Research gap strategies in article introductions of different rank applied linguistics journals

Safnil Arsyad, Yetti Zainil

Abstract


Research gap (RG) becomes an important rhetorical work in research article introductions in all fields, especially in a competitive research publication atmosphere. A research article (RA) submitted to a reputable journal may be rejected because the writers fail to show the ‘niche’ in reviewing previous relevant studies to justify their research project. This research aims to find how writers in Applied Linguistics (AL) published in international journals of different quality in terms of their quartile value address the novelty in their journal article introductions. Forty articles were selected from eight different reputable international journals in AL of different tiers for the corpus of this study. The content analysis method under the umbrella of the qualitative approach was applied in the data collection and analysis. Six RG strategies, as suggested by Arianto et al. (2021), were used as a model for analysis and then the linguistic features used by the writers in realizing the RGs. The results show that among the six different RG strategies, the most frequently used by international writers are Strategy 2 (inadequate research) and Strategy 4 (contradictive/conflicting evidence). Among the four groups of RAs, those published in Quartile 1 journals used the most frequent strategies. The frequent linguistic features used by international writers are adversative conjunctions and adjective-modifying nouns to signal their RG strategies. To improve the quality of an article introduction, writers, especially novice writers, should use multiple strategies with the appropriate linguistic features.

Keywords


applied linguistics; international journals; journal ranking; research article introduction; research gap strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adnan, Z. (2014). Prospects of Indonesian research articles (RAs) being considered for publication in center journals: A comparative study of rhetorical patterns of RAs in selected humanities and hard science discipline. In A. Lyda & K. Warchal (Eds.), Occupying niches: Interculturality, cross-culturality and aculturality in academic research (pp. 79-99). Springer.

Amnuai, W. (2017). The textual organization of the discussion sections of accounting research articles. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 040(2), 389-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.10.007

Arianto, M. A., Saukah, A., Basthomi, Y., & Wulyani, A. N. (2021). Previous studies have several limitations …: Indonesian doctoral students’, Indonesian academics’, and international authors’ research gap strategies in ELT research article abstracts and introductions. Journal of Language & Education, 7(2), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.11735

Arredondo-Tapia, D. I., & Garcia-Ponce, E. E. (2021). Role of task repetition and content familiarity in EFL students’ fluency and accuracy in narrative tasks: A case study. Journal of Language Education, 7(2), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.11202

Arsyad, S., Zaim, M., & Susyla, D. (2018). Review and citation style in article introductions: A comparative study between national and international English-medium journal in medical sciences. Discourse and Interaction, 11(1), 28-51. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2018-1-28

Astrid, A., Rukmini, D., Fitriati, S. W., & Syafryadin (2021). Experiencing the peer feedback activities with teacher’s intervention through face-to-face and asynchronous online interaction: The impact on students’ writing development and perceptions. Journal of Language and Education, 7(2), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.10585

Belcher, W. L. (2009). Writing your journal article in twelve weeks: A guide to academic publishing success. SAGE Publications.

Brooks, G., Clenton, J., & Fraser, S. (2021). Exploring the importance of vocabulary for English as an additional language learners’ reading comprehension. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(3), 351-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.3.3

Chen, X., & Li, M. (2019). Chinese learner writers’ niche establishment in the Literature Review chapter of theses: A diachronic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.03.006

Cheng, Y., & Uyen, V. D. A. (2020). Needs analysis of Vietnamese Daikin engineers in their workplace: A preliminary study. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 11(2), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.6706/TIESPJ.202012_11(2).0004

Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2014). Non-parametric statistics for non-statistician: A step-by-step approach. John Willey and Sons.

Deveci, T. (2020). The introduction section of research articles in English and Turkish: The case of educational sciences - a preliminary study. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 119-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.32601/ejal.710233

Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.

Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22, 338-342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF

Farnia, M., & Barati, S. (2017). Writing introduction sections of research articles in applied linguistics: Crosslinguistic study of native and non-native writers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 486-494. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8357

Huang, H. (2020). Learning scenarios in an EMI classroom in higher education: Students’ perceptions in Taiwan. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 60-72.

Jogthong, C. (2001). Research article introductions in Thai: Genre analysis of academic writing [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. West Virginia University.

Jung, J. (2021). The role of glossing and working memory capacity in second language reading comprehension. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(2), 438-450. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.2.4.438

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 269-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003

Lim, J. M. (2012). How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers’ rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(3), 229-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.05.002

Miles, D. A. (2017). A taxonomy of research gaps: Identifying and defining the seven research gaps [Unpublished work of Doctoral Student Workshop]. Miles Development Industry Corporation.

Müeller-Bloch, C., & Kranz, J. (2015, December 13-16). A framework for rigorously identifying research gaps in qualitative literature reviews [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Texas, USA.

Ngadiman, A., & Tanone, C. (2014). Adversative conjunctions in Indonesian EFL teachers’ academic writing. Magister Scientiae, 35, 158-172.

Pratiwi, S. N., & Kurniawan. E. (2021). Rhetorical move and genre knowledge development of English and Indonesian abstracts: A comparative analysis. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(3), 885-900. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i3.21038

Rajabpour, A. (2020). Students’ perception on M-reader. TEFLIN Journal, 31(2), 277-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v31i2/277-301

Ryu, J., & Lee, B. (2021). Diagnosis of Korean EFL high school students’ reading fluency using informal reading inventory. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(2), 489-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.2.7.489

Scimago Research Group (2007). Description of Scimago Journal ranking. https://www.scimagojr.com/SCImagoJournalRank.pdf

Sung, K. (2021). EFL undergraduate and graduate learners’ views on writing intensive online subject matter course. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(2), 520-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.2.9.520

Suryani, I., Yacob, A., & Aziz, N, H. (2015). ‘Indicating a research gap’ in Computer Science research article introductions by non-native English writers. Asian Social Science, 11(28), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n28p293

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press.

Tovar-Viera, R. (2018). Linguistic realizations of research article abstract written by Ecuadorian and North American academic authors. Proceedings of the 12th Conference in Applied Linguistics for Ph.D. Students (pp. 82-99). Research Institute of Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences of Budapest. http://www.nytud.hu/alknyelvdok18/proceedings/anyd12.pdf

Triastuti, A. (2020). Assessing English pre-service teachers’ knowledge base teaching: Linking knowledge and self-portrayal. TEFLIN Journal, 31(1), 108-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v31i1/108-138

Truong, K. D. (2021). Task-related motivational strategies in EFL classroom: A glimpse into teachers’ and students’ perceptions. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(2), 468-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.2.6.468

Wang, Y. (2020). Emotion and syntactic complexity in L2 writing: A corpus-based study on Chinese college-level students’ English writing. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 1-17.

Zhang, Y. (2021). Adversative and concessive conjunctions in EFL Writing: Corpus-based description and rhetorical structure analysis. Springer.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.25302

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2355-2794, Online ISSN: 2461-0275

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats