Collective scaffolding in virtual collaborative writing: A study during emergency remote teaching in Indonesia

Hanna Sundari, Rina Husnaini Febriyanti

Abstract


Along with online education and emergency remote teaching trends during the COVID-19 pandemic, collective scaffolding within virtual collaboration in an academic writing course is still under investigation. To fill the gap, this present study explored to what extent the collective scaffolding provided in virtual collaborative writing helped learners complete writing tasks and examined EFL university students’ responses to this learning activity. Guided by a qualitative case study design framework, 43 EFL university students, who attended an academic writing course, voluntarily participated in the study. The data were collected through multiple sources during the virtual writing course, such as students’ work artifacts (photographs and descriptions), an online questionnaire, and teacher’s written reflective journals of Zoom class video recordings as the research instruments. A thematic analysis with a category system was applied to answer the formulated research questions. The findings reveal that collective scaffolding occurred during collaborative writing in the text co-construction during the writing process. Further, collaborative writing allowed L2 improvements, mutual support, and contribution. Additionally, the activity of assisting and monitoring by the teacher was still significant during group deliberation and text development. Although technology-assisted collaborative writing sounds possible and affordable, a few students felt disappointed as they experienced some technological constraints and unexpected group dynamics. Some groups successfully achieved the tasks and social dimensions easily; while others needed a longer time to reach the group development and text productivity.


Keywords


collaborative writing; collective scaffolding; EFL university students; EFL writing; scaffolding

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alwaleedi, M. A., Gillies, R. M., & Hamid, M. O. (2019). Collaborative writing in Arabic as a second language (ASL) classrooms: A mixed-method study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1521422

Amin, F. M., & Sundari, H. (2020). EFL students’ preferences on digital platforms during emergency remote teaching: Video conference, LMS, or messenger application? Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 362-378. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16929

Atmojo, A. E. P., & Nugroho, A. (2020). EFL classes must go online: Teaching activities and challenges during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Register Journal, 13(1), 49-76. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i1.49-76

Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153

Behrendt, M., & Machtmes, K. (2016). Photovoice as an evaluation tool for student learning on a field trip. Research in Science and Technological Education, 34(2), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1124410

Boblett, N. (2012). Scaffolding: Defining the metaphor. Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, 12(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7916/salt.v12i2.1357

Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083

Bruffee, K. A. (1987). The art of collaborative learning. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 19(2), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1987.9939136

Call-Cummings, M., Hauber-Özer, M., Byers, C., & Mancuso, G. P. (2018). The power of/in photovoice. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 42(4), 399-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2018.1492536

Churiyah, M., Sholikhan, S., Filianti, F., & Sakdiyyah, D. A. (2020). Indonesia education readiness conducting distance learning in COVID-19 Pandemic situation. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(6), 491-507. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i6.1833

Donato, R., (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Ablex Publishing.

Dornyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2009). Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Duff, P. A. (2012). How to carry out case study research. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 95-116). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444347340

Duff, P. A. (2020). Case study research: Making language learning complexities visible. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 144-164). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203835654

Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Ghufron, M. A. (2016). Process-genre approach, product approach, and students’ self-esteem in teaching writing. Indonesian EFL Journal: Journal of ELT, Linguistics, and Literature, 2(1), 37-54.

Gonulal, T., & Loewen, S. (2018). Scaffolding technique. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1-5). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0180

Henschen, B. M., & Sidlow, E. I. (1990). Collaborative writing. College Teaching, 38(1), 29-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1990.10532183

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Hsieh, Y. C. (2017). A case study of the dynamics of scaffolding among ESL learners and online resources in collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1273245

Lajoie, S. P. (2005). Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instructional Science, 33(5-6), 541-557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-1279-2

Li, K. L., & Razali, A. B. (2019). Idea sharing: Process-based approach to writing in Malaysian English education. Pasaa, 58, 319-341.

Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.631142

Manegre, M., & Gutiérrez-Colón, M. (2020). Foreign language learning through collaborative writing in knowledge-building forums. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1836499

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Michell, M., & Sharpe, T. (2005). Collective instructional scaffolding in English as a second language classrooms. Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 20(1), 31-58.

Mirzaei, A., & Eslami, Z. R. (2015). ZPD-activated languaging and collaborative L2 writing. Educational Psychology, 35(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.814198

Mulligan, C., & Garofalo, R. (2011). A collaborative writing approach: Methodology and student assessment. The Language Teacher, 35(3), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.37546/jalttlt35.3-1

Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9(1), 34-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410008667135

Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1992). An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(92)90002-7

Oliffe, J. L., Bottorff, J. L., Kelly, M., & Halpin, M. (2008). Analyzing participant produced photographs from an ethnographic study of fatherhood and smoking. Research in Nursing and Health, 31(5), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20269

Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to academic writing (3rd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Rahiem, M. (2020). The emergency remote learning experience of university students in Indonesia amidst the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.1

Rodgers, E. M. (2004). Interactions that scaffold reading performance. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(4), 501-532. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3604_4

Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publication Ltd.

Shvarts, A., & Bakker, A. (2019). The early history of the scaffolding metaphor: Bernstein, Luria, Vygotsky, and before. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(1), 4-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1574306

Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002

Storch, N. (2011). Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000079

Storch, N. (2018a). Collaborative writing. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0395

Storch, N. (2018b). Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 51(2), 262-277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000034

Strack, R. W. (2017). What is photovoice? A brief summary. PhotovoiceKit.Org.

Such, B. (2019). Scaffolding English language learners for online collaborative writing activities. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 473-481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1579233

Sujarwo, S., Sukmawati, S., Akhiruddin, A., Ridwan, R., & Siradjuddin, S. (2020). An analysis of university students’ perspective on online learning in the midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 53(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v53i2.24964

Thomas, T. A. (2014). Developing team skills through a collaborative writing assignment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(4), 479-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.850587

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050608668639

Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education and Behavior, 24(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309

Wang, L. (2019). Effects of regulation on interaction pattern in web-based collaborative writing activity. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1667831

Wang, Y.. (2011). College English writing on scaffolding theory. Studies in Literature and Language, 3(3), 46-48. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.sll.1923156320110303.210

Williams, R., & Grudnoff, L. (2011). Making sense of reflection: A comparison of beginning and experienced teachers’ perceptions of reflection for practice. Reflective Practice, 12(3), 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2011.571861

Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford Press.

Zhang, M. (2019). Towards a quantitative model of understanding the dynamics of collaboration in collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.04.001

Zheng, B., Niiya, M., & Warschauer, M. (2015). Wikis and collaborative learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(3), 357-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.948041




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.25039

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats