i2/8383

Adawiyah, R., & Rozah, U. (2020). Indonesia ’ s Criminal Justice System with Pancasila Perspective as an Open Justice System. Law Reform, 16(2), 149–162.

Aditya, N. R. (2023). Sudah Disahkan, RKUHP Dikeluarkan dari Prolegnas Prioritas 2023. nasional.kompas.com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/12/12/12335401/sudah-disahkan-rkuhp-dikeluarkan-dari-prolegnas-prioritas-2023 (Diakses Pada Tanggal 2 Januari 2023).

Assegaf, R. S. (2018). Sentencing Guidance in the Indonesia’s Criminal Code Reform Bill: For Whose Benefit? Australian Journal of Asian Law, 19(1), 87–104. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3239777

Br Sinaga, A., Usman, U., & Wahyudhi, D. (2021). Perbuatan Menguntit (Stalking) dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Pampas: Journal of Criminal Law, 2(2), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v2i2.13715

Butar-butar, M. F. (2021). Exemptions from Liability in Indonesian Criminal Law Reform. Annals of R.S.C.B, 25(5), 5528–5533.

Chumairo’, M., Dewi Masyithoh, N., & Adila, A. H. (2021). Criminal Policy for Users Ofservices Prostitution to Achieve Substantial Justice. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 3(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev/2021.3.1.9074

Dewi, E., Anwar, M., Andrisman, T., & Husin, B. R. (2021). Reducing the expenses of criminal jurisdictions through strengthening the principle of judgment based on local awareness. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 25(2), 1–10.

Dipa Nugraha, D. O. (2020). Diskursus Literasi Abad 21 di Indonesia. Pendidikan Edutama, 7(1), 2020.

Fahmi, F., Iqsandri, R., & Rizana, R. (2022). The Use Of The Concept Of Restorative Justice Against The Criminal Act Of Murse In The Policepekanbaru City Resort. Jurnal Gagasan Hukum, 4(01), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v4i01.10165

Faisal, M. R. (2021). Pembaruan Pilar Hukum Pidana Dalam RUU KUHP. Magister Hukum Udayana, 10(2), 293.

Gracia, R., Matrutty, I., & Saimima, J. M. (2023). The Death Penalty In The Draft Criminal Code (Rkuhp): What Are The Regulations And Mechanisms? Legalitas, 16(1), 117.

Hairi, P. J. (2018). Konsep dan Pembaruan Residivisme dalam Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 9(2), 204. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130390

Hajairin, H., Syamsuddin, S., Kasmar, K., & Sanusi, G. (2022). Kebijakan Pidana Pengawasan Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Iblam Law Review, 2(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v2i2.81

Halim, A., Sudarsono, S., Negara, T. A. S., & Hadi, H. R. (2020). The Urgency for the Implementation of Transition Norm “Lex Favor Reo” in the Imposition of Tax Sanction in Indonesia. Open Journal for Legal Studies, 3(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojls.0302.07153h

Hanafi Amrani. (2019). Politik Pembaruan Hukum Pidana. UII Press.

Hatta, M. (2022). Prospek Pemberlakuan RKUHP Pasca Disahkan Menjadi Undang-undang dalam Perspektif Maqasid Syariah Sejarah Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana. Al-Qānūn: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam, 25(2), 250.

Herlius, F. (2022). Kaidah Hukum Adat Dalam Penuntutan Demi Keadilan Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Perspektif, 27(2), 94–103.

Husain, M. A. (2022). Stаtutа Pssi Dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia. Al ’Adl, 14(1), 12.

I Gusti Ngurah Bayu Pradiva, D. R. S. H. (2022). Perluasan Asas Legalitas Dalam Rkuhp Sebagai Upaya Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 10(8), 1766–1778.

Imam Asmarudin. (2022). Struggle of Legal Positivism Versus Progressive Thoughts in the Formal Tests of the Job Creation Act (Legal Development through Hermeneutics). Dinamika Hukum, 22(1), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.1.3178

Irawatu, A. C. (2019). Politik Hukum Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana (Ruu Kuhp Asas Legalitas) Arista. Adil Indonesia Jurnal, 2(1), 1–12.

J. Efendi, J. I. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Kencana.

Lestari, O., Ginting, B., Nasution, A. R., & Hasibuan, S. A. (2022). Juridical Review of Social Media Defamation. International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences, 3(1), 190–194.

