DIGNITY OF THE FINAL AND BINDING NATURE OF DKPP DECISIONS VIEWED FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE

Joice Soraya, Farhan Farhan, Dedi Wardana Nasoetion, Ikhsan Wahyudi

Abstract


The base principle of legal certainty is to guarantee that the law must be enforced properly and appropriately, this is because the main purpose of law is certainty. The DKPP's decision is final and binding, so it meant that no legal action could be taken, according to the judicial review of Law Number 15 of 2011 about General Election Organizers. The Constitutional Court of Indonesia (Mahkamah Konstitusi) through its decision Number 31/PUU-XI/2013 interprets that the final and binding nature of DKPP decisions is for the President, KPU, Provincial KPU, Regency/Municipal KPU, and Bawaslu. This creates legal uncertainty, which contradicts with the base principle of law. Furthermore, in terms of consequences, there is no legal mechanism for a group that fell there are violations of the election administrators to seek for justice. The results of this study show that the DKPP's decision should still be interpreted as final and binding like the decision of the Constitutional Court. DKPP decisions which are followed up through decisions of the President, KPU, and Bawaslu should also not be subject to legal action in the Administrative Court, because the KTUN issued is based on the results of the judicial examination based on the provisions applicable laws and regulations. Though, it is necessary to find a solution to provide a sense of justice for those who are harmed due to violations of the ethics of election organizers. Because the purpose of the law is not only to provide sanctions for the violator but also to provide legal protection for the victim.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aldi, J. A., Tanbun, E. P., & Nugraha, X. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Kewenangan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) dalam Menciptakan Pemilu yang Demokratis di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum De’rechtsstaat, 5(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v5i2.1941

Ali, A. (2010). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) & Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Undang-Undang (Legisprudence) Volume I Pemahaman Awal. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Asrun, A. M. (2020). Hukum Acara Sengketa Pemilu Mahkama Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2013a). Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu ‘Mengawal Kehormatan Pemilu’. Sosialisasi Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia Dengan Jajaran Pemerintahan Provinsi Aceh, LSM, Ormas, OKP, Parpol, Media Massa Dan Akademisi.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2013b). Pengenalan tentang DKPP untuk Penegak Hukum. Forum Rapat Pimpinan Kepolisian Republik Indonesia.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2016). Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi. Sinar Grafika.

Farhan. (2021). Kedudukan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum (DKPP) dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia [Universitas Mataram]. http://eprints.unram.ac.id/23750/

Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2021a). Analysis of the Implementation of the Non-Conviction-Based Concept in the Practice of Asset Recovery of Money Laundering Criminal Act in Indonesia from the Perspective of Presumption of Innocence. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 11(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v11i1.13961

Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2021b). Legal Development Through the Implementation of Non-Conviction Based Concepts in Money Laundering Asset Recovery Practices in Indonesia. 2nd International Conference on Law and Human Rights (ICLHR 2021), 506–513. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211112.066

Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2022). Restorative Justice: Antara Teori dan Praktik. HnG Consulting. https://hng.co.id/view/article-details?id_post=Restorative-Justice:-Antara-Teori-dan-Praktik-2u7zUYvkES

Fauzia, A., Hamdani, F., & Octavia, D. G. R. (2021). The Revitalization of the Indonesian Legal System in the Order of Realizing the Ideal State Law. Progressive Law Review, 3(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.36448/plr.v3i01.46

Hamdani, F. (2021). Studi Komparasi Pengujian Undang-Undang dalam Sistem Hukum Prancis dan Indonesia dalam Rangka Pembaruan Hukum di Indonesia [Universitas Mataram]. http://eprints.unram.ac.id/25681/

Hamdani, F., & Fauzia, A. (2021). Legal Discourse: The Spirit of Democracy and Human Rights Post Simultaneous Regional Elections 2020 in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era. Lex Scientia Law Review, 5(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.45887

Hapsoro, F. L., & Ismail. (2020). Interpretasi Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Konstitusionalitas untuk Mewujudkan the Living Constitution. Jambura Law Review, 2(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5644

Ismail, & Hapsoro, F. L. (2021). Paradigma Makna Final dan Mengikat Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Pennyelenggara Pemilu. Jurnal Hukum Justitia Et Pax, 37(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v37i2.4312

Lihat bagian menimbang Putusan No. 82/G/2020/PTUN-JKT.

Lihat Pasal 5 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.

Lihat Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 005/PUU-I/2003.

Lihat Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 31/PUU-XI/2013, hlm. 70.

Manan, B., & Harijanti, S. D. (2015). Memahami Konstitusi: Makna dan Aktualisasi. RajaGrafindo.

Putra, A. (2020). Dua Cara Agar Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Selalu Dipatuhi. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/DUA-CARA-AGAR-PUTUSAN-MAHKAMAH-KONSTITUSI-SELALU-DIPATUHI-134558

Putra, M. A. (2020). Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara yang Berpotensi Menimbulkan Akibat Hukum sebagai Objek Sengketa di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 3(1), 1–18.

Rajab, A. (2021). Kewenangan Komisi Pemilihan Umum dalam Mengaktifkan Kembali Anggota Komisi Pemilihan Umum. Jurnal USM Law Review, 4(1), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i1.2702

Sanden, J. (2003). Methods of Interpreting the Constitution; Estonia’s Way in an Increasingly Integrated Europe. Juridica International, 8, 128–139. https://www.juridicainternational.eu/article_full.php?uri=2003_VIII_128_methods-of-interpreting-the-constitution-estonias-way-in-an-increasingly-integrated-europe

Sasongko, W. (2015). Efektivitas Putusan DKPP dalam Mahkamah Etik Penyelenggara Negara. Jurnal Etika Dan Pemilu, 1(1), 49–58.

Strauss, D. A. (2010). The Living Constitution. Oxford University Press.

Subekti, V. S. (2019). Demokrasi dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemilu di Indonesia. In Bunga Rampai Memperkuat Peradaban Hukum dan Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.

Sulastri. (2020). Urgency of the Decision of the Election Organizers Based on Law Number 7 Of 2017 (Study Of DKPP Decision Number 317- Pke-Dpp / X / 2019 & PTUN Decision Number 82 / G / 2020 / Ptun.Jkt). De Jure Critical Laws Journal, 1(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.48171/jwh.v1i1.20

Susilo, N. (2012). Semua Anggota KPU Pamekasan Dipecat. Kompas.Com. https://money.kompas.com/read/2012/12/06/22101784/index-html

Takahashi, R. (2008). Restorative Justice Almost 50 Years Later: Japanese American Redress for Exclusion, Restriction, and Incarceration. In K. Van Wormer (Ed.), Restorative Justice Across the East and the West. Casa Verde Publishing.

Wardhana, A. F. G. (2018). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 92/PUU-XIV/2016 terhadap Independensi Komisi Pemilihan Umum. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.1-20




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v8i2.41137

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Copyright (c) 2024 Syiah Kuala Law Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License

Syiah Kuala Law Journal published by Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at http://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SKLJ.