Lubis, F. (2023). Implementation Of Restorative Justice, The Intent Of Punishment, And Legal Clarity In Indonesia. Russian Law Journal, 9(3), 813–823.

Luthfi, M., Adhial, Y., Dwi, F., Indri, R., & Kukuh, H. (2021). Efforts to Protect Adat ’ s Communities in the Settlement of Environmental Criminal Cases in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law Reform, 590(50), 159–162.

Masna Nuros Safitri, E. W. (2022). Pendekatan Restorative Justice Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Sosial Sebagai Implementasi Asas Ultimum Remedium. Esensi Hukum, 4(1), 12–23.

Muhamad, N. A. (2020). The Legal Philosophy of Lon L. Fuller: Profile. The Social Contract Journal SCJ, 1(1), 2.

Muhammad Ali, F. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Korban Unlawful Killing Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Reformasi Hukum, 27(1), 370.

Muladi, B. N. A. (1998). Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana (2nd ed.). Alumni.

Muldani, T. (2022). Implikasi Awal Penerbitan SKB UU ITE Pasal 27 Ayat (3). MUKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(2), 150.

Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research In Indonesia: Its Origins And Approaches. ACLJ, 4(1), 5.

Octarina, N. F., Sudiawati, S., & Mardika, M. (2022). The Application of the Conditio Sine Qua Non Principle on the Crime of Damage through Social Media. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 7(1), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v7i1.303

Rahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Kompas.

Ramdan, A. (2020). Kontroversi Delik Penghinaan Presiden/Wakil Presiden dalam RKUHP. Jurnal Yudisial, 13(2), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v13i2.421

Redi, A. (2018). Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (1st ed.). Sinar Grafika.

Rochaeti, N., Hafidh, M., Rozah, U., & Park, J. (2023). A Restorative Justice System in Indonesia : A Close View from the Indigenous Peoples ’ Practices. Sriwijaya Law Review, 7(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss1.1919.pp87-104

Rusydianta, M. (2021). Reformulating Fraud Crimes Under Article 378 Of The Criminal Code Based On Restorative Justice Values. Prophetic Law, 3(2), 221.

Santoso, A. (2023). KUHP Baru Jadi UU Pertama di 2023 yang Diteken Jokowi. news.detik.com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6495235/kuhp-baru-jadi-uu-pertama-di-2023-yang-diteken-jokowi (Diakses Pada Tanggal 3 Januari 2023).

Sindy, Nurul Mutmainah Al Zahra, N. N. (2022). Rekonstruksi Komisi Yudisial Sebagai Upaya Optimalisasi Penegakan Integritas Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Jurnal Studia Legalia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 33–39.

Skandiva, R., & Harefa, B. (2022). Urgensi Penerapan Foreign Bribery Dalam Konvensi Antikorupsi di Indonesia. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i2.826

Suhariyanto, B. (2018). Problema Penyerapan Adat oleh Pengadilan dan Pengaruhnya bagi Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 30(3), 421. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.33227

Suhartono, S. (2019). Hukum Positif Problematik Penerapan Dan Solusi Teoritiknya. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v15i2.2549

Susanto, A. (2022). Perbandingan Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebelum Adanya RUU KUHP Pada RUU KUHP dan Sistem Dari Negara Belanda. Justisia, 7(1), 125–146.

Ulfah, M. (2021). Pidana Kerja Sosial, Tokyo Rules, serta Tantangannya di Masa Mendatang. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 10(3), 517. https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2021.v10.i03.p07

Vincentius Patria Setyawan, I. D. K. (2021). The Urgence Of Rechterlijk Pardon Regulation In Criminal Law Renewal. Inovasi Penelitian, 2(2), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.31857/s013116462104007x

Wijaya, I. M. O. (2022). Restorative Justice dalam Tinjauan Hukum Progresif: Eksistensi dan Implikasi. Indonesia Berdaya, 3(3), 710.

Wirabakti, M. Z., & Rochaeti, N. (2022). A Juridical Analysis of the Comparison of Legality Principle in the Indonesian Criminal Code (WvS) and the Draft of New Indonesian Criminal Code (National Criminal Code). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), 3030–3040. https://bircu-journal.com/index.php/birci/article/view/3946




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v7i3.32127

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Copyright (c) 2023 Syiah Kuala Law Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License

Syiah Kuala Law Journal published by Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SKLJ.